Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 88 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 110 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 470 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 197 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Infinite Matrix Product States vs Infinite Projected Entangled-Pair States on the Cylinder: a comparative study (1705.03222v1)

Published 9 May 2017 in physics.comp-ph and cond-mat.other

Abstract: In spite of their intrinsic one-dimensional nature matrix product states have been systematically used to obtain remarkably accurate results for two-dimensional systems. Motivated by basic entropic arguments favoring projected entangled-pair states as the method of choice, we assess the relative performance of infinite matrix product states and infinite projected entangled-pair states on cylindrical geometries. By considering the Heisenberg and half-filled Hubbard models on the square lattice as our benchmark cases, we evaluate their variational energies as a function of both bond dimension as well as cylinder width. In both examples we find crossovers at moderate cylinder widths, i.e. for the largest bond dimensions considered we find an improvement on the variational energies for the Heisenberg model by using projected entangled-pair states at a width of about 11 sites, whereas for the half-filled Hubbard model this crossover occurs at about 7 sites.

Citations (10)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.