Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Naturalistic Music Decoding from EEG Data via Latent Diffusion Models (2405.09062v5)

Published 15 May 2024 in cs.SD, cs.LG, and eess.AS

Abstract: In this article, we explore the potential of using latent diffusion models, a family of powerful generative models, for the task of reconstructing naturalistic music from electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. Unlike simpler music with limited timbres, such as MIDI-generated tunes or monophonic pieces, the focus here is on intricate music featuring a diverse array of instruments, voices, and effects, rich in harmonics and timbre. This study represents an initial foray into achieving general music reconstruction of high-quality using non-invasive EEG data, employing an end-to-end training approach directly on raw data without the need for manual pre-processing and channel selection. We train our models on the public NMED-T dataset and perform quantitative evaluation proposing neural embedding-based metrics. Our work contributes to the ongoing research in neural decoding and brain-computer interfaces, offering insights into the feasibility of using EEG data for complex auditory information reconstruction.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (47)
  1. “Brain2music: Reconstructing music from human brain activity,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.11078, 2023.
  2. “Mulan: A joint embedding of music audio and natural language,” in Ismir 2022 Hybrid Conference, 2022.
  3. “Musiclm: Generating music from text,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11325, 2023.
  4. “Music can be reconstructed from human auditory cortex activity using nonlinear decoding models,” PLOS Biology, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1–27, 08 2023.
  5. Apple Inc, “Biosignal sensing device using dynamic selection of electrodes,” 2023, US Patent US20230225659A1.
  6. Ian Daly, “Neural decoding of music from the eeg,” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 624, 2023.
  7. “Long short-term memory,” Neural Comput., vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735–1780, nov 1997.
  8. “Decoding speech perception from non-invasive brain recordings,” Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1097–1107, 2023.
  9. “Generative modeling by estimating gradients of the data distribution,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 32, 2019.
  10. “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 6840–6851, 2020.
  11. “Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 34, pp. 8780–8794, 2021.
  12. “High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2022, pp. 10684–10695.
  13. “Video generation models as world simulators,” 2024.
  14. “Diffwave: A versatile diffusion model for audio synthesis,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
  15. “Wavegrad: Estimating gradients for waveform generation,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
  16. “Full-band general audio synthesis with score-based diffusion,” in ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5.
  17. “Audioldm 2: Learning holistic audio generation with self-supervised pretraining,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.05734, 2023.
  18. “Syncfusion: Multimodal onset-synchronized video-to-audio foley synthesis,” in ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2024, pp. 936–940.
  19. “T-foley: A controllable waveform-domain diffusion model for temporal-event-guided foley sound synthesis,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.09294, 2024.
  20. “Diffusion-based generative speech source separation,” in ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5.
  21. “Separate and diffuse: Using a pretrained diffusion model for better source separation,” in The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024.
  22. “Conditioning and sampling in variational diffusion models for speech super-resolution,” in ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5.
  23. “Moûsai: Text-to-music generation with long-context latent diffusion,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11757, 2023.
  24. “Fast timing-conditioned latent audio diffusion,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.04825, 2024.
  25. “Multi-source diffusion models for simultaneous music generation and separation,” in The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
  26. “Instructme: An instruction guided music edit and remix framework with latent diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14360, 2023.
  27. “Generalized multi-source inference for text conditioned music diffusion models,” in ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2024, pp. 6980–6984.
  28. “Stemgen: A music generation model that listens,” in ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1116–1120.
  29. “Cocola: Coherence-oriented contrastive learning of musical audio representations,” 2024.
  30. “Dreamdiffusion: Generating high-quality images from brain eeg signals,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.16934, 2023.
  31. “Seeing through the brain: Image reconstruction of visual perception from human brain signals,” 2023.
  32. “Brain-conditional multimodal synthesis: A survey and taxonomy,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.00430, 2023.
  33. “Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 3836–3847.
  34. “Controllable mind visual diffusion model,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024, vol. 38, pp. 6935–6943.
  35. “Nmed-t: A tempo-focused dataset of cortical and behavioral responses to naturalistic music,” in International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, 2017.
  36. “Score-based generative modeling in latent space,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 34, pp. 11287–11302, 2021.
  37. “Auto-encoding variational bayes,” in 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2014, Banff, AB, Canada, April 14-16, 2014, Conference Track Proceedings, Yoshua Bengio and Yann LeCun, Eds., 2014.
  38. “U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18. Springer, 2015, pp. 234–241.
  39. “Denoising diffusion implicit models,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
  40. “Clap learning audio concepts from natural language supervision,” in ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5.
  41. “Large-scale contrastive language-audio pretraining with feature fusion and keyword-to-caption augmentation,” in ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5.
  42. “High fidelity neural audio compression,” Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2023.
  43. “Fr\\\backslash\’echet audio distance: A reference-free metric for evaluating music enhancement algorithms,” in Proc. Interspeech, 2019, pp. 2350–2354.
  44. “Cnn architectures for large-scale audio classification,” in 2017 ieee international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (icassp). IEEE, 2017, pp. 131–135.
  45. “Adapting frechet audio distance for generative music evaluation,” in ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1331–1335.
  46. Don M. Tucker, “Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 154–163, 1993.
  47. “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Emilian Postolache (11 papers)
  2. Natalia Polouliakh (3 papers)
  3. Hiroaki Kitano (6 papers)
  4. Akima Connelly (1 paper)
  5. Taketo Akama (13 papers)
  6. Emanuele Rodolà (90 papers)
  7. Luca Cosmo (24 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates decoding high-fidelity music from non-invasive EEG using latent diffusion models and ControlNet, outperforming conventional baselines.
  • The methodology maps EEG signals into a latent audio space through a controlled diffusion process, with performance validated by neural metrics like CLAP Score.
  • Results show improved audio reconstruction quality, achieving a CLAP Score of 0.60 and opening avenues for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces.

