Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Open-Source Assessments of AI Capabilities: The Proliferation of AI Analysis Tools, Replicating Competitor Models, and the Zhousidun Dataset (2405.12167v3)

Published 20 May 2024 in cs.CY

Abstract: The integration of AI into military capabilities has become a norm for major military power across the globe. Understanding how these AI models operate is essential for maintaining strategic advantages and ensuring security. This paper demonstrates an open-source methodology for analyzing military AI models through a detailed examination of the Zhousidun dataset, a Chinese-originated dataset that exhaustively labels critical components on American and Allied destroyers. By demonstrating the replication of a state-of-the-art computer vision model on this dataset, we illustrate how open-source tools can be leveraged to assess and understand key military AI capabilities. This methodology offers a robust framework for evaluating the performance and potential of AI-enabled military capabilities, thus enhancing the accuracy and reliability of strategic assessments.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (89)
  1. Airbus Ship Detection Challenge. https://kaggle.com/competitions/airbus-ship-detection.
  2. Ships in Satellite Imagery. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/rhammell/ships-in-satellite-imagery.
  3. Chinese Public AI R&D Spending: Provisional Findings. Technical report, Center for Security and Emerging Technologies, December 2019.
  4. AIS Data Aided Rayleigh CFAR Ship Detection Algorithm of Multiple-Target Environment in SAR Images. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 58(2):1266–1282, April 2022.
  5. Multi-Scale Rotation-Invariant Haar-Like Feature Integrated CNN-Based Ship Detection Algorithm of Multiple-Target Environment in SAR Imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(12):10070–10087, December 2019.
  6. Object-based image analysis approach for vessel detection on optical and radar image. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 13(1), January 2019.
  7. Deep Learning-Based Ship Detection in Remote Sensing Imagery Using TensorFlow. Advances in Machine Learning and Computational Intelligence, July 2020.
  8. Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate. CoRR, September 2014.
  9. Design and Evaluation of a Artificial Intelligence Based Vessel Detection System in Pol-SAR Images. 12th European Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar, pages 1–5, 2018.
  10. Vessel Detection using Image Processing and Neural Networks. 2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, pages 2276–2279, 2020.
  11. A Deep-Learning-Based Lightweight Model for Ship Localizations in SAR Images. IEEE Access, 11:94415–94427, 2023.
  12. A comparison of fixed threshold CFAR and CNN ship detection methods for S-band NovaSAR images. Small Satellite Conference, August 2020.
  13. Ship detection based on YOLOv2 for SAR imagery. Remote Sensing, 11(7):786, January 2019.
  14. FGSD: A Dataset for Fine-Grained Ship Detection in High Resolution Satellite Images, March 2020.
  15. Webly Supervised Learning of Convolutional Networks. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 1431–1439, Santiago, Chile, December 2015. IEEE.
  16. Deep learning for autonomous ship-oriented small ship detection. Safety Science, 130:104812, October 2020.
  17. Ship Detection in Sentinel 2 Multi-Spectral Images with Self-Supervised Learning. Remote Sensing, 13(21):4255, January 2021.
  18. Commander, U.S. 7th Fleet Public Affairs. U.S. Navy Destroyer Conducts Freedom of Navigation Operation in the South China Sea. https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/Article/3771407/us-navy-destroyer-conducts-freedom-of-navigation-operation-in-the-south-china-s/, May 2024.
  19. A complete processing chain for ship detection using optical satellite imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 31(22):5837–5854, December 2010.
  20. New Approaches and Tools for Ship Detection in Optical Satellite Imagery. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1642(1):012003, September 2020.
  21. NovaSAR and SSTL s1-4: SAR and EO data fusion. Small Satellite Conference, August 2020.
  22. Satellite Image Classification via Two-Layer Sparse Coding With Biased Image Representation. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 8(1):173–176, January 2011.
  23. SAR-SHIPNET: SAR-SHIP DETECTION NEURAL NETWORK VIA BIDIRECTIONAL COORDINATE ATTENTION AND MULTI-RESOLUTION FEATURE FUSION. March 2022.
  24. A Public Dataset for Fine-Grained Ship Classification in Optical Remote Sensing Images. Remote Sensing, 13(4):747, January 2021.
  25. Object detection in aerial images: A large-scale benchmark and challenges. arXiv:2102.12219 [cs], February 2021.
  26. An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale, June 2021.
  27. SISP: A Benchmark Dataset for Fine-grained Ship Instance Segmentation in Panchromatic Satellite Images. February 2024.
