Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 45 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 22 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 99 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 183 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 467 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Data-inspired advances in geometric measure theory: generalized surface and shape metrics (1408.5954v1)

Published 26 Aug 2014 in math.DG

Abstract: Modern geometric measure theory, developed largely to solve the Plateau problem, has generated a great deal of technical machinery which is unfortunately regarded as inaccessible by outsiders. Some of its tools (e.g., flat norm distance and decomposition in generalized surface space) hold interest from a theoretical perspective but computational infeasibility prevented practical use. Others, like nonasymptotic densities as shape signatures, have been developed independently for data analysis (e.g., the integral area invariant). The flat norm measures distance between currents (generalized surfaces) by decomposing them in a way that is robust to noise. The simplicial deformation theorem shows currents can be approximated on a simplicial complex, generalizing the classical cubical deformation theorem and proving sharper bounds than Sullivan's convex cellular deformation theorem. Computationally, the discretized flat norm can be expressed as a linear programming problem and solved in polynomial time. Furthermore, the solution is guaranteed to be integral for integral input if the complex satisfies a simple topological condition (absence of relative torsion). This discretized integrality result yields a similar statement for the continuous case: the flat norm decomposition of an integral 1-current in the plane can be taken to be integral, something previously unknown for 1-currents which are not boundaries of 2-currents. Nonasymptotic densities (integral area invariants) taken along the boundary of a shape are often enough to reconstruct the shape. This result is easy when the densities are known for arbitrarily small radii but that is not generally possible in practice. When only a single radius is used, variations on reconstruction results (modulo translation and rotation) of polygons and (a dense set of) smooth curves are presented.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube