Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 47 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 37 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 11 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 195 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 30 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Pulsar Timing Array Harmonic Analysis and Source Angular Correlations (2404.05677v3)

Published 8 Apr 2024 in gr-qc and astro-ph.CO

Abstract: Gravitational waves (GWs) influence the arrival times of radio signals coming from pulsars. Here, we investigate the harmonic space approach to describing a pulsar's response to GWs. We derive and discuss the "diagonalized form" of the response, which is a sum of spin-2-weighted spherical harmonics of the GW direction multiplied by normal (spin-weight 0) spherical harmonics of the pulsar direction. We show how this allows many useful objects, for example, the Hellings and Downs two-point function, to be easily calculated. The approach also provides a clear description of the gauge dependence. We then employ this harmonic approach to model the effects of angular correlations in the sky locations of GW sources (sometimes called "statistical isotropy"). To do this, we construct rotationally invariant ensembles made up of many Gaussian subensembles, each of which breaks rotational invariance. Using harmonic techniques, we compute the cosmic covariance and the total covariance of the Hellings and Downs correlation in these models. The results may be used to assess the impact of angular source correlations on the Hellings and Downs correlation, and for optimal reconstruction of the Hellings and Downs curve in models where GW sources have correlated sky locations.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (44)
  1. J. Antoniadis et al. (EPTA and InPTA Collaborations), The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array: III. Search for gravitational wave signals, Astronomy &\&& Astrophysics 678, A50 (2023).
  2. G. Agazie et al. (NANOGrav Collaboration), The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 951, L8 (2023).
  3. D. J. Reardon et al. (PPTA Collaboration), Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 951, L6 (2023).
  4. H. Xu et al. (CPTA Collaboration), Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics 23, 075024 (2023).
  5. J. D. Romano and B. Allen, Answers to frequently asked questions about the pulsar timing array Hellings and Downs curve (2024), arXiv:2308.05847 [gr-qc] .
  6. R. K. Sachs and A. M. Wolfe, Perturbations of a Cosmological Model and Angular Variations of the Microwave Background, ApJ 147, 73 (1967).
  7. E. Roebber and G. Holder, Harmonic space analysis of pulsar timing array redshift maps, Astrophys. J. 835, 21 (2017).
  8. R. C. Bernardo and K.-W. Ng, Pulsar and cosmic variances of pulsar timing-array correlation measurements of the stochastic gravitational wave background, J. C. A. P. 2022, 046 (2022), arXiv:2209.14834 [gr-qc] .
  9. G.-C. Liu and K.-W. Ng, Timing-residual power spectrum of a polarized stochastic gravitational-wave background in pulsar-timing-array observation, Phys. Rev. D 106, 064004 (2022).
  10. W. Qin, K. K. Boddy, and M. Kamionkowski, Subluminal stochastic gravitational waves in pulsar-timing arrays and astrometry, Phys. Rev. D 103, 024045 (2021).
  11. S. C. Hotinli, M. Kamionkowski, and A. H. Jaffe, The search for statistical anisotropy in the gravitational-wave background with pulsar timing arrays, The Open Journal of Astrophysics 2, 10.21105/astro.1904.05348 (2019).
  12. E. Belgacem and M. Kamionkowski, Chirality of the gravitational-wave background and pulsar-timing arrays, Phys. Rev. D 102, 023004 (2020).
  13. G. Sato-Polito and M. Kamionkowski, Exploring the spectrum of stochastic gravitational-wave anisotropies with pulsar timing arrays (2023), arXiv:2305.05690 [astro-ph.CO] .
  14. N. A. Kumar and M. Kamionkowski, All the pretty overlap reduction functions (2023), arXiv:2311.14159 [astro-ph.CO] .
  15. G. Sato-Polito and M. Kamionkowski, Pulsar-timing measurement of the circular polarization of the stochastic gravitational-wave background, Phys. Rev. D 106, 023004 (2022).
  16. R. C. Bernardo and K.-W. Ng, Beyond the Hellings-Downs curve: Non-Einsteinian gravitational waves in pulsar timing array correlations (2023a), arXiv:2310.07537 [gr-qc] .
  17. R. C. Bernardo and K.-W. Ng, Constraining gravitational wave propagation using pulsar timing array correlations, Phys. Rev. D 107, L101502 (2023b).
  18. R. C. Bernardo and K.-W. Ng, Hunting the stochastic gravitational wave background in pulsar timing array cross correlations through theoretical uncertainty, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2023 (08), 028.
  19. R. C. Bernardo and K.-W. Ng, Stochastic gravitational wave background phenomenology in a pulsar timing array, Phys. Rev. D 107, 044007 (2023d).
  20. R. C. Bernardo, G.-C. Liu, and K.-W. Ng, Correlations for an anisotropic polarized stochastic gravitational wave background in pulsar timing arrays (2024), arXiv:2312.03383 [gr-qc] .
  21. R. C. Bernardo and K.-W. Ng, Testing gravity with cosmic variance-limited pulsar timing array correlations (2023e), arXiv:2306.13593 [gr-qc] .
  22. R. W. Hellings and G. S. Downs, Upper limits on the isotropic gravitational radiation background from pulsar timing analysis, Astrophys. J. 265, L39 (1983).
  23. B. Allen, Variance of the Hellings-Downs correlation, Phys. Rev. D 107, 043018 (2023), arXiv:2205.05637 [gr-qc] .
  24. N. J. Cornish and A. Sesana, Pulsar timing array analysis for black hole backgrounds, Classical and Quantum Gravity 30, 224005 (2013).
  25. G. Last and M. Penrose, Lectures on the Poisson Process, Institute of Mathematical Statistics Textbooks (Cambridge University Press, 2017).
  26. A. C. Jenkins and M. Sakellariadou, Anisotropies in the stochastic gravitational-wave background: Formalism and the cosmic string case, Phys. Rev. D 98, 063509 (2018).
  27. A. C. Jenkins, J. D. Romano, and M. Sakellariadou, Estimating the angular power spectrum of the gravitational-wave background in the presence of shot noise, Phys. Rev. D 100, 083501 (2019).
  28. The two-step averaging process employed in the literature is nicely described by [33, Fig. 2], which conveys the essence of the “ensemble of Gaussian subensembles” approach.
  29. Pretty illustrations of random point processes on a sphere are found in Fig. 1 of [54] and Fig. 1 of [55]. These compare a Poisson process to random processes where repulsive forces tend to anticorrelate the locations.
  30. B. Allen and J. D. Romano, Hellings and Downs correlation of an arbitrary set of pulsars, Phys. Rev. D 108, 043026 (2023).
  31. J. D. Romano and N. J. Cornish, Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment, Living Rev. Relativ. 20, 2 (2017).
  32. G. F. Torres del Castillo, 3-D Spinors, Spin-Weighted Functions and their Applications, Progress in Mathematical Physics v.32 (Birkhäuser Boston, 2012).
  33. B. Allen and S. Valtolina, Pulsar timing array source ensembles, arXiv e-prints 10.48550/arXiv.2401.14329 (2024), to appear in PRD.
  34. L. Isserlis, On a formula for the product-moment coefficient of any order of a normal frequency distribution in any number of variables, Biometrika 12, 134 (1918), note that Isserlis’ theorem is often called “Wick’s theorem” in the physics community, although the Wick’s work was three decades later.
  35. B. