Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 27 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 46 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 70 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 117 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 459 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The Strong Decays of X(3940) and X(4160) (1608.05201v2)

Published 18 Aug 2016 in hep-ph

Abstract: The new mesons $X(3940)$ and $X(4160)$ have been found by Belle Collaboration in the processes $e+e-\to J/\psi D{(*)}\bar D{(*)}$. Considering $X(3940)$ and $X(4160)$ as $\eta_c(3S)$ and $\eta_c(4S)$ states, the two-body open charm OZI-allowed strong decay of $\eta_c(3S)$ and $\eta_c(4S)$ are studied by the improved Bethe-Salpeter method combine with the $3P_0$ model. The strong decay width of $\eta_c(3S)$ is $\Gamma_{\eta_c(3S)}=(33.5{+18.4}_{-15.3})$ MeV, which is closed to the result of $X(3940)$, therefore, $\eta_c(3S)$ is a good candidate of $X(3940)$. The strong decay width of $\eta_c(4S)$ is $\Gamma_{\eta_c(4S)}=(69.9{+22.4}_{-21.1})$ MeV, considering the errors of the results, it's closed to the lower limit of $X(4160)$. But the ratio of the decay width $\frac{\Gamma(D\bar D*)}{\Gamma (D*\bar D*)}$ of $\eta_c(4S)$ is larger than the experimental data of $X(4160)$. According to the above analysis, $\eta_c(4S)$ is not the candidate of $X(4160)$, and more investigations of $X(4160)$ is needed.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.