Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
AI Research Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 83 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 92 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 174 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 462 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Bayesian Inference of High-density Nuclear Symmetry Energy from Radii of Canonical Neutron Stars (1907.10741v2)

Published 24 Jul 2019 in astro-ph.HE, astro-ph.SR, nucl-ex, and nucl-th

Abstract: The radius $R_{1.4}$ of neutron stars (NSs) with a mass of 1.4 M${\odot}$ has been extracted consistently in many recent studies in the literature. Using representative $R{1.4}$ data, we infer high-density nuclear symmetry energy $E_{\rm{sym}}(\rho)$ and the associated nucleon specific energy $E_0(\rho)$ in symmetric nuclear matter (SNM) within a Bayesian statistical approach using an explicitly isospin-dependent parametric Equation of State (EOS) for nucleonic matter. We found that: (1) The available astrophysical data can already improve significantly our current knowledge about the EOS in the density range of $\rho_0-2.5\rho_0$. In particular, the symmetry energy at twice the saturation density $\rho_0$ of nuclear matter is determined to be $E_{\mathrm{sym}}(2\rho_0)$ =39.2${-8.2}{+12.1}$ MeV at 68\% confidence level. (2) A precise measurement of the $R{1.4}$ alone with a 4\% 1$\sigma$ statistical error but no systematic error will not improve much the constraints on the EOS of dense neutron-rich nucleonic matter compared to what we extracted from using the available radius data. (3) The $R_{1.4}$ radius data and other general conditions, such as the observed NS maximum mass and causality condition introduce strong correlations for the high-order EOS parameters. Consequently, the high-density behavior of $E_{\rm{sym}}(\rho)$ inferred depends strongly on how the high-density SNM EOS $E_0(\rho)$ is parameterized, and vice versa. (4) The value of the observed maximum NS mass and whether it is used as a sharp cut-off for the minimum maximum mass or through a Gaussian distribution affect significantly the lower boundaries of both the $E_0(\rho)$ and $E_{\rm{sym}}(\rho)$ only at densities higher than about $2.5\rho_0$.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.