Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 52 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 55 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 216 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 468 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

CLEAR: Character Unlearning in Textual and Visual Modalities (2410.18057v4)

Published 23 Oct 2024 in cs.CV and cs.CL

Abstract: Machine Unlearning (MU) is critical for removing private or hazardous information from deep learning models. While MU has advanced significantly in unimodal (text or vision) settings, multimodal unlearning (MMU) remains underexplored due to the lack of open benchmarks for evaluating cross-modal data removal. To address this gap, we introduce CLEAR, the first open-source benchmark designed specifically for MMU. CLEAR contains 200 fictitious individuals and 3,700 images linked with corresponding question-answer pairs, enabling a thorough evaluation across modalities. We conduct a comprehensive analysis of 11 MU methods (e.g., SCRUB, gradient ascent, DPO) across four evaluation sets, demonstrating that jointly unlearning both modalities outperforms single-modality approaches. The dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/therem/CLEAR

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (56)
  1. Identifying and mitigating the security risks of generative ai. Foundations and Trends® in Privacy and Security, 6(1):1–52.
  2. The devil is in the details: Stylefeatureeditor for detail-rich stylegan inversion and high quality image editing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 9337–9346.
  3. Yinzhi Cao and Junfeng Yang. 2015. Towards making systems forget with machine unlearning. In 2015 IEEE symposium on security and privacy, pages 463–480. IEEE.
  4. Membership inference attacks from first principles. Preprint, arXiv:2112.03570.
  5. Cross-modal safety alignment: Is textual unlearning all you need? Preprint, arXiv:2406.02575.
  6. Jiaao Chen and Diyi Yang. 2023. Unlearn what you want to forget: Efficient unlearning for LLMs. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 12041–12052, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  7. Jiali Cheng and Hadi Amiri. 2023. Multidelete for multimodal machine unlearning.
  8. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. Preprint, arXiv:2010.11929.
  9. The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science, 9(3–4):211–407.
  10. Ronen Eldan and Mark Russinovich. 2023. Who’s harry potter? approximate unlearning in llms. Preprint, arXiv:2310.02238.
  11. Eternal sunshine of the spotless net: Selective forgetting in deep networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 9304–9312.
  12. Figstep: Jailbreaking large vision-language models via typographic visual prompts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.05608.
  13. Making the v in vqa matter: Elevating the role of image understanding in visual question answering. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 6904–6913.
  14. Inexact unlearning needs more careful evaluations to avoid a false sense of privacy. Preprint, arXiv:2403.01218.
  15. Deep residual learning for image recognition. Preprint, arXiv:1512.03385.
  16. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. Preprint, arXiv:2106.09685.
  17. Editing models with task arithmetic. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.04089.
  18. Knowledge unlearning for mitigating privacy risks in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.01504.
  19. Beavertails: Towards improved safety alignment of llm via a human-preference dataset. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36.
  20. Model sparsity can simplify machine unlearning. Preprint, arXiv:2304.04934.
  21. Mistral 7b. Preprint, arXiv:2310.06825.
  22. Analyzing and improving the image quality of stylegan. Preprint, arXiv:1912.04958.
  23. Towards unbounded machine unlearning. Preprint, arXiv:2302.09880.
  24. Towards unbounded machine unlearning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 36.
  25. Single image unlearning: Efficient machine unlearning in multimodal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12523.
  26. The wmdp benchmark: Measuring and reducing malicious use with unlearning. Preprint, arXiv:2403.03218.
  27. Photomaker: Customizing realistic human photos via stacked id embedding. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 8640–8650.
  28. Chin-Yew Lin. 2004. Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Text summarization branches out, pages 74–81.
  29. Truthfulqa: Measuring how models mimic human falsehoods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.07958.
  30. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part V 13, pages 740–755. Springer.
  31. Continual learning and private unlearning. Preprint, arXiv:2203.12817.
  32. Visual instruction tuning.
  33. Quark: Controllable text generation with reinforced unlearning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:27591–27609.
  34. Jailbreakv-28k: A benchmark for assessing the robustness of multimodal large language models against jailbreak attacks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.03027.
  35. Tofu: A task of fictitious unlearning for llms.
  36. Descent-to-delete: Gradient-based methods for machine unlearning. In Algorithmic Learning Theory, pages 931–962. PMLR.
  37. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pages 8748–8763. PMLR.
  38. Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model. Preprint, arXiv:2305.18290.
  39. Remember what you want to forget: Algorithms for machine unlearning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:18075–18086.
  40. Jailbreak in pieces: Compositional adversarial attacks on multi-modal language models. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations.
  41. Interpreting the latent space of gans for semantic face editing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 9243–9252.
  42. Muse: Machine unlearning six-way evaluation for language models. Preprint, arXiv:2407.06460.
  43. Membership inference attacks against machine learning models. In 2017 IEEE symposium on security and privacy (SP), pages 3–18. IEEE.
  44. Fast yet effective machine unlearning.
  45. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. Preprint, arXiv:2307.09288.
  46. Depn: Detecting and editing privacy neurons in pretrained language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.20138.
  47. Stylespace analysis: Disentangled controls for stylegan image generation. 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 12858–12867.
  48. x.ai. 2024. Grok-1.5 vision preview.
  49. Efuf: Efficient fine-grained unlearning framework for mitigating hallucinations in multimodal large language models. ArXiv, abs/2402.09801.
  50. Machine unlearning of pre-trained large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.15159.
  51. Large language model unlearning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10683.
  52. Large language model unlearning. Preprint, arXiv:2310.10683.
  53. Unlearning bias in language models by partitioning gradients. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 6032–6048.
  54. Composing parameter-efficient modules with arithmetic operations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.14870.
  55. Negative preference optimization: From catastrophic collapse to effective unlearning. Preprint, arXiv:2404.05868.
  56. Global-local gcn: Large-scale label noise cleansing for face recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7731–7740.
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Summary

