Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 84 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 96 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 462 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 189 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Understanding Stellar Mass-Metallicity and Size Relations in Simulated Ultra-Faint Dwarf Galaxies (2411.14683v2)

Published 22 Nov 2024 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: Reproducing the physical characteristics of ultra-faint dwarf galaxies (UFDs) in cosmological simulations is challenging, particularly with respect to stellar metallicity and galaxy size. To investigate these difficulties in detail, we conduct high-resolution simulations ($M_{\rm gas} \sim 60 \, M_{\odot}$, $M_{\rm DM} \sim 370 \, M_{\odot}$ ) on six UFD analogs ($M_{\rm vir} \sim 108 - 109 \, M_{\odot}$, $M_{\rm \star} \sim 103 - 2.1 \times 104 \, M_{\odot}$). Our findings reveal that the stellar properties of UFD analogs are shaped by diverse star-forming environments from multiple progenitor halos in the early Universe. Notably, our UFD analogs exhibit a better match to the observed mass-metallicity relation (MZR), showing higher average metallicity compared to other theoretical models. The metallicity distribution functions (MDFs) of our simulated UFDs lack high-metallicity stars ($[\rm Fe/H] > -2.0$) while containing low-metallicity stars ($[\rm Fe/H] < -4.0$). Excluding these low-metallicity stars, our results align well with the MDFs of observed UFDs. However, forming stars with higher metallicity ($-2.0 \leq [\rm Fe/H]_{\rm max} \leq -1.5$) remains a challenge due to the difficulty of sustaining metal enrichment during their brief star formation period before cosmic reionization. Additionally, our simulations show extended outer structures in UFDs, resulting from dry mergers between progenitor halos. To ensure consistency, we adopt the same fitting method commonly used in observations to derive the half-light radius. We find that this method tends to produce lower values compared to direct calculations and struggles to accurately describe the extended outer structures. To address this, we employ a two-component density profile to obtain structural parameters, finding that it better describes the galaxy shape, including both inner and outer structures.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com