Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A new Taxonomy for Automated Driving: Structuring Applications based on their Operational Design Domain, Level of Automation and Automation Readiness (2404.17044v1)

Published 25 Apr 2024 in cs.RO, cs.SY, and eess.SY

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to investigate the relationship between operational design domains (ODD), automated driving SAE Levels, and Technology Readiness Level (TRL). The first highly automated vehicles, like robotaxis, are in commercial use, and the first vehicles with highway pilot systems have been delivered to private customers. It has emerged as a crucial issue that these automated driving systems differ significantly in their ODD and in their technical maturity. Consequently, any approach to compare these systems is difficult and requires a deep dive into defined ODDs, specifications, and technologies used. Therefore, this paper challenges current state-of-the-art taxonomies and develops a new and integrated taxonomy that can structure automated vehicle systems more efficiently. We use the well-known SAE Levels 0-5 as the "level of responsibility", and link and describe the ODD at an intermediate level of abstraction. Finally, a new maturity model is explicitly proposed to improve the comparability of automated vehicles and driving functions. This method is then used to analyze today's existing automated vehicle applications, which are structured into the new taxonomy and rated by the new maturity levels. Our results indicate that this new taxonomy and maturity level model will help to differentiate automated vehicle systems in discussions more clearly and to discover white fields more systematically and upfront, e.g. for research but also for regulatory purposes.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (27)
  1. S. of Automotive Engineers (SAE), “Sae j3016 - taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles,” April 2021.
  2. R. McCall, F. McGee, A. G. Mirnig, A. Meschtscherjakov, N. Louveton, T. Engel, and M. Tscheligi, “A taxonomy of autonomous vehicle handover situations,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2019.
  3. P. Wintersberger, P. Green, and A. Riener, “Am i driving or are you or are we both? a taxonomy for handover and handback in automated driving,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design: driving assessment 2017.   University of Iowa, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1655
  4. A. Gluck, M. Deng, Y. Zhao, C. Menassa, D. Li, J. Brinkley, and V. Kamat, “Exploring driver physiological response during level 3 conditional driving automation,” 2022 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS), pp. 1–5, 2022.
  5. KBA, “Pressemitteilung nr. 49/2021,” https://www.kba.de/DE/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/Allgemein/2021/pm49_2021_erste_Genehmigung_automatisiertes_Fahren.html, 2021, [Accessed 30-01-2024].
  6. D. Hopkins and T. Schwanen, “Talking about automated vehicles: What do levels of automation do?” Technology in Society, vol. 64, p. 101488, 2021.
  7. J. Richardson, K. M. A. Revell, J. Kim, and N. Stanton, “The iconography of vehicle automation—a focus group study,” Human-Intelligent Systems Integration, vol. 3, pp. 251 – 261, 2021.
  8. I. O. for Standardization, “Iso 34503:2023, road vehicles, test scenarios for automated driving systems specification for operational design domain,” August 2023.
  9. C. Sun, Z. Deng, W. Chu, S. Li, and D. Cao, “Acclimatizing the operational design domain for autonomous driving systems,” IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 10–24, 2022.
  10. C. W. Lee, N. Nayeer, D. E. Garcia, A. Agrawal, and B. Liu, “Identifying the operational design domain for an automated driving system through assessed risk,” in 2020 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2020, pp. 1317–1322.
  11. K. Czarnecki, “Operational world model ontology for automated driving systems - part 1: Road structure,” 2018. [Online]. Available: http://rgdoi.net/10.13140/RG.2.2.15521.30568
  12. BSI, “Pas 1883:2020, operational design domain (odd) taxonomy for an automated driving system (ads) – specification,,” online, 2020.
  13. P. Weissensteiner, G. Stettinger, S. Khastgir, and D. Watzenig, “Operational design domain-driven coverage for the safety argumentation of automated vehicles,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 12 263–12 284, 2023.
  14. M. Ito, “Odd description methods for automated driving vehicle and verifiability for safety,” JUCS - Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol. 27, no. 8, p. 796–810, Aug. 2021. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jucs.72333
  15. J. C. Mankins, “Technology readiness level - a white paper,” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247705707_Technology_Readiness_Level_-_A_White_Paper, 1995, accessed: 04-15-2024.
  16. A. Shashua and S. Shalev-Shwartz, “Defining a New Taxonomy for Consumer Autonomous Vehicles,” https://www.mobileye.com/opinion/defining-a-new-taxonomy-for-consumer-autonomous-vehicles/, 2023, [Accessed 10-01-2024].
  17. S. Chen, S. Zong, T. Chen, Z. Huang, Y. Chen, and S. Labi, “A taxonomy for autonomous vehicles considering ambient road infrastructure,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 14, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11258
  18. S. Kugele, A. Petrovska, and I. Gerostathopoulos, “Towards a taxonomy of autonomous systems,” pp. 37–45, 2021.
  19. T. Gamer, M. Hoernicke, B. Kloepper, R. Bauer, and A. Isaksson, “The autonomous industrial plant – future of process engineering, operations and maintenance,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 88, pp. 101–110, 2020.
  20. F. Warg, A. Thorsén, V. Vu, and C. Bergenhem, “A unified taxonomy for automated vehicles: Individual, cooperative, collaborative, on-road, and off-road,” 2023.
  21. T. Machado, A. Ahonen, and R. Ghabcheloo, “Towards a standard taxonomy for levels of automation in heavy-duty mobile machinery,” ASME/BATH 2021 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control, 2021.
  22. B. Williams, “Automated driving levels,” Automated Vehicles and MaaS, 2021.
  23. T. Ishigooka, S. Otsuka, K. Serizawa, R. Tsuchiya, and F. Narisawa, “Graceful degradation design process for autonomous driving system,” pp. 19–34, 2019.
  24. M. Torkjazi and A. Raz, “A taxonomy for system of autonomous systems,” 2022 17th Annual System of Systems Engineering Conference (SOSE), pp. 198–203, 2022.
  25. M. Berghoefer, M. Lutwitzi, and S. Peters, “Systematic derivation of use case clusters for a generalized low-speed automated driving function,” https://www.uni-das.de/images/pdf/fas-workshop/2023/FAS2023-11-Berghoefer.pdf, 2023, [Accessed 25-01-2024].
  26. TransportTopics, “Torc lays out road map to autonomous truck launch in 2027,” https://www.ttnews.com/articles/torc-autonomous-launch-27, [Accessed 20-01-2024].
  27. Caterpillar, “How does an autonomous truck see?” https://www.cat.com/en_US/blog/truck-lidar.html, 2022, [Accessed 30-01-2024].

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com