Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
AI Research Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 89 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 43 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 112 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 199 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 449 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Monojet Signatures from Heavy Colored Particles: Future Collider Sensitivities and Theoretical Uncertainties (1805.05346v2)

Published 14 May 2018 in hep-ph and hep-ex

Abstract: In models with colored particle $\mathcal{Q}$ that can decay into a dark matter candidate $X$, the relevant collider process $pp\to \mathcal{Q}\bar{\mathcal{Q}}\rightarrow X\bar{X}+$jets gives rise to events with significant transverse momentum imbalance. When the masses of $\mathcal{Q}$ and $X$ are very close, the relevant signature becomes monojet-like, and Large Hadron Collider (LHC) search limits become much less constraining. In this paper, we study the current and anticipated experimental sensitivity to such particles at the High-Luminosity LHC at $\sqrt{s}=14\,\mathrm{TeV}$ with $\mathcal{L}=3\,\mathrm{ab}{-1}$ of data and the proposed High-Energy LHC at $\sqrt{s}=27\,\mathrm{TeV}$ with $\mathcal{L}=15\,\mathrm{ab}{-1}$ of data. We estimate the reach for various Lorentz and QCD color representations of $\mathcal{Q}$. Identifying the nature of $\mathcal{Q}$ is very important to understanding the physics behind the monojet signature. Therefore, we also study the dependence of the observables built from the $pp\to\mathcal{Q}\bar{\mathcal{Q}} + j $ process on $\mathcal{Q}$ itself. Using the state-of-the-art Monte Carlo suites MadGraph5_aMC@NLO+Pythia8 and Sherpa, we find that when these observables are calculated at NLO in QCD with parton shower matching and multijet merging, the residual theoretical uncertainties are comparable to differences observed when varying the quantum numbers of $\mathcal{Q}$ itself. We find, however, that the precision achievable with NNLO calculations, where available, can resolve this dilemma.

Citations (7)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.