  28. Ulrike Franke. Not smart enough: The poverty of European military thinking on artificial intelligence. \usepackage{url} \def\UrlBreaks{\do\/\do-} \usepackage{breakurl} \usepackage[breaklinks]{hyperref}, December 2019.
  29. Automatic Ship Classification from Optical Aerial Images with Convolutional Neural Networks. Remote Sensing, 10(4):511, April 2018.
  30. Counting from Sky: A Large-scale Dataset for Remote Sensing Object Counting and A Benchmark Method. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, August 2020.
  31. NWPU-MOC: A Benchmark for Fine-grained Multi-category Object Counting in Aerial Images. Journal of Latex Class Files, 14(8), August 2021.
  32. Leonardo Gubello. Image processing with traditional and artificial intelligence techniques for ship detection. December 2022.
  33. xT: Nested Tokenization for Larger Context in Large Images, March 2024.
  34. FUSAR-Ship: Building a high-resolution SAR-AIS matchup dataset of Gaofen-3 for ship detection and recognition. Science China Information Sciences, 63(4):140303, March 2020.
  35. A Dual-Polarimetric SAR Ship Detection Dataset and a Memory-Augmented Autoencoder-Based Detection Method. Sensors, 21(24):8478, January 2021.
  36. ABOShips – An Inshore and Offshore Maritime Vessel Detection Dataset with Precise Annotations, February 2021.
  37. Towards an Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach for Ships Detection from Satellite Imagery. International Conference on Applied Intelligence and Informatics, June 2023.
  38. Ship Detection in SAR Images with Human-in-the-Loop.
  39. VHRShips: An Extensive Benchmark Dataset for Scalable Deep Learning-Based Ship Detection Applications. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11(8):445, August 2022.
  40. xView: Objects in context in overhead imagery. arXiv:1802.07856 [cs], February 2018.
  41. James M. Landreth. Through DoD’s Valley of Death: A Data-Intensive Startup’s Journey. Defense Acquisition Magazine, (Jan-Feb 2022), February 2022.
  42. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(11):2278–2324, November 1998.
  43. Accurate Ship Detection Using Electro-Optical Image-Based Satellite on Enhanced Feature and Land Awareness. Sensors, 22(23):9491, January 2022.
  44. SRSDD-v1.0: A High-Resolution SAR Rotation Ship Detection Dataset. Remote Sensing, 13(24):5104, January 2021.
  45. OpenSARShip 2.0: A large-volume dataset for deeper interpretation of ship targets in Sentinel-1 imagery. In 2017 SAR in Big Data Era: Models, Methods and Applications (BIGSARDATA), pages 1–5, November 2017.
  46. Ship detection in SAR images based on an improved faster R-CNN. In 2017 SAR in Big Data Era: Models, Methods and Applications (BIGSARDATA), pages 1–6, November 2017.
  47. Object detection in optical remote sensing images: A survey and a new benchmark. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 159:296–307, January 2020.
  48. Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context. In David Fleet, Tomas Pajdla, Bernt Schiele, and Tinne Tuytelaars, editors, Computer Vision – ECCV 2014, pages 740–755, Cham, 2014. Springer International Publishing.
  49. Rotated region based CNN for ship detection. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pages 900–904, September 2017.
  50. A High Resolution Optical Satellite Image Dataset for Ship Recognition and Some New Baselines:. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods, pages 324–331, Porto, Portugal, 2017. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications.
  51. AMANet: Advancing SAR Ship Detection with Adaptive Multi-Hierarchical Attention Network. IEEE Access, 11, 2023.
  52. Ship detection with spectral analysis of synthetic aperture radar: A comparison of new and well-known algorithms. Remote Sensing, 7(5):5416–5439, May 2015.
  53. Automatic fusion of satellite imagery and AIS data for vessel detection. In 2019 22th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION), pages 1–5, July 2019.
  54. Deep Convolutional Neural Network based Ship Images Classification. Defence Science Journal, 71(2):200–208, March 2021.
  55. xView3-SAR: Detecting Dark Fishing Activity Using Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery. NeurIPS Proceedings, 2022.
  56. Deep Learning-Based Automatic Detection of Ships: An Experimental Study Using Satellite Images. J. Imaging, 8(7), June 2022.
  57. Large-scale automatic vessel monitoring based on dual-polarization sentinel-1 and AIS data. Remote Sensing, 11(9):1078, January 2019.
  58. MLRSNet: A multi-label high spatial resolution remote sensing dataset for semantic scene understanding. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 169:337–350, November 2020.
  59. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson, 4 edition, 2021.
  60. Enhancing Performance of IR Ship Detection with Baseline AI Models over a new Benchmark. IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering, pages 1–6, 2021.
