Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
120 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

State-space systems as dynamic generative models (2404.08717v3)

Published 12 Apr 2024 in stat.ML, cs.LG, math.DS, math.PR, math.ST, and stat.TH

Abstract: A probabilistic framework to study the dependence structure induced by deterministic discrete-time state-space systems between input and output processes is introduced. General sufficient conditions are formulated under which output processes exist and are unique once an input process has been fixed, a property that in the deterministic state-space literature is known as the echo state property. When those conditions are satisfied, the given state-space system becomes a generative model for probabilistic dependences between two sequence spaces. Moreover, those conditions guarantee that the output depends continuously on the input when using the Wasserstein metric. The output processes whose existence is proved are shown to be causal in a specific sense and to generalize those studied in purely deterministic situations. The results in this paper constitute a significant stochastic generalization of sufficient conditions for the deterministic echo state property to hold, in the sense that the stochastic echo state property can be satisfied under contractivity conditions that are strictly weaker than those in deterministic situations. This means that state-space systems can induce a purely probabilistic dependence structure between input and output sequence spaces even when there is no functional relation between those two spaces.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. Model selection for weakly dependent time series forecasting. Bernoulli 18, 3 (2012), 883 – 913.
  2. A hybrid approach to atmospheric modeling that combines machine learning with a physics-based numerical model. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 14, 3 (2022), e2021MS002712.
  3. Bollerslev, T. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 31, 3 (1986), 307–327.
  4. Fading memory and the problem of approximating nonlinear operators with Volterra series. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems 32, 11 (1985), 1150–1161.
  5. Time Series: Theory and Methods. Springer-Verlag, 2006.
  6. Weak Dependence: With Examples and Applications. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.
  7. Engle, R. F. Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica 50, 4 (1982), 987–1007.
  8. GARCH models, 2 ed. John Wiley & Sons, 2019.
  9. Risk bounds for reservoir computing. Journal of Machine Learning Research 21, 240 (2020), 1–61.
  10. Approximation error estimates for random neural networks and reservoir systems. The Annals of Applied Probability 33, 1 (2023), 28–69.
  11. Reservoir Computing Universality With Stochastic Inputs. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 31, 1 (2020), 100–112.
  12. Fading memory echo state networks are universal. Neural Networks 138 (2021), 10–13.
  13. Chaos on compact manifolds: Differentiable synchronizations beyond the Takens theorem. Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics 103 (2021), 062204.
  14. Learning strange attractors with reservoir systems. Nonlinearity 36 (2023), 4674–4708.
  15. Echo state networks are universal. Neural Networks 108 (2018), 495–508.
  16. Universal discrete-time reservoir computers with stochastic inputs and linear readouts using non-homogeneous state-affine systems. Journal of Machine Learning Research 19, 24 (2018), 1–40.
  17. Differentiable reservoir computing. Journal of Machine Learning Research 20, 179 (2019), 1–62.
  18. Set Functions. The University of New Mexico Press (1948), ix+324.
  19. Jaeger, H. The “echo state” approach to analysing and training recurrent neural networks – with an Erratum note. Tech. Rep. GMD Report 148, German National Research Center for Information Technology, 2010.
  20. Harnessing nonlinearity: Predicting chaotic systems and saving energy in wireless communication. Science 304, 5667 (2004), 78–80.
  21. A brief survey on the approximation theory for sequence modelling. Journal of Machine Learning 2, 1 (2023), 1–30.
  22. Kalman, R. E. A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Basic Engineering 82, 1 (1960), 35–45.
  23. Chaos, Fractals, and Noise: Stochastic Aspects of Dynamics, vol. 97. Springer Science & Business Media, 1994.
  24. Attractor reconstruction by machine learning. Chaos 28, 6 (2018).
  25. Manjunath, G. Stability and memory-loss go hand-in-hand: three results in dynamics and computation. Proceedings of the Royal Socienty A 476 (2020), 20200563.
  26. Manjunath, G. Embedding information onto a dynamical system. Nonlinearity 35, 3 (jan 2022), 1131.
  27. Transport in reservoir computing. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 449 (2023), 133744.
  28. Model-free prediction of large spatiotemporally chaotic systems from data: A reservoir computing approach. Physical Review Letters 120, 2 (2018), 24102.
  29. Using machine learning to replicate chaotic attractors and calculate Lyapunov exponents from data. Chaos 27, 12 (2017).
  30. Pfanzagl, P. Conditional Distributions as Derivatives. The Annals of Probability 7, 6 (1979), 1046 – 1050.
  31. Sontag, E. Mathematical Control Theory: Deterministic Finite Dimensional Systems. Springer-Verlag, 1998.
  32. Using data assimilation to train a hybrid forecast system that combines machine-learning and knowledge-based components. Chaos 31, 5 (2021), 53114.
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper establishes a probabilistic framework that extends deterministic state-space models into generative ones with unique, continuous stochastic outputs.
  • It generalizes the echo state property by relaxing contractivity requirements, allowing broader applications in dynamic systems.
  • The work employs rigorous mathematical tools, including the Wasserstein metric, to formalize conditions for stochastic input-output dependencies.

