Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 44 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 86 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 208 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Chemically Accurate 0-0 Energies with not-so-Accurate Excited State Geometries (1810.13035v1)

Published 30 Oct 2018 in physics.chem-ph and physics.comp-ph

Abstract: Using a series of increasingly refined wavefunction methods able to tackle electronic excited states, namely ADC(2), CC2, CCSD, CCSDR(3) and CC3, we investigate the interplay between geometries and 0-0 energies. We show that, due to a strong and nearly systematic error cancelation between the vertical transition and geometrical reorganization energies, CC2 and CCSD structures can be used to obtain chemically-accurate 0-0 energies, though the underlying geometries are rather far from the reference ones and would deliver significant errors for many chemical and physical properties. This indicates that obtaining 0-0 energies matching experiment does not demonstrate the quality of the geometrical parameters. In contrast, accurate computation of vertical excitation energies is mandatory in order to reach chemical accuracy. By determining CC3 total energies on CCSD structures, we model a large set of compounds (including radicals) and electronic transitions (including singlet-triplet excitations) and successfully reach chemical accuracy in a near systematic way. Indeed, for this particular set, our protocol delivers a mean absolute error as small as $0.032$ eV, chemical accuracy (error smaller than $1$ kcal.mol${-1}$ or $0.043$ eV) being obtained in 80\%\ of the cases. In only three cases the error exceeds $0.15$ eV which is of the order of the typical error provided by TD-DFT or second-order wavefunction methods for this particular property. The present composite protocol is therefore very effective despite the fact that the geometries may not be considered as very accurate.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube