A Systematic Guide to Preparing Manuscripts for CVPR Proceedings
This paper provides comprehensive guidelines for authors preparing manuscripts for submission to the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). The document emphasizes the importance of adhering to prescribed formatting and stylistic conventions to ensure consistent presentation across conference submissions. The instructions cover a myriad of aspects, from abstract creation and manuscript language requirements to the nuances of dual submissions and page length constraints.
Key Content Overview
The paper delineates several crucial instructions for authors:
- Manuscript Length and Structure: The guidelines strictly enforce an eight-page limit for submissions, excluding the references. Overlength papers will not be considered for review. Authors are advised to maintain standard formatting as deviations might result in rejection.
- Blind Review Protocol: The importance of properly anonymizing submissions for the purpose of blind review is highlighted. Clear instructions are provided on how to reference one's own work to maintain anonymity.
- Formatting Specifications: Detailed prescriptions for formatting, including column width, text alignment, and section headings, are outlined. The use of specific fonts like Times Roman and the correct presentation of figures, tables, and footnotes is emphasized.
- Mathematics and Equations: Authors must ensure all displayed equations and sections within the text are numbered for ease of reference. This facilitates clarity in academic discourse and peer review.
- Usage of Supplementary Materials: While the main submission must stand on its own, authors can make additional materials available, such as technical reports or parallel submissions, provided they do not compromise the anonymity of the authors.
Practical Implications
The paper plays a pivotal role in maintaining the quality and uniformity of submissions to CVPR, a premier conference in the field of computer vision. By adhering to the guidelines, authors can ensure their manuscripts are effectively reviewed and presented, minimizing delays or revisions due to formatting issues. Such stanardization supports smoother proceedings and fosters a professional presentation of research.
Theoretical Implications and Future Directions
Although primarily procedural, these guidelines underscore the broader academic practices essential for scholarly communication. Disciplined adherence to such protocols can enhance the dissemination and impact of research outputs. Looking forward, the evolution of submission guidelines might incorporate more dynamic formats, responding to technological advancements in publishing and display, such as interactive elements or multimedia content.
The proposed framework also hints at potential areas for future research exploration. Automated tools for verifying adherence to such detailed manuscript requirements could be developed, incorporating AI-based solutions to assist authors during manuscript preparation.
Overall, the paper serves as an indispensable resource for authors aiming to submit to CVPR, laying a cornerstone for both current and successive frameworks of academic publishing within the domain.