Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 82 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 96 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 179 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 473 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

On the relationships between Stieltjes type integrals of Young, Dushnik and Kurzweil (1806.07954v1)

Published 7 Jun 2018 in math.CA

Abstract: Integral equations of the form $$ x(t)=x(t_0)+\int_{t_0}t d[A]\,x=f(t)-f(t_0)$$ are natural generalizations of systems of linear differential equations. Their main goal is that they admit solutions which need not be absolutely continuous. Up to now such equations have been considered by several authors starting with J. Kurzweil and T.H. Hildebrandt. These authors worked with several different concepts of the Stieltjes type integral like Young's (Hildebrandt), Kurzweil's (Kurzweil, Schwabik and Tvrd\'{y}), Dushnik's (H\"{o}nig) or Lebesgue's (Ashordia, Meng and Zhang). Thus an interesting question arises: what are the relationships between all these concepts? Our aim is to give an answer to this question. In addition, we present also convergence results that are new for the Young and Dushnik integrals. Let us emphasize that the proofs of all the assertions presented in this paper are based on rather elementary tools.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.