A note on continuous-time online learning
(2405.10399v1)
Published 16 May 2024 in stat.ML, cs.LG, cs.NA, math.NA, and math.OC
Abstract: In online learning, the data is provided in a sequential order, and the goal of the learner is to make online decisions to minimize overall regrets. This note is concerned with continuous-time models and algorithms for several online learning problems: online linear optimization, adversarial bandit, and adversarial linear bandit. For each problem, we extend the discrete-time algorithm to the continuous-time setting and provide a concise proof of the optimal regret bound.
In the world of online learning, we often come across dynamic scenarios where decisions need to be made in sequence to minimize regrets. Traditionally, most of the research has been focused on discrete-time settings. However, this paper by Lexing Ying introduces continuous-time models and algorithms for some key online learning problems - namely, online linear optimization, adversarial bandits, and adversarial linear bandits. Let's dive into the details and see what's cooking in the continuous-time space.
Key Results with Legendre Transform
Before jumping into the nitty-gritty of online learning scenarios, the paper introduces the Legendre transform as a crucial tool. For those not so familiar, the Legendre transform is a mathematical operation that can provide a one-to-one correspondence between certain convex functions and their duals.
To break things down:
Convex function F(x): This is defined on a convex set X.
Legendre transform G(y): This transform essentially swaps the domain and enables optimization on a different variable.
This transformation helps in simplifying many of the proofs and algorithms in continuous-time settings.
Online Linear Optimization
Discrete-Time Scenario
In traditional online linear optimization, the process is pretty straightforward:
The learner picks a strategy xt∈X.
The adversary provides a reward vector rt.
The learner then updates the strategy based on the rewards collected.
The goal here is to minimize regret, which measures how much worse the learner's total reward is compared to the best possible fixed strategy in hindsight.
Continuous-Time Jump
The continuous-time algorithm follows similar steps but with an elegant twist:
Use cumulative rewards and update strategies in real-time.
The learner's action x(t) is derived using a continuous-time extension of the follow-the-regularized-leader algorithm.
A fascinating result here is that the regret can be bounded by β−1lnd for any β>0. Interestingly, by tweaking β, the continuous-time regret approaches zero, suggesting that following the leader is optimal in this scenario, unlike the discrete-time case.
Adversarial Bandits
Discrete-Time Scenario
With adversarial bandits, the learner picks an arm (or strategy) in each round and gets a reward associated with that arm. The catch is that the learner doesn't see the rewards of other arms. This setup involves:
Calculating the probability distribution for choosing an arm.
Using estimated rewards to update this probability distribution.
The key here is to use strategies that can balance exploration and exploitation to minimize regret.
Continuous-Time Jump
In the continuous-time setup:
Cumulative reward estimates are updated using a stochastic differential equation (SDE).
Strategies are adjusted in real-time using probability distributions derived from these cumulative estimates.
The paper demonstrates that the continuous-time regret bounds are comparable to those in discrete-time when tuned, showing the strength of continuous-time adaptations.
Adversarial Linear Bandits
Discrete-Time Scenario
Here, just like in adversarial bandits, but with the twist of correlated arms, the learner:
Picks an arm and observes the reward.
Uses these observations to update beliefs and strategies.
Continuous-Time Jump
In continuous-time:
The approach involves updating cumulative reward estimates using SDEs.
Probabilities for picking arms are continuously adjusted to minimize regret.
The result—continuous-time regret bounded by 2Tdlnk—is significant, reaffirming that the approach can handle large-scale problems with many arms effectively.
Implications and Future Directions
To wrap things up, this exploration into continuous-time learning shows promising potential. By leveraging continuous updates and cumulative estimations, it's possible to achieve regret bounds that are competetive with, and in some cases may even outperform, their discrete-time counterparts. This work lays down the groundwork for future research in other domains like:
Online convex optimization
Semi-bandits and combinatorial bandits
Stochastic bandits
Future work may explore these areas, develop more sophisticated algorithms, and explore practical applications. With continuous-time models, there is an opportunity to redefine how we approach and solve online learning problems, potentially with increased efficiency and real-time adaptability.
So, whether you're optimizing portfolios, managing ad campaigns, or any other scenario involving sequential decision-making, continuous-time online learning presents an innovative pathway worth exploring.