Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 92 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 98 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 209 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 466 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Presolve techniques for quasi-convex chance constraints with finite-support low-dimensional uncertainty (2504.05785v1)

Published 8 Apr 2025 in math.OC

Abstract: Chance-constrained programs (CCP) represent a trade-off between conservatism and robustness in optimization. In many CCPs, one optimizes an objective under a probabilistic constraint continuously parameterized by a random vector $\xi$. In this work, we study the specific case where the constraint is quasi-convex with $\xi$. Moreover, the support of vector $\xi$ is a collection of $N$ scenarios in dimension $p=2$ or $p=3$. In general, even when both the constraint and the objective are convex in the decision variable, the feasible region of a CCP is nonconvex, turning it into a difficult problem. However, under mild assumptions, many CCPs can be recast as big-$M$ mixed-integer convex programs (MICP). Unfortunately, the difficulty of these MICPs explodes with the number of scenarios, restricting the instances practically solvable in decent time. To cut down the effective number of scenarios considered in MICP reformulations and accelerate their solving, we propose and test presolve techniques based on computational geometry. Our techniques produce certificates to discard or select a priori some scenarios before solving a regular MICP. Moreover, the information aggregated during presolve leverages the possibility to strengthen big-$M$ constants. Our numerical experiments suggest that spending some time in presolve is more efficient than a direct solve for a class of probabilistic projection problems, including an interesting type of facility location problem.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube