Learning Car-Following Behaviors Using Bayesian Matrix Normal Mixture Regression (2404.16023v1)
Abstract: Learning and understanding car-following (CF) behaviors are crucial for microscopic traffic simulation. Traditional CF models, though simple, often lack generalization capabilities, while many data-driven methods, despite their robustness, operate as "black boxes" with limited interpretability. To bridge this gap, this work introduces a Bayesian Matrix Normal Mixture Regression (MNMR) model that simultaneously captures feature correlations and temporal dynamics inherent in CF behaviors. This approach is distinguished by its separate learning of row and column covariance matrices within the model framework, offering an insightful perspective into the human driver decision-making processes. Through extensive experiments, we assess the model's performance across various historical steps of inputs, predictive steps of outputs, and model complexities. The results consistently demonstrate our model's adeptness in effectively capturing the intricate correlations and temporal dynamics present during CF. A focused case study further illustrates the model's outperforming interpretability of identifying distinct operational conditions through the learned mean and covariance matrices. This not only underlines our model's effectiveness in understanding complex human driving behaviors in CF scenarios but also highlights its potential as a tool for enhancing the interpretability of CF behaviors in traffic simulations and autonomous driving systems.
- C. Zhang, R. Chen, J. Zhu, W. Wang, C. Liu, and L. Sun, “Interactive car-following: Matters but not always,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.16127, 2023.
- M. Saifuzzaman and Z. Zheng, “Incorporating human-factors in car-following models: a review of recent developments and research needs,” Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, vol. 48, pp. 379–403, 2014.
- M. Treiber and A. Kesting, “Microscopic calibration and validation of car-following models–a systematic approach,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 80, pp. 922–939, 2013.
- M. Zhu, X. Wang, A. Tarko et al., “Modeling car-following behavior on urban expressways in shanghai: A naturalistic driving study,” Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, vol. 93, pp. 425–445, 2018.
- P. G. Gipps, “A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation,” Transportation research part B: methodological, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 105–111, 1981.
- G. F. Newell, “A simplified car-following theory: a lower order model,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 195–205, 2002.
- M. Treiber, A. Hennecke, and D. Helbing, “Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations,” Physical review E, vol. 62, no. 2, p. 1805, 2000.
- M. Zhu, X. Wang, and Y. Wang, “Human-like autonomous car-following model with deep reinforcement learning,” Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, vol. 97, pp. 348–368, 2018.
- X. Wang, R. Jiang, L. Li, Y. Lin, X. Zheng, and F.-Y. Wang, “Capturing car-following behaviors by deep learning,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 910–920, 2017.
- P. Angkititrakul, T. Ryuta, T. Wakita, K. Takeda, C. Miyajima, and T. Suzuki, “Evaluation of driver-behavior models in real-world car-following task,” in 2009 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES). IEEE, 2009, pp. 113–118.
- S. Lefèvre, C. Sun, R. Bajcsy, and C. Laugier, “Comparison of parametric and non-parametric approaches for vehicle speed prediction,” in 2014 American Control Conference. IEEE, 2014, pp. 3494–3499.
- P. Angkititrakul, C. Miyajima, and K. Takeda, “Stochastic mixture modeling of driving behavior during car following,” Journal of information and communication convergence engineering, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 95–102, 2013.
- X. Chen, C. Zhang, Z. Cheng, Y. Hou, and L. Sun, “A bayesian gaussian mixture model for probabilistic modeling of car-following behaviors,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2023.
- C. Viroli, “Finite mixtures of matrix normal distributions for classifying three-way data,” Statistics and Computing, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 511–522, 2011.
- F. Yin, G. Hu, and W. Shen, “Analysis of professional basketball field goal attempts via a bayesian matrix clustering approach,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 49–60, 2023.
- W. Wang, J. Xi, and D. Zhao, “Learning and inferring a driver’s braking action in car-following scenarios,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 3887–3899, 2018.
- D. Lewandowski, D. Kurowicka, and H. Joe, “Generating random correlation matrices based on vines and extended onion method,” Journal of multivariate analysis, vol. 100, no. 9, pp. 1989–2001, 2009.
- W. Wang, L. Wang, C. Zhang, C. Liu, L. Sun et al., “Social interactions for autonomous driving: A review and perspectives,” Foundations and Trends® in Robotics, vol. 10, no. 3-4, pp. 198–376, 2022.
- V. Punzo, M. T. Borzacchiello, and B. Ciuffo, “On the assessment of vehicle trajectory data accuracy and application to the next generation simulation (ngsim) program data,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1243–1262, 2011.
- C. Zhang, J. Zhu, W. Wang, and J. Xi, “Spatiotemporal learning of multivehicle interaction patterns in lane-change scenarios,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2021.
- E. Bingham, J. P. Chen, M. Jankowiak, F. Obermeyer, N. Pradhan, T. Karaletsos, R. Singh, P. Szerlip, P. Horsfall, and N. D. Goodman, “Pyro: Deep Universal Probabilistic Programming,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2018.
- C. J. Willmott, S. G. Ackleson, R. E. Davis, J. J. Feddema, K. M. Klink, D. R. Legates, J. O’donnell, and C. M. Rowe, “Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, vol. 90, no. C5, pp. 8995–9005, 1985.
- C. Zhang and L. Sun, “Bayesian calibration of the intelligent driver model,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2024.