Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
AI Research Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 81 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 42 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 188 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 454 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Geometry of Kirkwood-Dirac classical states: A case study based on discrete Fourier transform (2404.09399v2)

Published 15 Apr 2024 in quant-ph

Abstract: The characterization of Kirkwood-Dirac (KD) classicality or non-classicality is very important in quantum information processing. In general, the set of KD classical states with respect to two bases is not a convex polytope[J. Math. Phys. \textbf{65} 072201 (2024)], which makes us interested in finding out in which circumnstances they do form a polytope. In this paper, we focus on the characterization of KD classicality of mixed states for the case where the transition matrix between two bases is a discrete Fourier transform (DFT) matrix in Hilbert space with dimensions $p2$ and $pq$, respectively, where $p, q$ are prime. For the two particular cases we investigate, the sets of extremal points are finite, implying that the set of KD classical states we characterize forms a convex polytope. We show that for $p2$ dimensional system, the set $\rm{KD}{\mathcal{A},\mathcal{B}}+$ is a convex hull of the set $\rm {pure}({\rm {KD}{\mathcal{A},\mathcal{B}}+})$ based on DFT, where $\rm{KD}{\mathcal{A},\mathcal{B}}+$ is the set of KD classical states with respect to two bases and $\rm {pure}({\rm {KD}{\mathcal{A},\mathcal{B}}+})$ is the set of all the rank-one projectors of KD classical pure states with respect to two bases. In $pq$ dimensional system, we believe that this result also holds. Unfortunately, we do not completely prove it, but some meaningful conclusions are obtained about the characterization of KD classicality.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. Ollivier H and Zurek W H 2001 Quantum discord: a measure of the quantumness of correlations Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 017901
  2. Baumgratz T, Cramer M and Plenio M B 2014 Quantifying coherence Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 140401
  3. Robertson H P 1929 The uncertainty principle Phys. Rev. 34 163
  4. Kirkwood J G 1933 Quantum statistics of almost classical assemblies Phys. Rev. 44 31
  5. Dirac P A 1945 On the analogy between classical and quantum mechanics Rev. Mod. Phys. 17 195
  6. Brookes B C and Kolmogorov A N 1951 Foundations of the theory of probability The Math. Gaz. 35 292
  7. Arvidsson-Shukur D R, Drori J C and Halpern N Y 2021 Conditions tighter than noncommutation needed for nonclassicality J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 54 284001
  8. Xu J W 2022 Kirkwood-Dirac classical pure states (arXiv:2210.02876)
  9. Langrenez C, Arvidsson-Shukur D R and De Bièvre S 2023 Characterizing the geometry of the Kirkwood-Dirac positive states (arXiv:2306.00086)
  10. Lundeen J S and Bamber C 2012 Procedure for direct measurement of general quantum states using weak measurement Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 070402
  11. Bamber C and Lundeen J S 2014 Observing Diracs classical phase space analog to the quantum state Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 070405
  12. Pusey M F 2014 Anomalous weak values are proofs of contextuality Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 200401
  13. Dressel J 2015 Weak values as interference phenomena Phys. Rev. A 91 032116
  14. Jenne J H and Arvidsson-Shukur D R 2022 Unbounded and lossless compression of multiparameter quantum information Phys. Rev. A 106 042404
  15. Halpern N Y, Swingle B and Dressel J 2018 Quasiprobability behind the out-of-time-ordered correlator Phys. Rev. A 97 042105
  16. Levy A and Lostaglio M 2020 Quasiprobability distribution for heat uctuations in the quantum regime PRX Quantum 1 010309
  17. Lostaglio M 2020 Certifying quantum signatures in thermodynamics and metrology via contextuality of quantum linear response Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 230603
  18. Spekkens R W 2008 Negativity and contextuality are equivalent notions of nonclassicality Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 020401
  19. Xu J W 2022 Classi cation of incompatibility for two orthonormal bases Phys. Rev. A 106 022217
  20. Fiorentino V and Weigert S 2022 Uncertainty relations for the support of quantum states J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 55 495305
  21. Hiriart-Urruty J B and Lemaréchal C 2004 Fundamentals of convex analysis Spr. Sci. Bus. Med.
  22. He J Y and Fu S S 2024 Nonclassicality of the Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability distribution via quantum modification terms Phys. Rev. A 109 012215
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 2 posts and received 0 likes.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube