Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 87 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 105 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 471 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 193 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

M Theory from F Theory (2010.09564v1)

Published 19 Oct 2020 in hep-th

Abstract: We write down a $GL(D+1)$ (D for the dimension of string theory) manifest fundamental brane worldvolume current algebra description of M theory, which consists of a pair of vector field $Xm$ and dual 2-form field $X_{mn}$, compositing together to parametrize the spacetime, with a selfduality condition for sectioning. The worldvolume of the brane itself is a (D+2) dimensional object, and the background spacetime after sectioning has dimension (D+1). We summarize the features of the algebra. The field contents of the corresponding background geometry, the usual vielbein $e_a{}m$ and the 3-form $A_{mnp}$, could be identified as different blocks of the composite spacetime vielbein, by solving the orthogonality condition. Their behaviour under gauge transformation are also determined by the corresponding rules of the composite vielbein. Then by solving F theory $\mathcal{V}$ constraints, we reduce the number of worldvolume and show how to recover M theory from F theory.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)