Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 84 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 45 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 92 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 425 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 157 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Prestellar Core Formation, Evolution, and Accretion from Gravitational Fragmentation in Turbulent Converging Flows (1504.02140v1)

Published 8 Apr 2015 in astro-ph.SR

Abstract: We investigate prestellar core formation and accretion based on three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations. Our simulations represent local $\sim 1$pc regions within giant molecular clouds where a supersonic turbulent flow converges, triggering star formation in the post-shock layer. We include turbulence and self-gravity, applying sink particle techniques, and explore a range of inflow Mach number ${\cal M}=2-16$. Two sets of cores are identified and compared: $t_1$-cores are identified of a time snapshot in each simulation, representing dense structures in a single cloud map; $t_\mathrm{coll}$-cores are identified at their individual time of collapse, representing the initial mass reservoir for accretion. We find that cores and filaments form and evolve at the same time. At the stage of core collapse, there is a well-defined, converged characteristic mass for isothermal fragmentation that is comparable to the critical Bonner-Ebert mass at the post-shock pressure. The core mass functions (CMFs) of $t_\mathrm{coll}$-cores show a deficit of high-mass cores ($\gtrsim 7M_\odot$) compared to the observed stellar initial mass function (IMF). However, the CMFs of $t_1$-cores are similar to the observed CMFs and include many low-mass cores that are gravitationally stable. The difference between $t_1$-cores and $t_\mathrm{coll}$-cores suggests that the full sample from observed CMFs may not evolve into protostars. Individual sink particles accrete at a roughly constant rate throughout the simulations, gaining one $t_\mathrm{coll}$-core mass per free-fall time even after the initial mass reservoir is accreted. High-mass sinks gain proportionally more mass at late times than low-mass sinks. There are outbursts in accretion rates, resulting from clumpy density structures falling into the sinks.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.