Analysis of "State-Space Systems as Dynamic Generative Models"

The paper "State-Space Systems as Dynamic Generative Models" authored by Juan-Pablo Ortega and Florian Rossmannek presents a comprehensive theoretical framework that extends the deterministic state-space systems into a probabilistic domain. The key contribution of the work is in formulating conditions under which deterministic state-space frameworks provide unique and continuous stochastic outputs when stochastic inputs are specified, reminiscent of the echo state property in the deterministic framework.

Summary of Contributions

The authors introduce a probabilistic formulation that enables state-space models to operate as dynamic generative models, linking sequence spaces for input and output. Notably, the authors provide sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of these output processes, which are foundational for the deployment of state-space systems as generative models. This contribution represents a significant stochastic generalization of established conditions for the echo state property seen in deterministic models. Importantly, the paper addresses scenarios where the traditional deterministic functional relationship between inputs and outputs is not applicable, thus extending the utility of state-space systems in the domain of probabilistic modeling.

Detailed Insights

  1. Echo State Property Generalization: The paper builds upon the echo state property (ESP) from deterministic setups, extending it to stochastic scenarios. By relaxing contractivity conditions required in deterministic frameworks, the authors achieve broader applicability—showing that even without deterministic solution uniqueness, stochastic solutions can still hold.
  2. Stochastic Dependent Structures: Through the adoption of a probabilistic lens, the paper rigorously defines how state-space systems can induce a dependency structure between stochastic input and output processes. This formulation aligns with the properties of functional analytic approaches, utilizing tools such as the Wasserstein metric to ensure robustness in modeling continuity and causality.
  3. Formalization and Theoretical Rigor: The paper systematically extends the deterministic state-space framework to incorporate stochastic input-output dependencies, providing a mathematical formulation and proof structure to underpin these extensions. This includes the development of sufficient conditions for what the authors call the "stochastic echo state property," allowing for continuous outcomes based on the Wasserstein distance, thus ensuring the continuity of the output process relative to the input process.
  4. Contractivity and Boundedness Conditions: The paper meticulously derives conditions under which stochastic input measures maintain contractivity and boundedness, determining scenarios under which unique stochastic outputs are generated. Through illustrative examples like GARCH processes, time-varying VAR models, and echo state networks, the authors explore the practical implementation of these conditions.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of this paper are profound for both the theoretical and applied domains of AI. By establishing state-space systems as viable generative models under stochastic conditions, the work promises enhanced modeling techniques for complex dynamic systems in various fields, including economics, electrical engineering, and machine learning.

Practically, the work opens avenues for leveraging state-space systems in scenarios dealing with incomplete information or partial observability—conditions often encountered in real-world applications. The theoretical framework developed provides a solid foundation for future works aimed at exploiting stochastic properties in AI, particularly in the design and optimization of algorithms that require robust handling of time-series data.

One intriguing future direction lies in exploring the universality of state-space systems as generative models within broader classes of stochastic processes. Additionally, investigating the interaction of these systems with alternative learning paradigms, such as deep learning or reinforcement learning, could yield new insights into dynamic system behavior under uncertainty, optimizing the design and control of autonomous systems operating in stochastic environments.

In conclusion, this paper by Ortega and Rossmannek contributes significantly to the stochastic modeling domain, establishing a rigorous theoretical basis for using state-space systems as dynamic generative models under stochastic conditions. The framework propounded holds the potential for impactful application and extensions in various fields where stochastic dynamics play a crucial role.