Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 83 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 83 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 109 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 460 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The Rise and Fall of the Initial Era (2404.06500v2)

Published 9 Apr 2024 in cs.DL

Abstract: Bibliographic data is a rich source of information that goes beyond the use cases of location and citation -- it also encodes both cultural and technological context. For most of its existence, the scholarly record has changed slowly and hence provides an opportunity to gain insight through its reflection of the cultural norms of the research community over the last four centuries. While it is often difficult to distinguish the originating driver of change, it is still valuable to consider the motivating influences that have led to changes in the structure of the scholarly record. An "initial era" is identified during which initials were used in preference to full names by authors on scholarly communications. Causes of the emergence and demise of this era are considered as well as the implications of this era on research culture and practice.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (33)
  1. P. A. Hall, ed., Varieties Of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, illustrated edition ed. (Oxford University Press, U.S.A., Oxford England ; New York, 2001).
  2. J. Jarvis, The Gutenberg Parenthesis: The Age of Print and Its Lessons for the Age of the Internet (Bloomsbury Academic, New York, 2023).
  3. M. Taylor, “How do publications find their audience?”  (2024), publisher: figshare.
  4. D. W. Hook and S. J. Porter, Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 6 (2021).
  5. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 4, 1075 (1997), publisher: Royal Society.
  6. L. A. Whited, ed., The Ivory Tower and Harry Potter: Perspectives on a Literary Phenomenon (University of Missouri Press, Columbia, Mo., 2004).
  7. S. Nakamoto, “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System,”  (2008).
  8. A. Katsnelson, Nature  (2014), 10.1038/nature.2014.15106, publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  9. S. Reardon, Nature  (2017), 10.1038/nature.2017.23022, publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  10. J. Adams, Nature 497, 557 (2013), number: 7451 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  11. The first paper in Dimensions with co-authorship of more than 100 authors is in Chemistry from 1928 Emich et al. (1928).
  12. V. Bush, The Endless Frontier, Report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research, Tech. Rep. (OFFICE OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON DC, 1945).
  13. J. R. Oppenheimer, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 50, 1194 (1963), publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
  14. W. R. Lefanu, Bulletin of the Institute of the History of Medicine 5, 735 (1937), publisher: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  15. W. A. Kretzschmar, in Language in the USA: Themes for the Twenty-first Century, edited by E. Finegan and J. R. Rickford (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004) pp. 39–57.
  16. G. Hofstede, Journal of International Business Studies 14, 75 (1983).
  17. G. Hofstede, Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2 (2011), 10.9707/2307-0919.1014.
  18. C. P. Snow, The Two Cultures, reissue edition ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012).
  19. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275, 12361 (2000).
  20. A. B. Watson, Journal of Vision 11, ii (2011).
  21. J. Smith and R. Smith, BMJ 312, 1626 (1996).
  22. NLM, “MEDLINE Data Changes - 2002. NLM Technical Bulletin. Nov-Dec 2001,”  (2002).
  23. NLM, “Skill Kit: Searching Full Author Names in PubMed®,”  (2009), publisher: U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  24. Crossref, The Formation of CrossRef: A Short History, Tech. Rep. (CrossRef, 2009).
  25. Clarivate, “Web of Science Core Collection: Explanation on Full Author Names,”  (2022).
  26. P. J. Hane, “Elsevier Announces Scopus Service,”  (2004).
  27. E. Sullo, Journal of the Medical Library Association 95, 367 (2007).
  28. B. Jörg, Data Science Journal 9 (2010), 10.2481/dsj.CRIS4.
  29. D. Butler, Nature 485, 564 (2012), number: 7400 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  30. Q. Schiermeier, Nature 526, 281 (2015), number: 7572 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  31. U. I. for Statistics, “Share of women among total researchers by country, 1996–2018,” .
  32. S. J. Porter, Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 7, 779097 (2022).
  33. S. J. Porter and L. D. McIntosh, “Identifying Fabricated Networks within Authorship-for-Sale Enterprises,”  (2024), arXiv:2401.04022 [cs].

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 3 posts and received 3 likes.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube