Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

$π_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control (2410.24164v1)

Published 31 Oct 2024 in cs.LG and cs.RO

Abstract: Robot learning holds tremendous promise to unlock the full potential of flexible, general, and dexterous robot systems, as well as to address some of the deepest questions in artificial intelligence. However, bringing robot learning to the level of generality required for effective real-world systems faces major obstacles in terms of data, generalization, and robustness. In this paper, we discuss how generalist robot policies (i.e., robot foundation models) can address these challenges, and how we can design effective generalist robot policies for complex and highly dexterous tasks. We propose a novel flow matching architecture built on top of a pre-trained vision-LLM (VLM) to inherit Internet-scale semantic knowledge. We then discuss how this model can be trained on a large and diverse dataset from multiple dexterous robot platforms, including single-arm robots, dual-arm robots, and mobile manipulators. We evaluate our model in terms of its ability to perform tasks in zero shot after pre-training, follow language instructions from people and from a high-level VLM policy, and its ability to acquire new skills via fine-tuning. Our results cover a wide variety of tasks, such as laundry folding, table cleaning, and assembling boxes.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (24)
  1. Kevin Black (29 papers)
  2. Noah Brown (10 papers)
  3. Danny Driess (35 papers)
  4. Adnan Esmail (2 papers)
  5. Michael Equi (5 papers)
  6. Chelsea Finn (264 papers)
  7. Niccolo Fusai (3 papers)
  8. Lachy Groom (3 papers)
  9. Karol Hausman (56 papers)
  10. Brian Ichter (52 papers)
  11. Szymon Jakubczak (3 papers)
  12. Tim Jones (8 papers)
  13. Liyiming Ke (13 papers)
  14. Sergey Levine (531 papers)
  15. Adrian Li-Bell (4 papers)
  16. Mohith Mothukuri (2 papers)
  17. Suraj Nair (39 papers)
  18. Karl Pertsch (35 papers)
  19. Lucy Xiaoyang Shi (8 papers)
  20. James Tanner (6 papers)
Citations (4)

Summary

  • The paper introduces π₀, a vision-language-action flow model built on pre-trained VLMs and flow matching for general and dexterous robot control.
  • π₀ utilizes a two-stage training process on diverse datasets, achieving robust zero-shot capabilities and improved performance after task-specific fine-tuning.
  • Key findings indicate π₀ enables high-frequency control (up to 50Hz) and demonstrates strong generalization across various robot platforms and complex manipulation tasks.

Motivation

The paper introduces a generalist robot policy framework designed to address longstanding challenges in robot learning—namely issues related to data scarcity, limited generalization, and reduced robustness during task execution. The authors leverage inspiration from recent advancements in vision-LLMs (VLMs) and large-scale pre-training approaches, proposing a robot foundation model that integrates semantic knowledge from Internet-scale data to robustly control various robot platforms performing high-dexterity tasks. The approach is motivated by the need to transition from task-specific controllers to a unified model capable of executing complex manipulation tasks in varying settings, as evidenced by the model's ability to perform tasks such as laundry folding, table cleaning, and assembling boxes without extensive task-specific retraining.

Methodology

Architectural Design

The proposed model, π₀, is architected as a vision-language-action (VLA) system that builds upon a pre-trained VLM (specifically, PaliGemma). Central to the architectural innovation is the incorporation of a flow matching component—a derivative of diffusion models—which allows the network to represent continuous high-dimensional action distributions with sufficient granularity to enable high-frequency control (up to 50 Hz). An important architectural nuance is the division of processing into specialized modules. An "action expert" module is deployed to specifically handle the transformation of high-fidelity state information into appropriate motor commands, thus decoupling perception from control.

Training Procedure

The training process for π₀ is bifurcated into two key stages:

  1. Pre-training: The model is trained on an extensive, heterogeneous dataset that amalgamates internally collected dexterous manipulation data across various robotic forms (single-arm, dual-arm, and mobile manipulators) with public datasets such as OXE, DROID, and Bridge v2. This scaling of the pre-training data is central to instilling broad semantic and motor capabilities into the model. The incorporation of pre-trained VLM components ensures that the model leverages transferable representational features learned from large-scale Internet data.
  2. Fine-tuning (Post-training): Post pre-training, the model undergoes fine-tuning on more narrowly curated and high-quality, task-specific datasets. This stage is critical for imbuing the model with the capability to execute complex, multi-stage tasks reliably. Techniques from high-level VLM policy guidance are also incorporated, where the model receives intermediate language commands that facilitate temporally extended planning and manipulation—essentially integrating high-level strategic reasoning with low-level real-time control.

Flow Matching in Action Representation

The adoption of flow matching within this context represents a significant technical contribution. By modeling the action distribution as a flow, the authors circumvent complications typical of direct diffusion modeling in continuous state spaces while preserving high-frequency reactivity and dexterity. This design choice directly contributes to the model's capability to perform precise and rapid motor adjustments required in dexterous tasks.

Experimental Evaluation

The experimental section rigorously evaluates π₀ across multiple benchmarks and task categories, emphasizing both zero-shot capabilities post pre-training and improved performance after task-specific fine-tuning. Key outcomes include:

  • Zero-Shot Performance:

The model exhibits substantial zero-shot performance on diverse tasks, indicating that the semantic and visuomotor representations acquired during pre-training are broadly transferable.

  • Task-Specific Fine-Tuning Improvements:

After fine-tuning, π₀ demonstrates marked improvements on complex dexterous tasks. For instance, tasks such as laundry folding and assembling boxes not only require precise local maneuvering but also high-level strategy—a combination that π₀ successfully handles via intermediate language instructions.

  • Quantitative Metrics:

The experiments underscore π₀'s performance advantage over baseline robot foundation models and state-of-the-art dexterous control methods. Although the exact numerical improvements are not detailed in the summary provided, the authors highlight that the two-stage training process (pre-training followed by fine-tuning) yields significant gains in task success rates across multiple challenging scenarios. The inclusion of high-frequency control (operating up to 50 Hz) is a non-trivial technical achievement that supports the model's deployment in real-world tasks requiring precise timing and control.

Key Conclusions

The comprehensive evaluation leads to several important conclusions:

  • Effectiveness of Pre-training and Fine-tuning:

The two-stage training process successfully amalgamates broad semantic knowledge and dexterous control strategies, yielding a model with robust zero-shot capabilities which are further enhanced by task-specific fine-tuning.

  • High-Frequency Control:

The successful integration of flow matching enables high-frequency control (up to 50 Hz), a critical requirement for real-time manipulation in dynamic environments. This aspect sets π₀ apart from many conventional models that often struggle to scale control frequencies.

  • Generalization Across Platforms:

The model's ability to integrate data from multiple robotic platforms and execute a diverse array of tasks demonstrates the viability of developing unified robot foundation models. This generalist approach contrasts sharply with traditional task-specific controllers, indicating a potential pathway towards more versatile and adaptive robotic systems.

In summary, π₀ offers a well-conceived integration of pre-trained vision-LLMs with advanced action representation techniques to produce a versatile and high-performing robot control policy. Its architectural and methodological innovations, particularly the use of flow matching and a robust two-stage training process, present a compelling approach to overcoming generalization and robustness issues in robot learning.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com