Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Deep learning for cardiac image segmentation: A review (1911.03723v1)

Published 9 Nov 2019 in eess.IV, cs.CV, cs.LG, and q-bio.QM

Abstract: Deep learning has become the most widely used approach for cardiac image segmentation in recent years. In this paper, we provide a review of over 100 cardiac image segmentation papers using deep learning, which covers common imaging modalities including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and ultrasound (US) and major anatomical structures of interest (ventricles, atria and vessels). In addition, a summary of publicly available cardiac image datasets and code repositories are included to provide a base for encouraging reproducible research. Finally, we discuss the challenges and limitations with current deep learning-based approaches (scarcity of labels, model generalizability across different domains, interpretability) and suggest potential directions for future research.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Chen Chen (753 papers)
  2. Chen Qin (52 papers)
  3. Huaqi Qiu (18 papers)
  4. Giacomo Tarroni (27 papers)
  5. Jinming Duan (48 papers)
  6. Wenjia Bai (80 papers)
  7. Daniel Rueckert (335 papers)
Citations (620)

Summary

Deep Learning for Cardiac Image Segmentation: A Comprehensive Review

This review paper provides an in-depth analysis of deep learning (DL) methodologies applied to cardiac image segmentation. With over 100 reviewed papers, the authors cover various imaging modalities, including MRI, CT, and ultrasound (US), focusing on major anatomical structures such as the ventricles, atria, and vessels. The discussion is structured to address the strengths, limitations, and future research directions in DL-based cardiac segmentation.

Imaging Modalities and Techniques

The paper categorizes DL methods across three primary imaging modalities:

  • MRI: This modality serves as the benchmark for cardiac imaging, providing valuable anatomical and functional insights without ionizing radiation. The majority of research efforts in DL have targeted MRI, reflecting its critical role in cardiovascular assessment.
  • CT: Used primarily for coronary artery assessment, CT imaging methodologies have seen DL applications focusing on coronary artery and calcium segmentation.
  • Ultrasound: Known for real-time capabilities and portability, ultrasound presents unique challenges due to low resolution and noise. Despite these hurdles, DL methods have been developed for the segmentation of structures such as the left ventricle (LV).

Deep Learning Architectures

The review highlights that convolutional neural networks (CNNs), particularly U-net and its variants, are the predominant architectures in cardiac image segmentation. These networks are capable of end-to-end learning, significantly improving segmentation accuracy and efficiency over traditional methods.

Key trends in enhancing DL models include:

  • Advanced Architectural Designs: Use of inception modules, dilated convolutions, and skip connections to improve feature extraction.
  • Robust Loss Functions: Incorporating weighted loss functions to address class imbalance issues.
  • Multi-Stage and Multi-Task Learning: Leveraging multiple networks to refine segmentations and exploit related tasks for improved learning.
  • Incorporation of Anatomical Constraints: Regularizing networks using shape priors or adversarial training to ensure anatomically plausible segmentations.

Challenges and Future Directions

Despite substantial advancements, the paper acknowledges existing challenges that hinder clinical translation:

  • Scarcity of Labeled Data: Acquiring large, diverse, and well-annotated datasets remains a bottleneck. The authors discuss alternatives such as transfer learning, weakly supervised learning, and self-supervised methods to mitigate this issue.
  • Model Generalization: Ensuring consistency across different imaging devices and patient populations is critical. Techniques like unsupervised domain adaptation and enhanced data augmentation strategies are highlighted as potential solutions.
  • Interpretability and Reliability: The black-box nature of DL models poses risks, necessitating efforts to improve transparency through techniques like uncertainty quantification and failure awareness.

Implications and Conclusion

The adoption of DL for cardiac image segmentation has led to significant improvements in speed and accuracy, providing an essential foundation for future advances. However, the paper emphasizes that widespread clinical deployment requires addressing data scarcity, improving model generalization, and ensuring model interpretability.

Future research is likely to explore smart imaging integration, standardized data protocols, and privacy-preserving techniques, advancing cardiac image analysis and enhancing clinical decision-making. This comprehensive review serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners aiming to understand and build upon the current landscape of DL in cardiac image segmentation.