Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
166 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Digital Twin Calibration for Biological System-of-Systems: Cell Culture Manufacturing Process (2405.03913v2)

Published 7 May 2024 in q-bio.QM, cs.LG, and stat.ML

Abstract: Biomanufacturing innovation relies on an efficient Design of Experiments (DoEs) to optimize processes and product quality. Traditional DoE methods, ignoring the underlying bioprocessing mechanisms, often suffer from a lack of interpretability and sample efficiency. This limitation motivates us to create a new optimal learning approach for digital twin model calibration. In this study, we consider the cell culture process multi-scale mechanistic model, also known as Biological System-of-Systems (Bio-SoS). This model with a modular design, composed of sub-models, allows us to integrate data across various production processes. To calibrate the Bio-SoS digital twin, we evaluate the mean squared error of model prediction and develop a computational approach to quantify the impact of parameter estimation error of individual sub-models on the prediction accuracy of digital twin, which can guide sample-efficient and interpretable DoEs.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (10)
  1. Stochastic biological system-of-systems modelling for ipsc culture. Communications Biology, 7, 01 2024. doi:10.1038/s42003-023-05653-w.
  2. Stochastic simulation under input uncertainty: A review. Operations Research Perspectives, 7:100162, 2020. ISSN 2214-7160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2020.100162. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221471602030052X.
  3. Bayesian calibration of computer models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 63(3):425–464, 2001. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00294. URL https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9868.00294.
  4. A theoretical framework for calibration in computer models: Parametrization, estimation and convergence properties. SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, 4(1):767–795, 2016. doi:10.1137/151005841. URL https://doi.org/10.1137/151005841.
  5. Continuous Time Markov Chain Models for Chemical Reaction Networks, pages 3–42. Springer New York, New York, NY, 2011. ISBN 978-1-4419-6766-4. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6766-4_1. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6766-4_1.
  6. Kinetic modeling of mammalian cell culture bioprocessing: The quest to advance biomanufacturing. Biotechnology Journal, 13(3):1700229, 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201700229. URL https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/biot.201700229.
  7. Metabolic regulatory network kinetic modeling with multiple isotopic tracers for ipscs. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 121(4):1335–1353, 2024. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.28609. URL https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bit.28609.
  8. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. International Conference on Learning Representations, 2014.
  9. Inference for reaction networks using the linear noise approximation. Biometrics, 70(2):457–466, 2014. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12152. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/biom.12152.
  10. Analyzing clonal variation of monoclonal antibody-producing cho cell lines using an in silico metabolomic platform. PLOS ONE, 9, 2014. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:5913733.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.