Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 84 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 96 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 462 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 189 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

SynLexLM: Scaling Legal LLMs with Synthetic Data and Curriculum Learning (2504.18762v2)

Published 26 Apr 2025 in cs.CL and cs.LG

Abstract: LLMs are powerful but often require extensive fine-tuning and large datasets for specialized domains like law. General-purpose pre-training may not capture legal nuances, and acquiring sufficient legal data is challenging. We introduce SynLexLM, a novel approach to efficiently pre-train a legal LLM. Our method employs curriculum learning, progressing from simple to complex legal texts and queries, combined with synthetic data augmentation using models like Gemini Pro to address data scarcity. We aim to achieve improved performance on legal benchmarks (BigLaw-Bench, EUR-Lex-Sum) compared to traditional models and fine-tuned versions. Preliminary work involves generating synthetic QA pairs reflecting legal reasoning. This work aims to enhance legal document analysis and research tools, potentially democratizing access to advanced legal AI.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

The paper "SynLexLM: Scaling Legal LLMs with Synthetic Data and Curriculum Learning" investigates the challenges and methods of developing LLMs specifically tailored for the legal domain. Authored by Upadhyay et al., the paper introduces a novel approach that combines synthetic data augmentation and curriculum learning to enhance the performance of legal LLMs such as Gemma 3 12b.

Methodology

The paper addresses fundamental issues in utilizing LLMs in domains requiring specialized knowledge, such as legal environments, and the scarcity of annotated legal data essential for training these models. SynLexLM leverages two core strategies to overcome these hurdles:

  1. Synthetic Data Augmentation: The authors utilize synthetic data generation to provide additional training data. This is achieved through models like Google's Gemini Pro that generate synthetic question-answer (QA) pairs reflective of real-world legal reasoning. The strategy focuses particularly on developing datasets that enhance the legal reasoning capabilities of LLMs by providing diverse factual, definitional, and reasoning-based questions.
  2. Curriculum Learning: SynLexLM employs curriculum learning techniques that introduce data to the model in an increasing order of complexity, mimicking human learning processes. This progressive data exposure begins with simpler legal texts and moves to more complex documents, allowing the model to gradually adapt to intricate legal nuances.

Results

Preliminary experiments conducted by the authors indicate promising results. With a structured synthetic dataset derived from known sources like EurLex and EurLex-Sum, SynLexLM aims to achieve performance superior to traditional models on benchmarks such as BigLaw-Bench and LexGLUE. The paper reports a significant reduction in training losses when combining synthetic data and curriculum learning strategies, showing increments from 0.1918 to 0.0152 in EurLex and 0.1639 to 0.0026 in EurLex-Sum after employing the SynLexLM approach.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of SynLexLM are substantial for legal practice and beyond. The approach potentially enables:

  • Efficiency in Legal Practice: AI tools built on such models can optimize document analysis, research, and other labor-intensive legal tasks.
  • Accessibility: Smaller law firms and public legal entities could benefit from advanced legal AI systems without needing access to proprietary datasets.
  • Consistency and Accuracy: Automated legal analysis could lead to more consistent outcomes, minimizing human error.

The paper catalyzes further research into domain-specific AI applications. Success in legal applications may pave the way for similar advancements in fields like medicine and finance. Future explorations could expand data sources and refine synthetic generation techniques to further enhance model robustness and adaptability.

Conclusion

"SynLexLM: Scaling Legal LLMs with Synthetic Data and Curriculum Learning" presents a well-founded strategy to tackle the limitations hindering the development of specialized LLMs for law. Through the innovative combination of synthetic data generation and curriculum learning, SynLexLM demonstrates the potential to elevate domain-specific models to new heights, promising significant advancements in legal AI applications. As the paper outlines areas for further research and ethical considerations, it lays a comprehensive groundwork for continued exploration in the intersecting fields of artificial intelligence and law.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com