  • The paper introduces the CLEAR benchmark, a controlled dataset for evaluating machine unlearning in both text and visual modalities.
  • It adapts and assesses ten existing unlearning methods to address the unique challenges posed by multimodal data in large models.
  • Regularization on LoRA weights is used to reduce catastrophic forgetting while maintaining overall model performance.

Overview of CLEAR: Character Unlearning in Textual and Visual Modalities

The paper "CLEAR: Character Unlearning in Textual and Visual Modalities" introduces a novel benchmark aimed at evaluating methods for Machine Unlearning (MU) in the context of multimodal models, specifically focusing on textual and visual data. Recognizing the critical necessity for MU in enhancing privacy and security within deep learning architectures, particularly in Large Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs), the paper makes significant contributions toward addressing the challenges of unlearning across different data modalities.

Key Contributions and Findings

  1. Benchmark Creation: The authors present CLEAR, a synthetic dataset developed to evaluate unlearning methods. It comprises data related to 200 fictitious individuals including 3,700 images and their corresponding question-answer pairs. The dataset is carefully crafted to prevent information leakage and ensure a controlled environment for assessing unlearning techniques. This structured dataset facilitates a thorough analysis of unlearning methodologies in both single and multimodal contexts.
  2. Evaluation of MU Methods: Ten existing MU methods were adapted for multimodal unlearning (MMU) and evaluated using the CLEAR benchmark. The paper highlights several challenges that are unique to multimodal unlearning, emphasizing that strategies effective in unimodal contexts do not directly translate to multimodal scenarios.
  3. Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting: The paper reports that the application of a simple ℓ1\ell_1 regularization technique on the LoRA weights substantially reduces the phenomenon of catastrophic forgetting, thereby preserving the MLLM's performance on the retained data set. This finding underscores the potential of regularization techniques in improving the robustness of unlearning processes in complex, multimodal models.

Practical and Theoretical Implications

The work has significant practical implications. The ability to selectively "unlearn" information without re-training models from scratch is crucial for compliance with privacy regulations, such as GDPR’s "right to be forgotten". It provides a pathway for organizations to modify or retract aspects of trained models post-deployment, addressing privacy and bias concerns in AI applications.

From a theoretical standpoint, the paper furthers our understanding of MMU challenges. It opens avenues for future research into more sophisticated unlearning techniques capable of spanning multiple data modalities. Additionally, the paper's insights into regularization techniques can inform the design of robust algorithms that effectively balance the trade-off between forgetting specific data and maintaining overall model integrity.

Future Directions

Given the foundational nature of this work, a number of avenues for future research can be identified:

  • Advanced MU Techniques: Development of novel MU algorithms tailored specifically to the unique requirements of multimodal models. This includes unlearning algorithms that can efficiently handle the interaction between textual and visual features.
  • Broader Evaluation Metrics: While the paper proposes several evaluation metrics, further refinement and development of these metrics could provide more comprehensive assessments of unlearning efficacy.
  • Scalability and Efficiency: Investigating methods that not only perform effective unlearning but also maintain computational efficiency, especially relevant for large-scale MLLMs.
  • Integration with Real-world Privacy Regulations: Applying the proposed unlearning frameworks in real-world scenarios to assess their compliance with legal privacy frameworks and their operational practicality.

The introduction of the CLEAR benchmark represents a significant step toward advancing MU research. By providing a standardized platform for evaluating MMU techniques, this work encourages ongoing improvements in the domain of AI privacy and data management.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown
Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now