Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 94 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 42 tok/s
GPT-5 High 45 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 104 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 462 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 202 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Controllable Context Sensitivity and the Knob Behind It (2411.07404v4)

Published 11 Nov 2024 in cs.CL and cs.AI

Abstract: When making predictions, a LLM must trade off how much it relies on its context vs. its prior knowledge. Choosing how sensitive the model is to its context is a fundamental functionality, as it enables the model to excel at tasks like retrieval-augmented generation and question-answering. In this paper, we search for a knob which controls this sensitivity, determining whether LLMs answer from the context or their prior knowledge. To guide this search, we design a task for controllable context sensitivity. In this task, we first feed the model a context (Paris is in England) and a question (Where is Paris?); we then instruct the model to either use its prior or contextual knowledge and evaluate whether it generates the correct answer for both intents (either France or England). When fine-tuned on this task, instruction-tuned versions of Llama-3.1, Mistral-v0.3, and Gemma-2 can solve it with high accuracy (85-95%). Analyzing these high-performing models, we narrow down which layers may be important to context sensitivity using a novel linear time algorithm. Then, in each model, we identify a 1-D subspace in a single layer that encodes whether the model follows context or prior knowledge. Interestingly, while we identify this subspace in a fine-tuned model, we find that the exact same subspace serves as an effective knob in not only that model but also non-fine-tuned instruct and base models of that model family. Finally, we show a strong correlation between a model's performance and how distinctly it separates context-agreeing from context-ignoring answers in this subspace. These results suggest a single subspace facilitates how the model chooses between context and prior knowledge, hinting at a simple fundamental mechanism that controls this behavior.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

  • The paper introduces Controllable Context Sensitivity, a mechanism that instructs models to choose between context information and prior knowledge based on given instructions.
  • Methodology involves fine-tuning models like Llama-3.1 and Mistral-v0.3 on tasks with conflicting prompts, achieving 85-95% accuracy across various settings.
  • Insights reveal that a one-dimensional subspace within a model layer acts as a 'knob,' offering a practical approach to enhance model robustness in diverse applications.

Controllable Context Sensitivity and the Knob Behind It: An Expert Analysis

In the paper titled "Controllable Context Sensitivity and the Knob Behind It," the authors present a comprehensive paper into the modulation of context sensitivity in LLMs. The crux of their investigation is the development of a mechanism that allows LLMs to prioritize between context information and prior knowledge when generating responses, a crucial feature in applications ranging from misinformation resilience to context-dependent retrieval tasks.

Overview of the Study

The authors introduce the concept of Controllable Context Sensitivity (CCS), a mechanism that instructs a LLM to favor either context or prior knowledge when answering queries. This is operationalized through a task designed to differentiate correctly when to rely on each source of information. The task involves providing the model with intentionally conflicting prompts and evaluating its output based on the given instructions to prioritize context or prior knowledge.

Experimental Setup and Results

The focal point of their experimental evaluation involves fine-tuning several cutting-edge LLMs, such as Llama-3.1, Mistral-v0.3, and Gemma-2, on the CCS task. These models achieved high accuracy, ranging between 85-95%, illustrating their capacity to adapt to the new task through fine-tuning and few-shot learning. By contrasting the behavior of different models on both in-domain and out-of-domain contexts, the paper identifies a performance gradient that correlates with the models' intrinsic ability to discern which source of knowledge—context or prior—the models should rely on in ambiguous situations.

Furthermore, the authors present a novel algorithm to pinpoint the model layers instrumental in managing context sensitivity. Through mechanistic interpretability and activation-level interventions, they identify a one-dimensional subspace within a single model layer that acts as a "knob," dictating whether the model should prioritize context over prior knowledge or vice versa. Notably, this subspace exhibits cross-family utility, demonstrating effectiveness in both fine-tuned and base model settings.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

The research introduces a potential paradigm shift in how LLMs can dynamically adjust to varying information sources, crucial for enhancing model robustness in diverse real-world applications such as combating misinformation and ensuring accuracy in rapidly evolving knowledge domains. Moreover, by illustrating a strong correlation between task performance and the resolution of context and prior knowledge decisions within a specified subspace, the paper lays a theoretical foundation for the exploration of fundamental decision-making mechanisms within neural networks.

Future Directions

Building on these findings, future research is likely to explore understanding the extent to which these mechanisms can be generalized across different LLMs and domains. Further exploration might include a more granular investigation into the encoding of contextual relevance and prior knowledge, seeking to enhance model scalability and adaptability. Additionally, developing fine-tuning techniques and contextual steering methods that require less computational overhead could pave the way for more efficient model training and deployment in resource-constrained environments.

In conclusion, "Controllable Context Sensitivity and the Knob Behind It" contributes significantly to the understanding and manipulation of context sensitivity in LLMs. While their approach presents promising results in balancing context and prior knowledge reliance, ongoing research will be key in refining these techniques and broadening their applicability across various AI applications.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.