Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
AI Research Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 81 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 42 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 188 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 454 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Identifying Peer Effects in Networks with Unobserved Effort and Isolated Students (2405.06850v1)

Published 10 May 2024 in econ.EM

Abstract: Peer influence on effort devoted to some activity is often studied using proxy variables when actual effort is unobserved. For instance, in education, academic effort is often proxied by GPA. We propose an alternative approach that circumvents this approximation. Our framework distinguishes unobserved shocks to GPA that do not affect effort from preference shocks that do affect effort levels. We show that peer effects estimates obtained using our approach can differ significantly from classical estimates (where effort is approximated) if the network includes isolated students. Applying our approach to data on high school students in the United States, we find that peer effect estimates relying on GPA as a proxy for effort are 40% lower than those obtained using our approach.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (51)
  1. Alan, S., C. Baysan, M. Gumren, and E. Kubilay (2021): “Building social cohesion in ethnically mixed schools: An intervention on perspective taking,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136, 2147–2194.
  2. Albert, J. H. and S. Chib (1993): “Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 669–679.
  3. Arcidiacono, P., G. Foster, N. Goodpaster, and J. Kinsler (2012): “Estimating spillovers using panel data, with an application to the classroom,” Quantitative Economics, 3, 421–470.
  4. Ballester, C., A. Calvó-Armengol, and Y. Zenou (2006): “Who’s Who in Networks. Wanted: The Key Player,” Econometrica, 74, 1403–1417.
  5. Blume, L. E., W. A. Brock, S. N. Durlauf, and Y. M. Ioannides (2011): “Identification of social interactions,” in Handbook of social economics, Elsevier, vol. 1, 853–964.
  6. Boucher, V. and B. Fortin (2016): “Some Challenges in the Empirics of the Effects of Networks,” Handbook on the Economics of Networks, 45–48.
  7. Boucher, V., S. Tumen, M. Vlassopoulos, J. Wahba, and Y. Zenou (2021): “Ethnic Mixing in Early Childhood: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment and a Structural Model,” Tech. rep., CEPR Discussion Paper No.15528.
  8. Bramoullé, Y., H. Djebbari, and B. Fortin (2020): “Peer effects in networks: A survey,” Annual Review of Economics, 12, 603–629.
  9. Bramoullé, Y., H. Djebbari, and B. Fortin (2009): “Identification of peer effects through social networks,” Journal of Econometrics, 150, 41–55.
  10. Calvó-Armengol, A., E. Patacchini, and Y. Zenou (2009): “Peer Effects and Social Networks in Education,” The Review of Economic Studies, 76, 1239–1267.
  11. Conti, G., A. Galeotti, G. Mueller, and S. Pudney (2013): “Popularity,” Journal of Human Resources, 48, 1072–1094.
  12. Cornelissen, T., C. Dustmann, and U. Schönberg (2017): “Peer effects in the workplace,” American Economic Review, 107, 425–456.
  13. Davezies, L., X. d’Haultfoeuille, and D. Fougère (2009): “Identification of peer effects using group size variation,” The Econometrics Journal, 12, 397–413.
  14. De Giorgi, G., M. Pellizzari, and S. Redaelli (2010): “Identification of social interactions through partially overlapping peer groups,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2, 241–275.
  15. De Paula, Á. (2017): “Econometrics of network models,” in Advances in economics and econometrics: Theory and applications, eleventh world congress, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 268–323.
  16. ——— (2020): “Econometric models of network formation,” Annual Review of Economics, 12, 775–799.
  17. Duncan, G. J., J. Boisjoly, and K. Mullan Harris (2001): “Sibling, peer, neighbor, and schoolmate correlations as indicators of the importance of context for adolescent development,” Demography, 38, 437–447.
  18. Durlauf, S. N. and Y. M. Ioannides (2010): “Social interactions,” Annu. Rev. Econ., 2, 451–478.
  19. Dzemski, A. (2019): “An empirical model of dyadic link formation in a network with unobserved heterogeneity,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 101, 763–776.
  20. Epple, D. and R. E. Romano (2011): “Peer effects in education: A survey of the theory and evidence,” in Handbook of Social Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1, 1053–1163.
  21. Fortin, B. and M. Yazbeck (2015): “Peer effects, fast food consumption and adolescent weight gain,” Journal of Health Economics, 42, 125–138.
