Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 71 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 196 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 467 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

On the Theory of Continuous-Spin Particles: Helicity Correspondence in Radiation and Forces (1302.1577v2)

Published 6 Feb 2013 in hep-th and hep-ph

Abstract: We have recently shown that continuous-spin particles (CSPs) have covariant single-emission amplitudes with the requisite properties to mediate long-range forces. CSPs, the most general massless particle type consistent with Lorentz symmetry, are characterized by a scale \rho. Here, we demonstrate a helicity correspondence at CSP energies larger than \rho, in which these amplitudes are well approximated by the familiar ones for particles of helicity 0, 1, or 2. These properties follow from Lorentz invariance. We also construct tree-level multi-emission and CSP-exchange amplitudes that are unitary, appropriately analytic, and consistent with helicity-0 correspondence. We propose sewing rules from which these amplitudes and others can be obtained. We also exhibit a candidate CSP-graviton matrix element, which shows that the Weinberg-Witten theorem does not apply to CSPs. These results raise the surprising possibility that the known long-range forces might be mediated by CSPs with very small \rho, rather than by helicity 1 and 2 particles.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.