Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 94 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 57 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 28 tok/s
GPT-5 High 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 100 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 461 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 208 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Quantum groups and Nichols algebras acting on conformal field theories (1702.06431v2)

Published 21 Feb 2017 in math.QA, hep-th, math-ph, and math.MP

Abstract: We prove that certain screening operators in conformal field theory obey the algebra relations of a corresponding Nichols algebra with diagonal braiding. Our result proves in particular a long-standing expectation that the Borel parts of small quantum groups appear as the algebra of screening operators. The proof is based on a novel, intimate relation between Hopf algebras, vertex algebras and a class of multivalued analytic special functions, which are generalizations of Selberg integrals. We prove that the zeroes of these special functions correspond to the algebra relations of the respective Nichols algebra, by proving an analytical quantum symmetrizer formula for the functions. Moreover, certain poles of the functions encode module extensions and a Weyl group action. At other poles, the quantum {symmetrizer} formula fails and the screening operators generate an extension of the Nichols algebra. The intended application of our result is the conjectural logarithmic Kazhdan-Lusztig correspondence. More generally, our result seems to suggest that non-local screening operators in an arbitrary vertex algebra should be described by appropriate Nichols algebras, just as local screening operators can be described by Lie algebras.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)