Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 49 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 172 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 472 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Pull-based load distribution among heterogeneous parallel servers: the case of multiple routers (1512.07873v2)

Published 24 Dec 2015 in math.PR

Abstract: The model is a service system, consisting of several large server pools. A server processing speed and buffer size (which may be finite or infinite) depend on the pool. The input flow of customers is split equally among a fixed number of routers, which must assign customers to the servers immediately upon arrival. We consider an asymptotic regime in which the customer total arrival rate and pool sizes scale to infinity simultaneously, in proportion to a scaling parameter $n$, while the number of routers remains fixed. We define and study a multi-router generalization of the pull-based customer assignment (routing) algorithm PULL, introduced in [11] for the single-router model. Under PULL algorithm, when a server becomes idle it send a "pull-message" to a randomly uniformly selected router; each router operates independently -- it assigns an arriving customer to a server according to a randomly uniformly chosen available (at this router) pull-message, if there is any, or to a randomly uniformly selected server in the entire system, otherwise. Under Markov assumptions (Poisson arrival process and independent exponentially distributed service requirements), and under sub-critical system load, we prove asymptotic optimality of PULL: as $n\to\infty$, the steady-state probability of an arriving customer experiencing blocking or waiting, vanishes. Furthermore, PULL has an extremely low router-server message exchange rate of one message per customer. These results generalize some of the single-router results in [11].

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)