Risk-Aware Coverage Path Planning for Lunar Micro-Rovers Leveraging Global and Local Environmental Data (2404.18721v1)
Abstract: This paper presents a novel 3D myopic coverage path planning algorithm for lunar micro-rovers that can explore unknown environments with limited sensing and computational capabilities. The algorithm expands upon traditional non-graph path planning methods to accommodate the complexities of lunar terrain, utilizing global data with local topographic features into motion cost calculations. The algorithm also integrates localization and mapping to update the rover's pose and map the environment. The resulting environment map's accuracy is evaluated and tested in a 3D simulator. Outdoor field tests were conducted to validate the algorithm's efficacy in sim-to-real scenarios. The results showed that the algorithm could achieve high coverage with low energy consumption and computational cost, while incrementally exploring the terrain and avoiding obstacles. This study contributes to the advancement of path planning methodologies for space exploration, paving the way for efficient, scalable and autonomous exploration of lunar environments by small rovers.
- NASA. Moon missions. [Online]. Available: https://science.nasa.gov/moon/missions/
- NASA. Mars exploration missions. [Online]. Available: https://mars.nasa.gov/mars-exploration/missions
- M. J. Schuster et al., “The arches space-analogue demonstration mission: Towards heterogeneous teams of autonomous robots for collaborative scientific sampling in planetary exploration,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 5315–5322, 2020.
- E. Galceran and M. Carreras, “A survey on coverage path planning for robotics,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 1258–1276, 2013.
- P. Raja and S. Pugazhenthi, “Optimal path planning of mobile robots: A review,” International journal of physical sciences, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 1314–1320, 2012.
- J. Carsten, A. Rankin, D. Ferguson, and A. Stentz, “Global path planning on board the mars exploration rovers,” in 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2007, pp. 1–11.
- T. Oikawa, T. Tanaka, J. Walker, K. Uno, P. Costa, N. Britton, and K. Yoshida, “Thermal design and analysis of conceptual flight model for a lunar exploration rover,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Artificia Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (i-SAIRAS), 2016.
- T. Tanaka and H. Malki, “A deep learning approach to lunar rover global path planning using environmental constraints and the rover internal resource status,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 3, 2024.
- K. Skonieczny, D. K. Shukla, M. Faragalli, M. Cole, and K. D. Iagnemma, “Data-driven mobility risk prediction for planetary rovers,” Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 475–491, 2019.
- M. Endo and G. Ishigami, “Active traversability learning via risk-aware information gathering for planetary exploration rovers,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 11 855–11 862, 2022.
- H. Choset, “Coverage for robotics – a survey of recent results,” Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 31, no. 113 - 126, 2001.
- Y. Gabriely and E. Rimon, “Spanning-tree based coverage of continuous areas by a mobile robot,” Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 31, pp. 77–98, 02 2001.
- M. Laine and K. Yoshida, “Multi-rover exploration strategies: Coverage path planning with myopic sensing,” in Field and Service Robotics, G. Ishigami and K. Yoshida, Eds., 2021, pp. 205–218.
- P. Wang, “Research on comparison of lidar and camera in autonomous driving,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2093, no. 1, p. 012032, nov 2021. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2093/1/012032
- M. Robinson, “LRO MOON LROC 5 RDR V1.0,” NASA Planetary Data System (PDS), 2011.
- E. Rohmer, S. Singh, and M. Freese, “V-rep: A versatile and scalable robot simulation framework,” in Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2013, pp. 1321–1326.
- GDAL/OGR, “Geospatial data abstraction software library. open source geospatial foundation,” https://gdal.org, 05 2021.
- W. Masawat, S. Shreya, B. Tamir, P. Gabin, and Y. Kazuya, “High-fidelity robust 3-d lunar environment generation platform for micro-rover simulation-based tasks,” in Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress (IAC), 2022.
- K. Liu, “A comprehensive review of bug algorithms in path planning,” Applied and Computational Engineering, vol. 33, pp. 259–265, 01 2024.
- H. Zhang, Z. Hou, N. Li, and S. Song, “A graph-based hierarchical SLAM framework for large-scale mapping,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Applications, 2012, pp. 439–448.
- K. Koide, J. Miura, M. Yokozuka, S. Oishi, and A. Banno, “Interactive 3d graph slam for map correction,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, pp. 40–47, 01 2021.
- S. Santra, L. B. Paet, M. Laine, K. Yoshida, and E. Staudinger, “Experimental validation of deterministic radio propagation model developed for communication-aware path planning,” in Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 17th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), 2021, pp. 1241–1246.