- The paper details the comprehensive LaTeX author guidelines for preparing and submitting manuscripts to ICCV proceedings.
- Key specifications cover manuscript length, formatting intricacies, blind review considerations, and the use of mathematical expressions and citations.
- Adherence to these guidelines ensures manuscript standardization, facilitates the blind review process, and improves the clarity and presentation of research findings.
Examination of \LaTeX\ Author Guidelines for ICCV Proceedings
The document under review is a comprehensive guide for authors submitting papers to ICCV proceedings, specifically focusing on formatting and submission requirements using \LaTeX. The guidelines are detailed, addressing the critical aspects of manuscript preparation to ensure consistency and adherence to the conference standards. Researchers familiar with academic writing and \LaTeX will appreciate the structured approach this document offers.
Abstract and Introduction Format
The abstract is to be formatted with exact specifications, including italicized text, font size, and placement, emphasizing adherence to previous ICCV styles. This ensures abstracts are concise yet informative and fit within stipulated character limits. The introduction provides a roadmap for compliance, noting essential distinctions in the latest version of guidelines, signifying that it supersedes earlier recommendations.
Manuscript Specifications
Key specifications for manuscript submission include language requirements, paper length, and formatting intricacies. The dual submission policy underscores the conference's stance on manuscript originality and exclusivity. Modern updates to paper length restrictions necessitate author diligence to avoid rejection without review, highlighting the importance of compliance with formatting details such as text area dimensions, column width, and margin settings.
Use of Ruler in Reviewing
A novel feature, the printed ruler, is meant to enhance reviewer comments' accuracy, facilitating easier reference to specific manuscript sections despite its complexity in alignment. This specification illustrates an attempt to streamline the review process without compromising document aesthetics in the final submission.
Blind Review Considerations
The guidelines discuss anonymization for blind review, clarifying common misconceptions like authors needing to omit self-citations. The nuanced distinction assists researchers in maintaining the integrity of their scholarly work while complying with anonymity standards.
Mathematical and Citation Formats
Mathematical expressions necessitate numbering, supporting references that facilitate scholarly discussion. Citation conventions follow a structured format to conserve space and ensure alignment with academic standards. Such meticulousness suggests a balanced approach to showcasing research findings while respecting ICCV’s concise documentation traditions.
Formatting and Style
The document specifies type-styles, margins, and page numbering, ensuring the uniformity of published manuscripts. The precise guidelines for sections, headings, and footnotes aim at maintaining academic rigor while accommodating creative expression within the bounds of specified typographical standards.
Graphical Elements and Their Integration
Graphs and illustrations must be centered and scaled effectively, promoting readability in both electronic and print formats. This consideration underscores the document's practical approach to visual data representation, reflecting an understanding of how research is consumed across different mediums.
Implications
While the guidelines primarily focus on technical aspects, they indirectly influence the quality and impact of submitted research through stringent structural requirements. Adherence to these details ensures that papers not only meet technical standards but also convey ideas with clarity and precision, potentially influencing AI developments discussed at ICCV. Future considerations in AI documentation may further refine these guidelines, integrating evolving technological standards with academic traditions.
In conclusion, the \LaTeX\ Author Guidelines for ICCV Proceedings highlight the critical aspects of manuscript preparation and submission. By ensuring standardization and compliance, these guidelines contribute to the advancement of academic discourse in computer vision and associated research fields.