  61. Operationalizing Machine Learning: An Interview Study. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.09125v1, September 2022.
  62. SeaShips: A large-scale precisely annotated dataset for ship detection. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 20(10):2593–2604, October 2018.
  63. Tom Shugart. Deterring the Powerful Enemy. https://www.cnas.org/publications/congressional-testimony/deterring-the-powerful-enemy, March 2024.
  64. Compressed-domain ship detection on spaceborne optical image using deep neural network and extreme learning machine. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(3):1174–1185, March 2015.
  65. The digital frontiers of fisheries governance: Fish attraction devices, drones and satellites. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(1):125–137, January 2020.
  66. U.S. 7th Fleet Public Affairs. U.S., Japan Conduct Bilateral Exercise in the South China Sea. https://www.cpf.navy.mil/Newsroom/News/Article/3679868/us-japan-conduct-bilateral-exercise-in-the-south-china-sea/, February 2024.
  67. Ship Detection for High-Resolution SAR Images Based on Feature Analysis. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 11(1):119–123, January 2014.
  68. SAR Ship Target Recognition Via Multi-Scale Feature Attention and Adaptive-Weighed Classifier. August 2023.
  69. A SAR dataset of ship detection for deep learning under complex backgrounds. Remote Sensing, 11(7):765, January 2019.
  70. SAR-AIRcraft-1.0: High-resolution SAR Aircraft Detection and Recognition Dataset. Journal of Radars, 12(4), August 2023.
  71. HRSID: A High-Resolution SAR Images Dataset for Ship Detection and Instance Segmentation. IEEE Access, 8:120234–120254, 2020.
  72. Automating offshore infrastructure extractions using synthetic aperture radar & google earth engine. Remote Sensing of Environment, 233:111412, November 2019.
  73. LR-TSDet: Towards Tiny Ship Detection in Low-Resolution Remote Sensing Images. Remote Sensing, 13(19):3890, January 2021.
  74. DOTA: A large-scale dataset for object detection in aerial images. In 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3974–3983, Salt Lake City, UT, June 2018. IEEE.
  75. AID: A Benchmark Data Set for Performance Evaluation of Aerial Scene Classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(7):3965–3981, July 2017.
  76. AIR-SARShip-1.0: High-resolution SAR Ship Detection Dataset (in English). Journal of Radars, 8(6):852–863, December 2019.
  77. Satellite Image Recognition for Smart Ships Using A Convolutional Neural Networks Algorithm. International Journal of Decision Science, 10(2):85–91, June 2019.
  78. Ship detection from optical satellite images based on sea surface analysis. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 11(3):641–645, March 2014.
  79. Research on Mosaic Image Data Enhancement for Overlapping Ship Targets. May 2021.
  80. A Novel Full-Polarization SAR Images Ship Detector Based on the Scattering Mechanisms and the Wave Polarization Anisotropy. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, December 2021.
  81. Arbitrary-Oriented Ship Detection through Center-Head Point Extraction. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, October 2021.
  82. LS-SSDD-v1.0: A deep learning dataset dedicated to small ship detection from large-scale sentinel-1 SAR images. Remote Sensing, 12(18):2997, January 2020.
  83. SAR Ship Detection Dataset (SSDD): Official Release and Comprehensive Data Analysis. Remote Sensing, 13(18):3690, January 2021.
  84. Hierarchical and robust convolutional neural network for very high-resolution remote sensing object detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(8):5535–5548, August 2019.
  85. Toward arbitrary-oriented ship detection with rotated region proposal and discrimination networks. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 15(11):1745–1749, November 2018.
  86. ShipRSImageNet: A Large-Scale Fine-Grained Dataset for Ship Detection in High-Resolution Optical Remote Sensing Images. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 14:8458–8472, 2021.
  87. CVGG-Net: Ship Recognition for SAR Images Based on Complex-Valued Convolutional Neural Network.
  88. Objects as Points. arXiv:1904.07850 [cs], April 2019.
  89. A novel hierarchical method of ship detection from spaceborne optical image based on shape and texture features. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48(9):3446–3456, September 2010.
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper introduces an open-source methodology that replicates AI models using the Zhousidun dataset, achieving a 0.926 mAP on curated images while revealing performance drops with synthetic data.
  • The study emphasizes the crucial role of high-quality, domain-specific data, as illustrated by the 608 naval images that underpin targeted AI model performance.
  • The research highlights the democratization of AI development through publicly available tools, bridging gaps between academic research and military application.

