Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Optimal control as a graphical model inference problem (0901.0633v3)

Published 6 Jan 2009 in math.OC and cs.SY

Abstract: We reformulate a class of non-linear stochastic optimal control problems introduced by Todorov (2007) as a Kullback-Leibler (KL) minimization problem. As a result, the optimal control computation reduces to an inference computation and approximate inference methods can be applied to efficiently compute approximate optimal controls. We show how this KL control theory contains the path integral control method as a special case. We provide an example of a block stacking task and a multi-agent cooperative game where we demonstrate how approximate inference can be successfully applied to instances that are too complex for exact computation. We discuss the relation of the KL control approach to other inference approaches to control.

Citations (376)

Summary

  • The paper’s main contribution is reframing stochastic control as a probabilistic inference problem by minimizing KL divergence within dynamic Bayesian networks.
  • It demonstrates the method on tasks like block stacking and a multi-agent stag hunt game, showing enhanced computational efficiency and coordination.
  • The approach opens new avenues for employing approximate inference techniques, such as belief propagation, to traditionally complex control problems.

A Formal Analysis of "Optimal Control as a Graphical Model Inference Problem"

The paper "Optimal Control as a Graphical Model Inference Problem" presents a novel approach to stochastic optimal control problems by reframing them as inference tasks within graphical models. The authors, Hilbert J. Kappen, Vicenç Gómez, and Manfred Opper, propose representing these control problems using Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence minimization, thus transforming a typically cumbersome computation into one amendable to standard inference techniques.

Overview

The core contribution of this work is converting a class of stochastic control problems into an equivalent problem of minimizing a KL divergence in a dynamic Bayesian network. The approach iteratively optimizes the expected cost by modeling the control problem as one of probabilistic inference. The authors incorporate the concept of free dynamics, which represents uncontrolled dynamics, and quantify control costs as deviations from these dynamics, expressible in terms of KL divergence. The novelty lies in aligning the dynamic programming facet of control problems with statistical inference methodologies.

Methodology and Results

The paper explores two prominent examples to demonstrate the efficacy of their approach:

  1. Block Stacking Task: This standard AI planning task is reinterpreted within the KL control framework. The solution involves minimizing an entropy-based state cost, reformulated through graphical models to facilitate approximate inference techniques like belief propagation (BP) and the Cluster Variation Method (CVM). The results show that their approach can effectively address the high computational complexity associated with traditional methods.
  2. Multi-Agent Cooperative Game: Specifically, a multi-agent version of the stag hunt game is explored. The authors employ factor graphs to lay out the cooperative game's dynamics and reveal the coordination dynamics among various agents. Through efficient inference (again using BP), they demonstrate that even in larger systems, coherent strategies like risk-dominant and payoff-dominant equilibria emerge clearly for different settings of parameters.

Implications and Future Directions

The reframing of stochastic control as a graphical model inference problem implies potential parity in the application of well-established inference methods to complex control tasks. The pathways this opens for approximate inference algorithms are notable, as they allow application to scenarios previously deemed computationally prohibitive due to the state space's size. The authors illustrate a marginal computation using approximate inference methods that were traditionally bound by the limitations of the BeLLMan equation framework in high-dimensional or continuous state spaces.

The implications stretch towards developing efficient solutions for a myriad of applications, such as robotics, financial management, and large-scale multi-agent systems. By harnessing this inference viewpoint, the paper sets a foundation for future research to extend these methods to more sophisticated control paradigms, potentially embracing learning models that adjust to varying dynamics without explicit model formulations. There's a rich avenue for exploration in disentangling state dynamics and control within the inference framework, an area ripe for both theoretical expansion and practical algorithm design.

In summary, this work represents a pivot in the computational handling of optimal control problems by bridging them with probabilistic methods used extensively in machine learning. It challenges the conventional reliance on dynamic programming in favor of inference frameworks that may better capture the complexity inherent in stochastic control systems. The studies presented support the notion that this paradigm yields computational and conceptual benefits, setting the stage for future explorations into more intricate applications and theoretical underpinnings.