Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 72 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 57 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 43 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 219 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Set systems related to a house allocation problem (1910.04666v1)

Published 10 Oct 2019 in math.CO

Abstract: We are given a set $A$ of buyers, a set $B$ of houses, and for each buyer a preference list, i.e., an ordering of the houses. A house allocation is an injective mapping $\tau$ from $A$ to $B$, and $\tau$ is strictly better than another house allocation $\tau'\neq \tau$ if for every buyer $i$, $\tau'(i)$ does not come before $\tau(i)$ in the preference list of $i$. A house allocation is Pareto optimal if there is no strictly better house allocation. Let $s(\tau)$ be the image of $\tau$ (i.e., the set of houses sold in the house allocation $\tau$). We are interested in the largest possible cardinality $f(m)$ of the family of sets $s(\tau)$ for Pareto optimal mappings $\tau$ taken over all sets of preference lists of $m$ buyers. We improve the earlier upper bound on $f(m)$ given by Asinowski, Keszegh and Miltzow by making a connection between this problem and some problems in extremal set theory.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.