Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
60 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
8 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

From Persona to Personalization: A Survey on Role-Playing Language Agents (2404.18231v2)

Published 28 Apr 2024 in cs.CL and cs.AI
From Persona to Personalization: A Survey on Role-Playing Language Agents

Abstract: Recent advancements in LLMs have significantly boosted the rise of Role-Playing Language Agents (RPLAs), i.e., specialized AI systems designed to simulate assigned personas. By harnessing multiple advanced abilities of LLMs, including in-context learning, instruction following, and social intelligence, RPLAs achieve a remarkable sense of human likeness and vivid role-playing performance. RPLAs can mimic a wide range of personas, ranging from historical figures and fictional characters to real-life individuals. Consequently, they have catalyzed numerous AI applications, such as emotional companions, interactive video games, personalized assistants and copilots, and digital clones. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive survey of this field, illustrating the evolution and recent progress in RPLAs integrating with cutting-edge LLM technologies. We categorize personas into three types: 1) Demographic Persona, which leverages statistical stereotypes; 2) Character Persona, focused on well-established figures; and 3) Individualized Persona, customized through ongoing user interactions for personalized services. We begin by presenting a comprehensive overview of current methodologies for RPLAs, followed by the details for each persona type, covering corresponding data sourcing, agent construction, and evaluation. Afterward, we discuss the fundamental risks, existing limitations, and future prospects of RPLAs. Additionally, we provide a brief review of RPLAs in AI applications, which reflects practical user demands that shape and drive RPLA research. Through this work, we aim to establish a clear taxonomy of RPLA research and applications, and facilitate future research in this critical and ever-evolving field, and pave the way for a future where humans and RPLAs coexist in harmony.

Comprehensive Survey on Role-Playing Language Agents (RPLAs) Utilizing LLMs

Introduction to RPLA Technology

Role-Playing Language Agents (RPLAs) serve as advanced AI systems designed to assume varied personas, leveraging the capabilities of LLMs. These agents mimic human-like interactions portraying a range of characters from historical figures to fictional characters, creating immersive experiences across several applications like gaming, digital companionship, and personalized digital assistants.

Current Methodologies in RPLAs

Overview of Persona Types

RPLAs integrate personas through three main categories:

  1. Demographic Persona: Focuses on groups characterized by common traits such as occupation or personality types, using statistical stereotypes inherently present in LLMs.
  2. Character Persona: Pertains to well-known individuals or characters from literature and media, requiring a deep understanding of the specific character’s background, traits, and storylines.
  3. Individualized Persona: Builds upon continuously updated personal data to create unique, user-specific personas aiming to deliver personalized user interactions.

Persona Construction and Evaluation

The construction of RPLAs involves fine-tuning LLMs with specific persona data categorized under demographic, character, or individualized types. Evaluation measures include testing the RPLA’s capability to maintain persona consistency, its adaptability in learning context-specific traits, and the effectiveness in personalized user interactions.

Advanced Applications and Future Prospects

RPLAs are now pivotal in various domains, including but not limited to interactive storytelling, personalized learning environments, and sophisticated user interfaces for digital assistants. The ongoing development in LLMs, including improved context management and enhanced learning algorithms, promises significant advancements in the realism and personalization capabilities of RPLAs.

Risks and Ethical Considerations

Potential Risks in Deployment

The deployment of RPLAs involves several risks such as the propagation of biases, potential privacy invasion, and the manifestation of toxic behavior by AI personas. These issues necessitate robust ethical guidelines and innovative solutions to ensure privacy, fairness, and accountability in the use of RPLAs.

  • Bias and Fairness: RPLAs may inadvertently learn and propagate societal biases present in the training data. Addressing these requires careful curation of training datasets and the development of fairness-aware algorithms.
  • Privacy Concerns: Ensuring that RPLAs respect user privacy, especially when dealing with individualized personas, is critical. Techniques like differential privacy and secure data handling must be integrated.

Conclusion and Future Work

In conclusion, while RPLAs provide innovative opportunities for user interaction, their development must be carefully managed to address ethical, privacy, and bias issues. Future research directions include enhancing the understanding capabilities of RPLAs, improving their adaptability to diverse social contexts, and ensuring their safe deployment in sensitive environments.

Supplemental Information

In addition to the main content, further studies on current RPLA products in commercial and experimental stages reflect on practical approaches and user engagement strategies, indicating a sustained interest and significant potential for growth in the role-playing AI domain.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (18)
  1. Jiangjie Chen (46 papers)
  2. Xintao Wang (132 papers)
  3. Rui Xu (198 papers)
  4. Siyu Yuan (46 papers)
  5. Yikai Zhang (41 papers)
  6. Wei Shi (116 papers)
  7. Jian Xie (39 papers)
  8. Shuang Li (203 papers)
  9. Ruihan Yang (43 papers)
  10. Tinghui Zhu (10 papers)
  11. Aili Chen (11 papers)
  12. Nianqi Li (4 papers)
  13. Lida Chen (8 papers)
  14. Caiyu Hu (3 papers)
  15. Siye Wu (16 papers)
  16. Scott Ren (2 papers)
  17. Ziquan Fu (5 papers)
  18. Yanghua Xiao (151 papers)
Citations (38)