Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
144 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

p-adic approach of Greenberg's conjecture (p-split totally real case) (1611.09592v3)

Published 29 Nov 2016 in math.NT

Abstract: Let k be a totally real number field ant let k$\infty$ be its cyclotomic Zp-extension for a prime p\textgreater{}2. We give (Theorem 3.2) a sufficient condition of nullity of the Iwasawa invariants lambda, mu, when p totally splits in k, and we obtain important tables of quadratic fields and p for which we can conclude that lambda = mu=0.We show that the number of ambiguous p-classes of kn (nth stage in k$\infty$) is equal to the order of the torsion group T, of the Galois group of the maximal Abelian p-ramified pro-p-extension of k (Theorem 4.2), for all n \textgreater{}\textgreater{} e, where pe is the exponent of U*/ adh(E) (in terms of local and global units of k). Then we establish analogs of Chevalley's formula using a family (Lambda_in)_{0$\le$i$\le$m_n} of subgroups of k* containing E, in which any x is norm of an ideal of kn. This family is attached to the classical filtration of the p-class group of kn defining the algorithm of computation of its order in m_n steps. From this, we prove (Theorem 6.1) that m_n $\ge$ (lambda.n + mu.pn + nu)/v_p(T_k) and that the condition m_n = O(1) (i.e., lambda = mu=0) essentially depends on the P-adic valuations of the (xp-1-1)/p, x in Lambda_in, for P I p, so that Greenberg's conjecture is strongly related to "Fermat quotients" in k*. Heuristics and statistical analysis of these Fermat quotients (Sections 6, 7, 8) show that they follow natural probabilities, linked to T_k whatever n, suggesting that lambda = mu=0 (Heuristics 7.1, 7.2, 7.3). This would imply that, for a proof of Greenberg's conjecture, some deep p-adic results (probably out of reach now), having some analogy with Leopoldt's conjecture, are necessary before referring to the sole algebraic Iwasawa theory.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.