Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 62 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 93 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 213 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 458 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

CO-to-H$_2$ Conversion and Spectral Column Density in Molecular Clouds: The Vriability of $X_{\rm CO}$ Factor (2007.03413v1)

Published 4 Jul 2020 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: Analyzing the Galactic plane CO survey with the Nobeyama 45-m telescope, we compared the spectral column density (SCD) of H$2$ calculated for ${12}$CO line using the current conversion factor $X{\rm CO}$ to that for ${13}$CO line under LTE in M16 and W43 regions. Here, SCD is defined by $dN_{\rm H_2}/dv$ with $N_{\rm H_2}$ and $v$ being the column density and radial velocity, respectively. It is found that the $X_{\rm CO}$ method significantly under-estimates the H$2$ density in a cloud or region, where SCD exceeds a critical value ($ \sim 3\times 10{21}\ [{\rm H_2 \ cm{-2} \ (km \ s{-1}){-1}}]$), but over-estimates in lower SCD regions. We point out that the actual CO-to-H$_2$ conversion factor varies with the H$_2$ column density or with the CO-line intensity: It increases in the inner and opaque parts of molecular clouds, whereas it decreases in the low-density envelopes. However, in so far as the current $X{\rm CO}$ is used combined with the integrated ${12}$CO intensity averaged over an entire cloud, it yields a consistent value with that calculated using the ${13}$CO intensity by LTE. Based on the analysis, we propose a new CO-to-\Htwo conversion relation, $N_{\rm H_2}* = \int X_{\rm CO}*(T_{\rm B}) T_{\rm B} dv$, where $X_{\rm CO}*=(T_{\rm B}/T_{\rm B}*)\beta X_{\rm CO}$ is the modified spectral conversion factor as a function of the brightness temperature, $T_{\rm B}$, of the ${12}$CO ($J=1-0$) line, and $\beta\sim 1-2$ and $T_{\rm B}*=12-16$ K are empirical constants obtained by fitting to the observed data. The formula corrects for the over/under estimation of the column density at low/high-CO line intensities, and is applicable to molecular clouds with $T_{\rm B} \ge 1$ K (rms noise in the data) from envelope to cores at sub-parsec scales (resolution). (Full resolution copy available at http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~sofue/news/2020_mn_Xco12co13_fugin.pdf)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.