Decoding Music from Brain Waves Using Diffusion Models

Introduction

Imagine listening to your favorite song and having a machine decode that same music from your brain activity. That's essentially what this research paper is about. The authors explore using latent diffusion models to reconstruct complex, high-quality music from electroencephalogram (EEG) data. Previous approaches have demonstrated the feasibility of reconstructing music using more invasive techniques like electrocorticography (ECoG) or less practical ones like fMRI. This paper focuses on non-invasive EEG data, using advanced generative models to achieve this feat.

Diffusion Models and ControlNet

First off, what's a diffusion model? In simple terms, it's a type of generative model that can generate complex data—from text to images, and now, even music. Diffusion models work by learning to reverse a process where data is gradually noised until it becomes unrecognizable, effectively learning how to "denoise" data back to its original form.

ControlNet, a technique employed in this paper, is used specifically to condition these diffusion models on additional data—in this case, EEG recordings. By doing this, ControlNet allows the model to generate specific types of data (like music) influenced by EEG signals.

Methodology

For this paper, the authors utilize the NMED-T dataset, which contains EEG recordings of 20 individuals listening to 10 different songs. The goal is to decode these recordings into high-quality music. The primary tool here is AudioLDM2, a pre-trained diffusion model on audio that uses ControlNet as an adapter to condition the model on EEG data.

Here's a quick breakdown of their approach:

  1. EEG-Conditioned ControlNet: The researchers use ControlNet to adapt the AudioLDM2 model for EEG data. This involves a minimal pre-processing step, primarily centering and clamping the data.
  2. Latent Diffusion Process: Audio signals (mel-spectrograms) are mapped to a latent space, and the diffusion model is trained to revert a forward Gaussian process, effectively denoising data to its original form.
  3. Neural Embedding-Based Metrics: To evaluate the model, the authors use metrics like the Fréchet Audio Distance (FAD) and CLAP Score, both of which measure the quality of audio generation. These metrics help understand how close the generated music is to the original, at a more semantic level.

Results

Let’s talk numbers. The researchers did a comprehensive evaluation using different setups and metrics. The key takeaways are:

  • Their EEG-conditioned ControlNet model significantly outperformed a simple convolutional neural network baseline in generating high-quality music.
  • Using metrics like the CLAP Score and Pearson Coefficient, the ControlNet-based models demonstrated improved performance, registering higher similarity scores to the actual tracks.
  • The best performance was noted from models trained exclusively on specific subjects’ data (ControlNet-2), achieving a CLAP Score of 0.60.

Additionally, the researchers performed a classification task, attempting to classify generated tracks back to their original categories. Their model produced confusion matrices much closer to a diagonal, indicating higher accuracy compared to the convolutional baseline.

Implications and Future Directions

From a practical standpoint, this research opens up intriguing possibilities. Think about the potential applications in brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), where users could generate music or other forms of data directly from their brain activity. Therapeutically, this might also help in neural rehabilitation, providing a medium for patients to engage with their environments in new ways.

Theoretically, the paper demonstrates the efficacy of diffusion models for complex generative tasks beyond traditional datasets like images or text. As we improve our ability to decode complex auditory information from EEG data, future work could focus on larger-scale datasets and more generalized models. There’s also room for adapting these models to higher-resolution brain data and exploring more nuanced aspects of human cognition and perception.

In summary, the paper makes a compelling case for using latent diffusion models in decoding intricate music from non-invasive brain activity, marking a significant step in neural decoding and BCI research. It’s a fascinating glimpse into how far we’ve come and what lies ahead in the intersection of AI and neuroscience.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com