Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 97 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 92 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 468 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 175 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Performance-Aware Self-Configurable Multi-Agent Networks: A Distributed Submodular Approach for Simultaneous Coordination and Network Design (2409.01411v1)

Published 2 Sep 2024 in eess.SY, cs.AI, cs.MA, cs.RO, cs.SY, and math.OC

Abstract: We introduce the first, to our knowledge, rigorous approach that enables multi-agent networks to self-configure their communication topology to balance the trade-off between scalability and optimality during multi-agent planning. We are motivated by the future of ubiquitous collaborative autonomy where numerous distributed agents will be coordinating via agent-to-agent communication to execute complex tasks such as traffic monitoring, event detection, and environmental exploration. But the explosion of information in such large-scale networks currently curtails their deployment due to impractical decision times induced by the computational and communication requirements of the existing near-optimal coordination algorithms. To overcome this challenge, we present the AlterNAting COordination and Network-Design Algorithm (Anaconda), a scalable algorithm that also enjoys near-optimality guarantees. Subject to the agents' bandwidth constraints, Anaconda enables the agents to optimize their local communication neighborhoods such that the action-coordination approximation performance of the network is maximized. Compared to the state of the art, Anaconda is an anytime self-configurable algorithm that quantifies its suboptimality guarantee for any type of network, from fully disconnected to fully centralized, and that, for sparse networks, is one order faster in terms of decision speed. To develop the algorithm, we quantify the suboptimality cost due to decentralization, i.e., due to communication-minimal distributed coordination. We also employ tools inspired by the literature on multi-armed bandits and submodular maximization subject to cardinality constraints. We demonstrate Anaconda in simulated scenarios of area monitoring and compare it with a state-of-the-art algorithm.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. Z. Xu, X. Lin, and V. Tzoumas, “Bandit submodular maximization for multi-robot coordination in unpredictable and partially observable environments,” in Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), 2023.
  2. N. Atanasov, J. Le Ny, K. Daniilidis, and G. J. Pappas, “Decentralized active information acquisition: Theory and application to multi-robot SLAM,” in IEEE Inter. Conf. Rob. Auto. (ICRA), 2015, pp. 4775–4782.
  3. M. Corah and N. Michael, “Distributed submodular maximization on partition matroids for planning on large sensor networks,” in IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2018, pp. 6792–6799.
  4. A. Krause, A. Singh, and C. Guestrin, “Near-optimal sensor placements in gaussian processes: Theory, efficient algorithms and empirical studies,” Jour. Mach. Learn. Res. (JMLR), vol. 9, pp. 235–284, 2008.
  5. A. Singh, A. Krause, C. Guestrin, and W. J. Kaiser, “Efficient informative sensing using multiple robots,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR), vol. 34, pp. 707–755, 2009.
  6. P. Tokekar, V. Isler, and A. Franchi, “Multi-target visual tracking with aerial robots,” in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2014, pp. 3067–3072.
  7. B. Gharesifard and S. L. Smith, “Distributed submodular maximization with limited information,” IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems (TCNS), vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1635–1645, 2017.
  8. J. R. Marden, “The role of information in distributed resource allocation,” IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems (TCNS), vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 654–664, 2017.
  9. D. Grimsman, M. S. Ali, J. P. Hespanha, and J. R. Marden, “The impact of information in distributed submodular maximization,” IEEE Trans. Ctrl. Netw. Sys. (TCNS), vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1334–1343, 2019.
  10. B. Schlotfeldt, V. Tzoumas, and G. J. Pappas, “Resilient active information acquisition with teams of robots,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics (TRO), vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 244–261, 2021.
  11. Z. Xu and V. Tzoumas, “Resource-aware distributed submodular maximization: A paradigm for multi-robot decision-making,” in IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2022, pp. 5959–5966.
  12. B. Du, K. Qian, C. Claudel, and D. Sun, “Jacobi-style iteration for distributed submodular maximization,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control (TAC), vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 4687–4702, 2022.
  13. N. Rezazadeh and S. S. Kia, “Distributed strategy selection: A submodular set function maximization approach,” Automatica, vol. 153, p. 111000, 2023.
