Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 97 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 92 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 468 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 175 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Quantitative CLT for linear eigenvalue statistics of Wigner matrices (2103.05402v2)

Published 9 Mar 2021 in math.PR, math-ph, math.MP, math.ST, and stat.TH

Abstract: In this article, we establish a near-optimal convergence rate for the CLT of linear eigenvalue statistics of Wigner matrices, in Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance. For all test functions $f\in C5(\mathbb R)$, we show that the convergence rate is either $N{-1/2+\varepsilon}$ or $N{-1+\varepsilon}$, depending on the first Chebyshev coefficient of $f$ and the third moment of the diagonal matrix entries. The condition that distinguishes these two rates is necessary and sufficient. For a general class of test functions, we further identify matching lower bounds for the convergence rates. In addition, we identify an explicit, non-universal contribution in the linear eigenvalue statistics, which is responsible for the slow rate $N{-1/2+\varepsilon}$ for non-Gaussian ensembles. By removing this non-universal part, we show that the shifted linear eigenvalue statistics have the unified convergence rate $N{-1+\varepsilon}$ for all test functions.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)