Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Connected Dependability Cage Approach for Safe Automated Driving (2307.06258v1)

Published 12 Jul 2023 in cs.RO and cs.SE

Abstract: Automated driving systems can be helpful in a wide range of societal challenges, e.g., mobility-on-demand and transportation logistics for last-mile delivery, by aiding the vehicle driver or taking over the responsibility for the dynamic driving task partially or completely. Ensuring the safety of automated driving systems is no trivial task, even more so for those systems of SAE Level 3 or above. To achieve this, mechanisms are needed that can continuously monitor the system's operating conditions, also denoted as the system's operational design domain. This paper presents a safety concept for automated driving systems which uses a combination of onboard runtime monitoring via connected dependability cage and off-board runtime monitoring via a remote command control center, to continuously monitor the system's ODD. On one side, the connected dependability cage fulfills a double functionality: (1) to monitor continuously the operational design domain of the automated driving system, and (2) to transfer the responsibility in a smooth and safe manner between the automated driving system and the off-board remote safety driver, who is present in the remote command control center. On the other side, the remote command control center enables the remote safety driver the monitoring and takeover of the vehicle's control. We evaluate our safety concept for automated driving systems in a lab environment and on a test field track and report on results and lessons learned.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. Towards a holistic software systems engineering approach for dependable autonomous systems. In R. Stolle, S. Scholz, and M. Broy, editors, Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Software Engineering for AI in Autonomous Systems, pages 23–30, New York, NY, USA, 2018. ACM.
  2. Synergistic redundancy: Towards verifiable safety for autonomous vehicles, 2022.
  3. Ergo, SMIRK is safe: a safety case for a machine learning component in a pedestrian automatic emergency brake system. Software Quality Journal, pages 1–69, 2023.
  4. D. Costello and H. Xu. Using a run time assurance approach for certifying autonomy within naval aviation. Systems Engineering, 2023.
  5. Architecting safer autonomous aviation systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.08138, 2023.
  6. Institute for Software and Systems Engineering. Towards safe automated driving: Connected dependability cage & remote command control center. https://youtu.be/L9WD6hC4rWE, November 2022. [Online;  accessed on 14-April-2023].
  7. Assuring the safety of end-to-end learning-based autonomous driving through runtime monitoring. In 2020 23rd Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design (DSD), pages 476–483. IEEE, 2020.
  8. Qualitative monitors based on the connected dependability cage approach. pages 46–55. IARIA, 2022.
  9. ISO. Road vehicles – Functional safety, 2011.
  10. ISO. Road vehicles – Safety of the Intended functionality, 2022.
  11. Certified control: An architecture for verifiable safety of autonomous vehicles, 2021.
  12. M. Mauritz. Engineering of safe autonomous vehicles through seamless integration of system development and system operation. PhD thesis, TU Clausthal, 2020.
  13. From simulation to operation: Using design time artifacts to ensure the safety of advanced driving assistance systems at runtime. In MASE@MoDELS, 2015.
  14. Assuring the safety of advanced driver assistance systems through a combination of simulation and runtime monitoring. In T. Margaria and B. Steffen, editors, Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation: Discussion, Dissemination, Applications, volume 9953 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 672–687. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016.
  15. Dependable adas by combining design time testing and runtime monitoring. In FORMS/FORMAT 2014 - 10th Symposium on Formal Methods for Automation and Safety in Railway and Automotive Systems, 2014.
  16. L. Mesow and F. Knabl. Aadc – audi Autonomous Driving Cars: Eine offene Plattform zur Vorentwicklung und Demonstration von automatischen Fahrfunktionen auf Basis von Modellfahrzeugen (engl.: Audi Autonomous Driving Cars: An open platform for the predevelopment and demonstration of automated driving functions on the basis of model vehicles. pages 25–26, January 2017.
  17. A component-based simplex architecture for high-assurance cyber-physical systems. June 2017.
  18. SAE. Guidelines and methods for conducting the safety assessment process on civil airborne systems and equipment - sae international. https://www.sae.org/standards/content/arp4761, December 1996.
  19. SAE. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems, 2021.
  20. A hierarchy of monitoring properties for autonomous systems. In AIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum, page 2588, 2023.
  21. Schlussbericht VanAssist (engl.: Final report project VanAssist). Technical report, 2021.
  22. L. Sha. Using simplicity to control complexity. IEEE Software, 18(4):20–28, 2001.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Adina Aniculaesei (4 papers)
  2. Iqra Aslam (4 papers)
  3. Daniel Bamal (3 papers)
  4. Felix Helsch (1 paper)
  5. Andreas Vorwald (1 paper)
  6. Meng Zhang (184 papers)
  7. Andreas Rausch (24 papers)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.