Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 91 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s
GPT-5 High 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 87 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 464 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 171 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Data Collection of Real-Life Knowledge Work in Context: The RLKWiC Dataset (2404.10505v1)

Published 16 Apr 2024 in cs.AI

Abstract: Over the years, various approaches have been employed to enhance the productivity of knowledge workers, from addressing psychological well-being to the development of personal knowledge assistants. A significant challenge in this research area has been the absence of a comprehensive, publicly accessible dataset that mirrors real-world knowledge work. Although a handful of datasets exist, many are restricted in access or lack vital information dimensions, complicating meaningful comparison and benchmarking in the domain. This paper presents RLKWiC, a novel dataset of Real-Life Knowledge Work in Context, derived from monitoring the computer interactions of eight participants over a span of two months. As the first publicly available dataset offering a wealth of essential information dimensions (such as explicated contexts, textual contents, and semantics), RLKWiC seeks to address the research gap in the personal information management domain, providing valuable insights for modeling user behavior.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (28)
  1. P. F. Drucker, “Knowledge-worker productivity: The biggest challenge,” California management review, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 79–94, 1999.
  2. W. Reinhardt, B. Schmidt, P. Sloep, and H. Drachsler, “Knowledge worker roles and actions—results of two empirical studies,” Knowledge and process management, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 150–174, 2011.
  3. M. Soto, C. Satterfield, T. Fritz, G. C. Murphy, D. C. Shepherd, and N. Kraft, “Observing and predicting knowledge worker stress, focus and awakeness in the wild,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 146, p. 102560, 2021.
  4. S. J. Koldijk, “Context-aware support for stress self-management: from theory to practice,” Ph.D. dissertation, [Sl: sn], 2016.
  5. H. Holz, H. Maus, A. Bernardi, and O. Rostanin, “From lightweight, proactive information delivery to business process-oriented knowledge management,” J. of Universal Knowledge Management, vol. 2, no. 2005, pp. 101–127, 2005.
  6. T. Vuong, G. Jacucci, and T. Ruotsalo, “Watching inside the screen: Digital activity monitoring for task recognition and proactive information retrieval,” Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–23, 2017.
  7. M. Sappelli, S. Verberne, and W. Kraaij, “Evaluation of context-aware recommendation systems for information re-finding,” J. of the Association for Information Science and Tech, vol. 68, no. 4, 2017.
  8. T. Vuong, “Behavioral task modeling for entity recommendation,” Series of publications A/Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki., 2022.
  9. G. Jacucci, P. Daee, T. Vuong, S. Andolina, K. Klouche, M. Sjöberg, T. Ruotsalo, and S. Kaski, “Entity recommendation for everyday digital tasks,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1–41, 2021.
  10. M. Bakhshizadeh, C. Jilek, H. Maus, and A. Dengel, “Leveraging context-aware recommender systems for improving personal knowledge assistants by introducing contextual states.” in LWDA, 2021, pp. 1–12.
  11. S. Chernov, E. Minack, and P. Serdyukov, “Converting desktop into a personal activity dataset,” in Proceedings of 9th Russian national research conference on digital libraries, 2007, pp. 280–283.
  12. V. Dhar, “Data science and prediction,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 64–73, 2013.
  13. V. M. González and G. Mark, “”constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness” managing multiple working spheres,” in SIGCHI Conf. on Human factors in computing systems, Proc., 2004.
  14. S. Koldijk, M. Sappelli, S. Verberne, M. A. Neerincx, and W. Kraaij, “The swell knowledge work dataset for stress and user modeling research,” in Proceedings of the 16th international conference on multimodal interaction, 2014, pp. 291–298.
  15. M. Sappelli, S. Verberne, S. Koldijk, and W. Kraaij, “Collecting a dataset of information behaviour in context,” in 4th Workshop on Context-Awareness in Retrieval and REC, Proc., 2014.
  16. H. T. Mirza, L. Chen, I. Hussain, A. Majid, and G. Chen, “A study on automatic classification of users’ desktop interactions,” Cybernetics and Systems, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 320–341, 2015.
  17. C. Satterfield, T. Fritz, and G. C. Murphy, “Identifying and describing information seeking tasks,” in Proceedings of the 35th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2020, pp. 797–808.
  18. P. M. S. Sánchez, J. M. J. Valero, M. Zago, A. H. Celdrán, L. F. Maimó, E. L. Bernal, S. L. Bernal, J. M. Valverde, P. Nespoli, J. P. Galindo et al., “Behacom-a dataset modelling users’ behaviour in computers,” Data in Brief, vol. 31, p. 105767, 2020.
  19. F. Pellegrin, Z. Yücel, A. Monden, and P. Leelaprute, “Task estimation for software company employees based on computer interaction logs,” Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 26, pp. 1–48, 2021.
  20. A. N. Meyer, C. Satterfield, M. Züger, K. Kevic, G. C. Murphy, T. Zimmermann, and T. Fritz, “Detecting developers’ task switches and types,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 225–240, 2020.
  21. L. Sauermann, L. Van Elst, and A. Dengel, “Pimo-a framework for representing personal information models,” Proceedings of I-Semantics, vol. 7, pp. 270–277, 2007.
  22. C. Jilek, M. Schröder, H. Maus, S. Schwarz, and A. Dengel, “Towards self-organizing personal knowledge assistants in evolving corporate memories,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.01732, 2023.
  23. C. Jilek, M. Schröder, S. Schwarz, H. Maus, and A. Dengel, “Context spaces as the cornerstone of a near-transparent and self-reorganizing semantic desktop,” in The Semantic Web: ESWC 2018 Satellite Events: ESWC 2018 Satellite Events, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, June 3-7, 2018, Revised Selected Papers 15.   Springer, 2018, pp. 89–94.
  24. M. Schröder, “User activity tracking,” dfki.de, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.dfki.uni-kl.de/kwt/user-activity-tracking/
  25. L. Sauermann, A. Bernardi, and A. Dengel, “Overview and outlook on the semantic desktop,” in Semantic Desktop Workshop; ISWC 2005, Proc., vol. 175.   CEUR-WS.org, 2005.
  26. L. Sauermann and M. Jazayeri, “The gnowsis semantic desktop approach to personal information management,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Computer Science at University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), 2009.
  27. C. Jilek, M. Schröder, S. Schwarz, H. Maus, and A. Dengel, “Context spaces as the cornerstone of a near-transparent and self-reorganizing semantic desktop,” dfki.de, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.dfki.uni-kl.de/~jilek/demo/cspaces/
  28. S. Koldijk, M. Van Staalduinen, M. Neerincx, and W. Kraaij, “Real-time task recognition based on knowledge workers’ computer activities,” in Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, 2012, pp. 152–159.
Citations (3)
View on Semantic Scholar
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

List Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Explore 10 Community Prompts
Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now