Open-Source Assessments of AI Capabilities

Introduction

This paper introduces an open-source methodology for analyzing military AI models, specifically through the lens of the Zhousidun dataset. The research showcases how publicly available tools can replicate and assess the performance of AI models targeted at identifying critical components in naval vessels. Let’s dive into some of the interesting takeaways from this paper.

The Zhousidun Dataset

The focal point of the paper is the Zhousidun dataset, which consists of 608 images of American and Allied destroyers. These images include ground-based and satellite photos, with specific components like radar systems marked with bounding boxes. Interestingly, this dataset seems to have been unintentionally released online, providing researchers with a unique opportunity to evaluate AI capabilities in the military context. Here's a summary of its characteristics:

  • Origin: Likely from ShanghaiTech University through the Roboflow platform, directly or indirectly.
  • Content: Imagery focuses on critical components of destroyers, particularly the SPY radars and VLS missile-launching systems.
  • Sources: Both ground-oblique optical sensors and optical satellite imagery, some with visible watermarks from Google Earth and media outlets.

Proliferation and Lifecycle of AI Tools

Historically, military technology was developed in isolation and kept secret, but AI research has democratized this process. State-of-the-art AI methods, including code and data, are frequently published and widely available, making model replication comparatively easy. This democratization means that understanding and replicating competitor models is more feasible than ever, but it highlights the importance of data quality and collection methods.

Key Points:

  • Data as a Differentiator: The advantage is increasingly centered around the unique datasets used to train models.
  • Publicly Available Tools: Tools like Meta’s Detectron2 and the Ultralytics library are accessible, widely used, and provide a robust starting point for AI model development.
  • Simulation and Synthetic Data: Advances in simulation allow for effective testing and bootstrapping even when real-world data is scarce or unavailable.

Replicating Models on Zhousidun

The researchers utilized the YOLOv8 model to detect components within the Zhousidun images and validated their model with synthetic data. Here's a brief overview of what they found:

  • Initial Results: On the Zhousidun test set, the YOLOv8 model achieved a mean average precision (mAP) score of 0.926, indicating strong performance within the original dataset.
  • Synthetic Data Validation: When tested on synthetic images representing real-world scenarios, the model's performance dropped significantly, showing an mAP of 0.411 overall. The performance was notably lower for satellite-geometry images.

These results imply that while models can perform well on curated datasets, their real-world applicability can be limited due to differences in image quality and data sources.

Practical Implications and Theoretical Insights

The research suggests several important implications:

  • Model Training and Data Quality: The paper underscores that high-quality, targeted data is crucial for building effective AI models for military applications.
  • Use Cases for Zhousidun: Models trained on datasets like Zhousidun could help identify and potentially target specific components of naval vessels, although their out-of-distribution performance needs improvement.
  • Bridging Military and Academic AI: The differentiation in capabilities between sectors highlights the necessity of a strong pipeline from academic research to operational military AI solutions.

Future Developments

Here are some speculative future directions based on the findings:

  • Enhanced Data Collection: Greater emphasis on acquiring high-quality, representative data for training models, possibly through autonomous uncrewed systems or sophisticated satellite systems.
  • Integration of Advanced Models: Continued development and integration of vision transformers and other advanced architectures could enhance detection capabilities.
  • Dual-Use Technologies: Techniques developed for civilian purposes, like environmental monitoring, will likely see increased adaptation for military applications.

Conclusion

The paper illustrates the significant potential of open-source methodologies for military AI assessment. While the current models show promising initial results, the key takeaway is the critical importance of quality data and the need to bridge gaps between datasets and real-world applicability. This work provides a foundation for ongoing assessments and improvements in AI capabilities for strategic and security purposes.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com