Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 74 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 55 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 109 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 212 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 464 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Moment Conditions for Dynamic Panel Logit Models with Fixed Effects (2005.05942v7)

Published 12 May 2020 in econ.EM

Abstract: This paper investigates the construction of moment conditions in discrete choice panel data with individual specific fixed effects. We describe how to systematically explore the existence of moment conditions that do not depend on the fixed effects, and we demonstrate how to construct them when they exist. Our approach is closely related to the numerical "functional differencing" construction in Bonhomme (2012), but our emphasis is to find explicit analytic expressions for the moment functions. We first explain the construction and give examples of such moment conditions in various models. Then, we focus on the dynamic binary choice logit model and explore the implications of the moment conditions for identification and estimation of the model parameters that are common to all individuals.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (35)
  1. Altonji, J. G., and L. M. Segal (1996): “Small-Sample Bias in GMM Estimation of Covariance Structures,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 14(3), 353–366.
  2. Andersen, E. B. (1970): “Asymptotic properties of conditional maximum-likelihood estimators,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 32(2), 283–301.
  3. Aristodemou, E. (2018): “Semiparametric Identification in Panel Data Discrete Response Models,” Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 2018-065/III.
  4. Bonhomme, S. (2012): “Functional differencing,” Econometrica, 80(4), 1337–1385.
  5. Bonhomme, S., K. Dano, and B. Graham (2022): “Sequential Moment Restrictions in Nonlinear Panel Models with Fixed Effects,” Working paper.
  6. Chamberlain, G. (1985): “Heterogeneity, Omitted Variable Bias, and Duration Dependence,” in Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data, ed. by J. J. Heckman, and B. Singer, no. 10 in Econometric Society Monographs series, pp. 3–38. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York and Sydney.
  7.    (2010): “Binary response models for panel data: Identification and information,” Econometrica, 78(1), 159–168.
  8.    (2023): “Identification in dynamic binary choice models,” SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, 14(3), 247–251.
  9. Cox, D. R. (1958): “The regression analysis of binary sequences,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 20(2), 215–232.
  10. Dano, K. (2023): “Transition Probabilities and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Fixed Effects Logit Models,” https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.00083.
  11. Davezies, L., X. D’Haultfoeuille, and M. Mugnier (2022): “Fixed Effects Binary Choice Models with Three or More Periods,” Quantitative Economics (forthcoming).
  12. Dobronyi, C., J. Gu, and K. i. Kim (2021): “Identification of Dynamic Panel Logit Models with Fixed Effects,” https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.04590.
  13. Gayle, G.-L., and A. Shephard (2019): “Optimal Taxation, Marriage, Home Production, and Family Labor Supply,” Econometrica, 87(1), 291–326.
  14. Hahn, J. (2001): “The Information Bound of a Dynamic Panel Logit Model With Fixed Effects,” Econometric Theory, 17(5), 913–932.
  15. Heckman, J. J. (1978): “Simple Statistical Models for Discrete Panel Data Developed and Applied to Tests of the Hypothesis of True State Dependence against the Hypothesis of Spurious State Dependence,” Annales de l’INSEE, pp. 227–269.
  16. Honoré, B. E. (1992): “Trimmed LAD and Least Squares Estimation of Truncated and Censored Regression Models with Fixed Effects,” Econometrica, 60, 533–565.
  17.    (1993): “Orthogonality conditions for Tobit models with fixed effects and lagged dependent variables,” Journal of Econometrics, 59(1), 35–61.
  18. Honoré, B. E., and E. Kyriazidou (2000): “Panel data discrete choice models with lagged dependent variables,” Econometrica, 68(4), 839–874.
  19. Honoré, B. E., and E. Kyriazidou (2019): “Identification in Binary Response Panel Data Models: Is Point-Identification More Common Than We Thought?,” Annals of Economics and Statistics, (134), 207–226.
  20. Honoré, B. E., C. Muris, and M. Weidner (2021): “Dynamic Ordered Panel Logit Models,” https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03253.
  21. Honoré, B. E., and M. Weidner (2022): “Moment Conditions for Dynamic Panel Logit Models with Fixed Effects,” https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.05942v6.
  22. Hu, L. (2002): “Estimation of a Censored Dynamic Panel Data Model,” Econometrica, 70(6), pp. 2499–2517.
  23. Johnson, E. G. (2004): “Identification in discrete choice models with fixed effects,” in Working paper, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Citeseer.
  24. Khan, S., M. Ponomareva, and E. Tamer (2019): “Identification of Dynamic Panel Binary Response Models,” Discussion paper, Boston College Department of Economics.
  25. Kitazawa, Y. (2013): “Exploration of dynamic fixed effects logit models from a traditional angle,” Discussion paper, No. 60, Kyushu Sangyo University Faculty of Economics.
  26.    (2016): “Root-N consistent estimations of time dummies for the dynamic fixed effects logit models: Monte Carlo illustrations,” Discussion paper, No. 72, Kyushu Sangyo University Faculty of Economics.
  27.    (2022): “Transformations and moment conditions for dynamic fixed effects logit models,” Journal of Econometrics, 229(2), 350–362.
  28. Kruiniger, H. (2020): “Further results on the estimation of dynamic panel logit models with fixed effects,” https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.03382.
  29. Magnac, T. (2000): “Subsidised training and youth employment: distinguishing unobserved heterogeneity from state dependence in labour market histories,” The economic journal, 110(466), 805–837.
  30.    (2004): “Panel binary variables and sufficiency: generalizing conditional logit,” Econometrica, 72(6), 1859–1876.
  31. Manski, C. (1987): “Semiparametric Analysis of Random Effects Linear Models from Binary Panel Data,” Econometrica, 55, 357–62.
  32. Newey, W. K., and D. McFadden (1994): “Large Sample Estimation and Hypothesis Testing,” in Handbook of Econometrics, ed. by R. F. Engle, and D. L. McFadden, no. 4 in Handbooks in Economics,, pp. 2111–2245. Elsevier, North-Holland, Amsterdam, London and New York.
  33. Neyman, J., and E. L. Scott (1948): “Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations,” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pp. 1–32.
  34. Pakes, A., J. Porter, M. Shepard, and S. Calder-Wang (2022): “Unobserved Heterogeneity, State Dependence, and Health Plan Choices,” Working paper. Revised Sept. 2022.
  35. Rasch, G. (1960b): Studies in mathematical psychology: I. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Nielsen & Lydiche.
Citations (25)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

Explore Trending Papers

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube