Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 72 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 57 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 43 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 219 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Leptonic dipole operator with $Γ_2$ modular invariance in light of Muon $(g-2)_μ$ (2408.05742v2)

Published 11 Aug 2024 in hep-ph and hep-ex

Abstract: We have studied the leptonic EDM and the LFV decays relating with the recent data of anomalous magnetic moment of muon, $(g-2){\mu}$ in the leptonic dipole operator. We have adopted the successful $\Gamma_2$ modular invariant model by Meloni-Parriciatu as the flavor symmetry of leptons. Suppose the anomaly of $(g-2){\mu}$, $\Delta a_{\mu}$ to be evidence of New Physics (NP), we have related it with the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron $\Delta a_e$, the electron EDM $d_e$ and the $\mu\to e \gamma$ decay. We found that the NP contributions to $\Delta a_{e(\mu)}$ are proportional to the lepton masses squared likewise the naive scaling $\Delta a_\ell \propto m2_\ell$. The experimental constraint of $|d_e|$ is much tight compared with the one from the branching ratio $\mathcal{B} (\mu \to e \gamma)$ in our framework. Supposing the phase of our model parameter $\delta_{\alpha}$ for the electron to be of order one, we have estimated the upper-bound of $\mathcal{B}(\mu \to e \gamma)$, which is at most $10{-21}-10{-20}$. If some model parameters are real, leptonic EDMs vanish since the CP phase of the modular form due to modulus $\tau$ does not contribute to the EDM. However, we can obtain $\mathcal{B} (\mu \to e \gamma)\simeq 10{-13}$ with non-vanishing $d_e$ in a specific case. The imaginary part of a parameter can lead to $d_e$ in the next-to-leading contribution. The predicted electron EDM is below $10{-32}$e\,cm, while $\mathcal{B} (\mu \to e \gamma)$ is close to the experimental upper-bound. The branching ratios of $\tau\to e\gamma$ and $\tau\to \mu\gamma$ are also discussed.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.