  14. A. Robey, A. Adibi, B. Schlotfeldt, H. Hassani, and G. J. Pappas, “Optimal algorithms for submodular maximization with distributed constraints,” in Learn. for Dyn. & Cont. (L4DC), 2021, pp. 150–162.
  15. M. L. Fisher, G. L. Nemhauser, and L. A. Wolsey, “An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions–II,” in Polyhedral combinatorics, 1978, pp. 73–87.
  16. U. Feige, “A threshold of l⁢n⁢(n)𝑙𝑛𝑛ln(n)italic_l italic_n ( italic_n ) for approximating set cover,” Journal of the ACM (JACM), vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 634–652, 1998.
  17. Q. Wu, J. Xu, Y. Zeng, D. W. K. Ng, N. Al-Dhahir, R. Schober, and A. L. Swindlehurst, “A comprehensive overview on 5G-and-beyond networks with UAVs: From communications to sensing and intelligence,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 2912–2945, 2021.
  18. G. Calinescu, C. Chekuri, M. Pál, and J. Vondrák, “Maximizing a monotone submodular function subject to a matroid constraint,” SIAM Journal on Computing, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1740–1766, 2011.
  19. R. Konda, D. Grimsman, and J. R. Marden, “Execution order matters in greedy algorithms with limited information,” in American Control Conference (ACC), 2022, pp. 1305–1310.
  20. Y.-C. Liu, J. Tian, C.-Y. Ma, N. Glaser, C.-W. Kuo, and Z. Kira, “Who2com: Collaborative perception via learnable handshake communication,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2020, pp. 6876–6883.
  21. Y. Niu, R. Paleja, and M. Gombolay, “Multi-agent graph-attention communication and teaming,” in International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, 2021, pp. 964–973.
  22. Y. Crama, P. L. Hammer, and R. Holzman, “A characterization of a cone of pseudo-boolean functions via supermodularity-type inequalities,” in Quantitative Methoden in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften.   Springer, 1989, pp. 53–55.
  23. S. Foldes and P. L. Hammer, “Submodularity, supermodularity, and higher-order monotonicities of pseudo-boolean functions,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 453–461, 2005.
  24. O. S. Oubbati, M. Atiquzzaman, P. Lorenz, M. H. Tareque, and M. S. Hossain, “Routing in flying ad hoc networks: Survey, constraints, and future challenge perspectives,” IEEE Access, pp. 81 057–81 105, 2019.
  25. M. Conforti and G. Cornuéjols, “Submodular set functions, matroids and the greedy algorithm: Tight worst-case bounds and some generalizations of the rado-edmonds theorem,” Discrete Applied Mathematics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 251–274, 1984.
  26. R. Iyer, N. Khargonkar, J. Bilmes, and H. Asnani, “Generalized submodular information measures: Theoretical properties, examples, optimization algorithms, and applications,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2021.
  27. M. Zhang, L. Chen, H. Hassani, and A. Karbasi, “Online continuous submodular maximization: From full-information to bandit feedback,” Adv. Neu. Info. Proc. Sys. (NeurIPS), vol. 32, 2019.
  28. T. Matsuoka, S. Ito, and N. Ohsaka, “Tracking regret bounds for online submodular optimization,” in International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS).   PMLR, 2021, pp. 3421–3429.
  29. G. Neu, “Explore no more: Improved high-probability regret bounds for non-stochastic bandits,” Adv. Neu. Info. Proc. Sys., vol. 28, 2015.
  30. M. Sviridenko, J. Vondrák, and J. Ward, “Optimal approximation for submodular and supermodular optimization with bounded curvature,” Math. of Operations Research, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1197–1218, 2017.
  31. R. K. Iyer, S. Jegelka, and J. A. Bilmes, “Curvature and optimal algorithms for learning and minimizing submodular functions,” in Advances in Neural Inform. Processing Systems, 2013, pp. 2742–2750.
  32. V. Tzoumas, K. Gatsis, A. Jadbabaie, and G. J. Pappas, “Resilient monotone submodular function maximization,” in IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2017, pp. 1362–1367.
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com