  22. Fruehwirth, J. C. (2013): “Identifying peer achievement spillovers: Implications for desegregation and the achievement gap,” Quantitative Economics, 4, 85–124.
  23. ——— (2014): “Can achievement peer effect estimates inform policy? a view from inside the black box,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 96, 514–523.
  24. Goldsmith-Pinkham, P. and G. W. Imbens (2013): “Social networks and the identification of peer effects,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 31, 253–264.
  25. Graham, B. S. (2008): “Identifying social interactions through conditional variance restrictions,” Econometrica, 76, 643–660.
  26. ——— (2017): “An econometric model of network formation with degree heterogeneity,” Econometrica, 85, 1033–1063.
  27. Griffith, A. (2022): “Name your friends, but only five? the importance of censoring in peer effects estimates using social network data,” Journal of Labor Economics, 40, 779–805.
  28. Hastie, T. J. (2017): “Generalized additive models,” in Statistical models in S, Routledge, 249–307.
  29. Hausman, J. A. (1978): “Specification tests in econometrics,” Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 1251–1271.
  30. Hong, S. C. and J. Lee (2017): “Who is sitting next to you? Peer effects inside the classroom,” Quantitative Economics, 8, 239–275.
  31. Houndetoungan, E. A. (2022): “Count data models with social interactions under rational expectations,” Tech. rep., SSNR.
  32. Hsieh, C.-S. and L. F. Lee (2016): “A social interactions model with endogenous friendship formation and selectivity,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 31, 301–319.
  33. Hsieh, C.-S. and X. Lin (2017): “Gender and racial peer effects with endogenous network formation,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 67, 135–147.
  34. Jackson, M. O. and Y. Zenou (2015): “Games on networks,” in Handbook of game theory with economic applications, Elsevier, vol. 4, 95–163.
  35. Jochmans, K. (2023): “Peer effects and endogenous social interactions,” Journal of Econometrics, 235, 1203–1214.
  36. Johnsson, I. and H. R. Moon (2021): “Estimation of peer effects in endogenous social networks: control function approach,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 103, 328–345.
  37. Kelejian, H. H. and I. R. Prucha (1998): “A generalized spatial two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances,” The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 17, 99–121.
  38. Kline, B. and E. Tamer (2020): “Econometric analysis of models with social interactions,” in The Econometric Analysis of Network Data, Elsevier, 149–181.
  39. Lancaster, T. (2000): “The incidental parameter problem since 1948,” Journal of Econometrics, 95, 391–413.
  40. Lee, L.-F. (2004): “Asymptotic distributions of quasi-maximum likelihood estimators for spatial autoregressive models,” Econometrica, 72, 1899–1925.
  41. ——— (2007): “Identification and estimation of econometric models with group interactions, contextual factors and fixed effects,” Journal of Econometrics, 140, 333–374.
  42. Lee, L.-f., X. Liu, and X. Lin (2010): “Specification and estimation of social interaction models with network structures,” The Econometrics Journal, 13, 145–176.
  43. Lin, X. (2010): “Identifying Peer Effects in Student Academic Achievement by Spatial Autoregressive Models with Group Unobservables,” Journal of Labor Economics, 28, 825–860.
  44. Manski, C. F. (1993): “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem,” The Review of Economic Studies, 60, 531–542.
  45. Mas, A. and E. Moretti (2009): “Peers at work,” American Economic Review, 99, 112–145.
  46. Newey, W. K. and D. McFadden (1994): “Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing,” Handbook of Econometrics, 4, 2111–2245.
  47. Rose, C. D. (2017): “Identification of peer effects through social networks using variance restrictions,” The Econometrics Journal, 20, S47–S60.
  48. Sacerdote, B. (2011): “Peer effects in education: How might they work, how big are they and how much do we know thus far?” in Handbook of the Economics of Education, Elsevier, vol. 3, 249–277.
  49. Theil, H. (1957): “Specification errors and the estimation of economic relationships,” Revue de l’Institut International de Statistique, 25, 41–51.
  50. White, H. (1980): “A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity,” Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 817–838.
  51. Yan, T., B. Jiang, S. E. Fienberg, and C. Leng (2019): “Statistical inference in a directed network model with covariates,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 114, 857–868.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 post and received 0 likes.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to View