Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Analysis of the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge (2405.09787v1)

Published 16 May 2024 in eess.IV, cs.CV, and cs.LG

Abstract: We describe the design and results from the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge. The BraTS Meningioma Challenge differed from prior BraTS Glioma challenges in that it focused on meningiomas, which are typically benign extra-axial tumors with diverse radiologic and anatomical presentation and a propensity for multiplicity. Nine participating teams each developed deep-learning automated segmentation models using image data from the largest multi-institutional systematically expert annotated multilabel multi-sequence meningioma MRI dataset to date, which included 1000 training set cases, 141 validation set cases, and 283 hidden test set cases. Each case included T2, T2/FLAIR, T1, and T1Gd brain MRI sequences with associated tumor compartment labels delineating enhancing tumor, non-enhancing tumor, and surrounding non-enhancing T2/FLAIR hyperintensity. Participant automated segmentation models were evaluated and ranked based on a scoring system evaluating lesion-wise metrics including dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff Distance. The top ranked team had a lesion-wise median dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.976, 0.976, and 0.964 for enhancing tumor, tumor core, and whole tumor, respectively and a corresponding average DSC of 0.899, 0.904, and 0.871, respectively. These results serve as state-of-the-art benchmarks for future pre-operative meningioma automated segmentation algorithms. Additionally, we found that 1286 of 1424 cases (90.3%) had at least 1 compartment voxel abutting the edge of the skull-stripped image edge, which requires further investigation into optimal pre-processing face anonymization steps.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (38)
  1. Synapse: Brain tumor segmentation (brats) cluster of challenges. https://www.synapse.org/#!Synapse:syn51156910/wiki/, 2023.
  2. The rsna-asnr-miccai brats 2021 benchmark on brain tumor segmentation and radiogenomic classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.02314, 2021.
  3. Advancing the cancer genome atlas glioma mri collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features. Scientific data, 4(1):1–13, 2017.
  4. A technique for the deidentification of structural brain mr images. Human brain mapping, 28(9):892–903, 2007.
  5. Preoperative brain tumor imaging: Models and software for segmentation and standardized reporting. Frontiers in neurology, 13:932219, 2022.
  6. E. Calabrese and D. LaBella. 2023 brats meningioma dataset. https://www.synapse.org/#!Synapse:syn51514106, 2023.
  7. D. Capellan-Martin. Brats challenge 2023: Model ensemble for brain tumor segmentation in mri. In MICCAI, Vancouver, Canada, 2023.
  8. Diagnosis and management of glioblastoma: A comprehensive perspective. Journal of personalized medicine, 11(4):258, 2021.
  9. State of the art survey on mri brain tumor segmentation. Magnetic resonance imaging, 31(8):1426–1438, 2013.
  10. Brain tumor segmentation with deep neural networks. Medical image analysis, 35:18–31, 2017.
  11. Z. Huang et al. Exploring model size and patch size for brats23 challenge. In MICCAI, Vancouver, Canada, 2023.
  12. Review of mri-based brain tumor image segmentation using deep learning methods. Procedia Computer Science, 102:317–324, 2016.
  13. Identification from mri with face-recognition software. The New England Journal of Medicine, 382(5):489–490, 2020.
  14. Federated benchmarking of medical artificial intelligence with medperf. Nature Machine Intelligence, 5(7):799–810, 2023.
  15. The brain tumor segmentation (brats) challenge 2023: Focus on pediatrics (cbtn-connect-dipgr-asnr-miccai brats-peds). ArXiv, 2023.
  16. The many faces of glioblastoma: Pictorial review of atypical imaging features. The Neuroradiology Journal, 34(1):33–41, 2021.
  17. Dominic LaBella. MeningiomaAnalysis. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10685213, 2024.
  18. The asnr-miccai brain tumor segmentation (brats) challenge 2023: Intracranial meningioma. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07642, 2023.
  19. A multi-institutional meningioma mri dataset for automated multi-sequence image segmentation. Scientific Data, 11:496, 2024. 10.1038/s41597-024-03350-9. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03350-9.
  20. Anocef consensus guideline on target volume delineation for meningiomas radiotherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 114(3):e46, 2022.
  21. The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (brats). IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 34(10):1993–2024, 2014.
  22. MLCommons Association. Mlcube: Standardizing ml deployment. https://mlcommons.org/working-groups/data/mlcube/, 2024. Accessed: 2024-05-08.
  23. The brain tumor segmentation (brats-mets) challenge 2023: Brain metastasis segmentation on pre-treatment mri. ArXiv, 2023.
  24. Auto3dseg for brain tumor segmentation from 3d mri in brats 2023 challenge. In MICCAI, Vancouver, Canada, 2023.
  25. Meningioma: a review of epidemiology, pathology, diagnosis, treatment, and future directions. Biomedicines, 9(3):319, 2021.
  26. The federated tumor segmentation (fets) tool: an open-source solution to further solid tumor research. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 67(20):204002, 2022.
  27. Gandlf: the generally nuanced deep learning framework for scalable end-to-end clinical workflows. Communications Engineering, 2(1):23, 2023.
  28. Brain tumor segmentation using convolutional neural networks in mri images. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 35(5):1240–1251, 2016.
  29. High-risk meningioma: initial outcomes from nrg oncology/rtog 0539. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics, 106(4):790–799, 2020.
  30. Intermediate-risk meningioma: initial outcomes from nrg oncology rtog 0539. Journal of neurosurgery, 129(1):35–47, 2017.
  31. J. Rudie. Brats 2023 segmentation metrics: Clinical relevance. In Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI, Vancouver, Canada, 2023.
  32. R. Saluja. Lesion-wise performance metrics for brats-2023 segmentation challenges. In Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI, Vancouver, Canada, 2023.
  33. Identification of anonymous mri research participants with face-recognition software. New England Journal of Medicine, 381(17):1684–1686, 2019.
  34. Changing the face of neuroimaging research: comparing a new mri de-facing technique with popular alternatives. NeuroImage, 231:117845, 2021.
  35. Brain extraction on mri scans in presence of diffuse glioma: Multi-institutional performance evaluation of deep learning methods and robust modality-agnostic training. NeuroImage, 220:117081, 2020.
  36. Skull-stripping of glioblastoma mri scans using 3d deep learning. In International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop, pages 57–68. Springer, 2019.
  37. Multisite comparison of mri defacing software across multiple cohorts. Frontiers in psychiatry, 12:617997, 2021.
  38. Magnetic resonance imaging of meningiomas: a pictorial review. Insights into imaging, 5(1):113–122, 2014.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (121)
  1. Dominic LaBella (13 papers)
  2. Ujjwal Baid (34 papers)
  3. Omaditya Khanna (1 paper)
  4. Shan McBurney-Lin (3 papers)
  5. Ryan McLean (3 papers)
  6. Pierre Nedelec (5 papers)
  7. Arif Rashid (4 papers)
  8. Nourel Hoda Tahon (6 papers)
  9. Talissa Altes (5 papers)
  10. Radhika Bhalerao (2 papers)
  11. Yaseen Dhemesh (4 papers)
  12. Devon Godfrey (4 papers)
  13. Fathi Hilal (2 papers)
  14. Scott Floyd (6 papers)
  15. Anastasia Janas (12 papers)
  16. Anahita Fathi Kazerooni (16 papers)
  17. John Kirkpatrick (5 papers)
  18. Collin Kent (2 papers)
  19. Florian Kofler (52 papers)
  20. Kevin Leu (2 papers)
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.