Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
173 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Physics-Informed Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for DC Blocker Placement (2405.10389v1)

Published 16 May 2024 in eess.SY, cs.LG, and cs.SY

Abstract: The threat of geomagnetic disturbances (GMDs) to the reliable operation of the bulk energy system has spurred the development of effective strategies for mitigating their impacts. One such approach involves placing transformer neutral blocking devices, which interrupt the path of geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) to limit their impact. The high cost of these devices and the sparsity of transformers that experience high GICs during GMD events, however, calls for a sparse placement strategy that involves high computational cost. To address this challenge, we developed a physics-informed heterogeneous graph neural network (PIHGNN) for solving the graph-based dc-blocker placement problem. Our approach combines a heterogeneous graph neural network (HGNN) with a physics-informed neural network (PINN) to capture the diverse types of nodes and edges in ac/dc networks and incorporates the physical laws of the power grid. We train the PIHGNN model using a surrogate power flow model and validate it using case studies. Results demonstrate that PIHGNN can effectively and efficiently support the deployment of GIC dc-current blockers, ensuring the continued supply of electricity to meet societal demands. Our approach has the potential to contribute to the development of more reliable and resilient power grids capable of withstanding the growing threat that GMDs pose.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (27)
  1. NERC and U.S. Department of Energy. High-Impact, Low-Frequency Event Risk to the North American Bulk Power System. Technical report, North American Electric Reliability Corporation, Jun. 2010.
  2. R. Pirjola. Geomagnetically Induced Currents During Magnetic Storms. IEEE Plasma Sci., 28(6):1867–1873, Dec. 2000.
  3. NERC. Effects of Geomagnetic Disturbances on the Bulk Power System System. Technical report, North American Electric Reliability Corporation, 2012.
  4. A. K. Barnes et al. The Risk of Hidden Failures to the United States Electrical Grid and Potential for Mitigation. In Proc. of the 2021 IEEE 53rd North American Power Symposium, Nov. 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03439.
  5. A. Mate et al. Relaxation Based Modeling of GMD Induced Cascading Failures in PowerModelsGMD.jl. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/PES 53rd North American Power Symposium, 2021.
  6. A. Mate et al. Analyzing and Mitigating the Impacts of GMD and EMP Events on the Electrical Grid with PowerModelsGMD.jl, Jan. 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.05042.
  7. P.-H. Yang et al. Optimal Placement of Grounding Small Resistance in Neutral Point for Restraining Voltage Fluctuation in Power Grid Caused by Geomagnetic Storm. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 13(8):1456–1465, Apr. 2019.
  8. R. Horton. Magnetohydrodynamic Electromagnetic Pulse Assessment of the Continental U.S. Electric Grid: Geomagnetically Induced Current and Transformer Thermal Analysis. Technical Report 3002009001, Electric Power Research Institute, Feb. 2017.
  9. D. K. Molzahn et al. A Survey of Distributed Optimization and Control Algorithms for Electric Power Systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 8(6):2941–2962, 2017.
  10. L. A. Roald et al. Power Systems Optimization Under Uncertainty: A Review of Methods and Applications. Electric Power Systems Research, 214:108725, 2023.
  11. P. Panciatici et al. Advanced Optimization Methods for Power Systems. In 2014 Power Systems Computation Conference, pages 1–18. IEEE, 2014.
  12. A. Kody et al. Modeling the AC Power Flow Equations with Optimally Compact Neural Networks: Application to Unit Commitment. Electric Power Systems Research, 213:108282, 2022.
  13. F. Fioretto et al. Predicting AC Optimal Power Flows: Combining Deep Learning and Lagrangian Dual Methods. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, pages 630–637, 2020.
  14. W. Chen et al. Learning Optimization Proxies for Large-Scale Security-Constrained Economic Dispatch. Electric Power Systems Research, 213:108566, 2022.
  15. D. Owerko et al. Optimal Power Flow Using Graph Neural Networks. In IEEE 2020 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 5930–5934. IEEE, 2020.
  16. B. Donon et al. Neural Networks for Power Flow: Graph Neural Solver. Electric Power Systems Research, 189:106547, 2020.
  17. W. Liao et al. Short-Term Power Prediction for Renewable Energy Using Hybrid Graph Convolutional Cetwork and Long Short-Term Memory Approach. Electric Power Systems Research, 211:108614, 2022.
  18. S. Park et al. Confidence-aware Graph Neural Networks for Learning Reliability Assessment Commitments. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2023.
  19. Integration of geomagnetic disturbance modeling into the power flow: A methodology for large-scale system studies. In North American Power Symposium (NAPS), 2012, pages 1–7. IEEE, September 2012.
  20. M. Raissi et al. Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Deep Learning Framework for Solving Forward and Inverse Problems Involving Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations. Journal of Computational physics, 378:686–707, 2019.
  21. Physics-informed neural networks for heat transfer problems. Journal of Heat Transfer, 143(6):060801, 2021.
  22. Neural spectral methods: Self-supervised learning in the spectral domain. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.05225, 2023.
  23. Beyond finite layer neural networks: Bridging deep architectures and numerical differential equations. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 3276–3285. PMLR, 2018.
  24. Scaling physics-informed hard constraints with mixture-of-experts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13412, 2024.
  25. C. Coffrin et al. Relaxations of AC Maximal Load Delivery for Severe Contingency Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34(2):1450–1458, 2018.
  26. Heuristic algorithms for placing geomagnetically induced current blocking devices. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.09409, 2023.
  27. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In Yoshua Bengio and Yann LeCun, editors, 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 7-9, 2015, Conference Track Proceedings, 2015.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com