Dense outlier detection and open-set recognition based on training with noisy negative images (2101.09193v3)
Abstract: Deep convolutional models often produce inadequate predictions for inputs foreign to the training distribution. Consequently, the problem of detecting outlier images has recently been receiving a lot of attention. Unlike most previous work, we address this problem in the dense prediction context in order to be able to locate outlier objects in front of in-distribution background. Our approach is based on two reasonable assumptions. First, we assume that the inlier dataset is related to some narrow application field (e.g.~road driving). Second, we assume that there exists a general-purpose dataset which is much more diverse than the inlier dataset (e.g.~ImageNet-1k). We consider pixels from the general-purpose dataset as noisy negative training samples since most (but not all) of them are outliers. We encourage the model to recognize borders between known and unknown by pasting jittered negative patches over inlier training images. Our experiments target two dense open-set recognition benchmarks (WildDash 1 and Fishyscapes) and one dense open-set recognition dataset (StreetHazard). Extensive performance evaluation indicates competitive potential of the proposed approach.
- The mapillary vistas dataset for semantic understanding of street scenes, in: ICCV, 2017, pp. 5000–5009.
- Scene parsing through ade20k dataset, in: CVPR, 2017, pp. 633–641.
- Deep gated attention networks for large-scale street-level scene segmentation, Pattern Recognition 88 (2019) 702–714.
- Synthesize then compare: Detecting failures and anomalies for semantic segmentation, in: ECCV, 2020.
- A. Kendall, Y. Gal, What uncertainties do we need in bayesian deep learning for computer vision?, in: NIPS, 2017, pp. 5574–5584.
- Do deep generative models know what they don’t know?, in: ICLR, 2019.
- The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge, Int. J. Comp. Vis. 88 (2010) 303–338.
- The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding, in: CVPR, 2016, pp. 3213–3223.
- Wilddash - creating hazard-aware benchmarks, in: ECCV, 2018, pp. 407–421.
- A benchmark for anomaly segmentation, arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.11132 (2019).
- Probability models for open set recognition, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 36 (2014) 2317–2324.
- Fishyscapes: A benchmark for safe semantic segmentation in autonomous driving, in: ICCVW, 2019, pp. 2403–2412.
- Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization, in: ICLR, 2017.
- Discriminative out-of-distribution detection for semantic segmentation, arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.07703 (2018).
- Simultaneous semantic segmentation and outlier detection in presence of domain shift, in: GCPR, 2019, pp. 33–47.
- D. Hendrycks, K. Gimpel, A baseline for detecting misclassified and out-of-distribution examples in neural networks, in: ICLR, 2017.
- On calibration of modern neural networks, in: ICML, 2017, pp. 1321–1330.
- Enhancing the reliability of out-of-distribution image detection in neural networks, in: ICLR, 2018.
- Y. Gal, Z. Ghahramani, Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning, in: ICML, 2016, p. 1050–1059.
- Uninformed students: Student-teacher anomaly detection with discriminative latent embeddings, in: CVPR, 2020, pp. 4182–4191.
- T. DeVries, G. W. Taylor, Learning confidence for out-of-distribution detection in neural networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.04865 (2018).
- Hybrid models for open set recognition, in: ECCV, 2020.
- E. Hüllermeier, W. Waegeman, Aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in machine learning: A tutorial introduction, arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.09457 (2019).
- L. Smith, Y. Gal, Understanding measures of uncertainty for adversarial example detection, in: UAI, 2018, pp. 560–569.
- A. Malinin, M. Gales, Predictive uncertainty estimation via prior networks, in: NeurIPS, 2018, pp. 7047–7058.
- Training confidence-calibrated classifiers for detecting out-of-distribution samples, in: ICLR, 2018.
- Deep anomaly detection with outlier exposure, in: ICLR, 2019.
- Your classifier is secretly an energy based model and you should treat it like one, in: ICLR, 2020.
- Adversarially learned anomaly detection, in: ICDM, 2018, pp. 727–736.
- Multi-head enhanced self-attention network for novelty detection, Pattern Recognit. 107 (2020) 107486.
- P. Perera, V. M. Patel, Learning deep features for one-class classification, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 28 (2019) 5450–5463.
- MSeg: A composite dataset for multi-domain semantic segmentation, in: CVPR, 2020, pp. 2876–2885.
- Efficient ladder-style densenets for semantic segmentation of large images, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. (2020) 1–11.
- Pyramid scene parsing network, in: CVPR, 2017, pp. 6230–6239.
- Ladder-style densenets for semantic segmentation of large natural images, in: ICCV CVRSUAD, 2017, pp. 238–245.
- Efficacy of pixel-level OOD detection for semantic segmentation, arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.02897 (2019).
- Lsun: Construction of a large-scale image dataset using deep learning with humans in the loop, arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.03365 (2015).
- Lost and found: detecting small road hazards for self-driving vehicles, in: IROS, 2016, pp. 1099 – 1106.
- One versus all for deep neural network incertitude (OVNNI) quantification, aarXiv:2006.00954 (2020).
- Dilated residual networks, in: CVPR, 2017, pp. 636–644.
- Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation, in: ECCV, 2018, pp. 801–818.
- In-place activated batchnorm for memory-optimized training of dnns, in: CVPR, 2017, pp. 5639–5647.
- P. Meletis, G. Dubbelman, Training of convolutional networks on multiple heterogeneous datasets for street scene semantic segmentation, in: IV, 2018, pp. 1045–1050.
- ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge, Inter. Jour. of Comput. Vision 115 (2015) 211–252.
- Scratchdet: Training single-shot object detectors from scratch, in: CVPR, 2019, pp. 2263–2272.
- Tradi: Tracking deep neural network weight distributions, in: ECCV, 2020, pp. 105–121.
- Petra Bevandić (17 papers)
- Ivan Krešo (7 papers)
- Marin Oršić (12 papers)
- Siniša Šegvić (38 papers)