Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
28 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Polygon Placement Revisited: (Degree of Freedom + 1)-SUM Hardness and an Improvement via Offline Dynamic Rectangle Union (2111.02544v1)

Published 3 Nov 2021 in cs.CG, cs.CC, and cs.DS

Abstract: We revisit the classical problem of determining the largest copy of a simple polygon $P$ that can be placed into a simple polygon $Q$. Despite significant effort, known algorithms require high polynomial running times. (Barequet and Har-Peled, 2001) give a lower bound of $n{2-o(1)}$ under the 3SUM conjecture when $P$ and $Q$ are (convex) polygons with $\Theta(n)$ vertices each. This leaves open whether we can establish (1) hardness beyond quadratic time and (2) any superlinear bound for constant-sized $P$ or $Q$. In this paper, we affirmatively answer these questions under the $k$SUM conjecture, proving natural hardness results that increase with each degree of freedom (scaling, $x$-translation, $y$-translation, rotation): (1) Finding the largest copy of $P$ that can be $x$-translated into $Q$ requires time $n{2-o(1)}$ under the 3SUM conjecture. (2) Finding the largest copy of $P$ that can be arbitrarily translated into $Q$ requires time $n{2-o(1)}$ under the 4SUM conjecture. (3) The above lower bounds are almost tight when one of the polygons is of constant size: we obtain an $\tilde O((pq){2.5})$-time algorithm for orthogonal polygons $P,Q$ with $p$ and $q$ vertices, respectively. (4) Finding the largest copy of $P$ that can be arbitrarily rotated and translated into $Q$ requires time $n{3-o(1)}$ under the 5SUM conjecture. We are not aware of any other such natural $($degree of freedom $+ 1)$-SUM hardness for a geometric optimization problem.

Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.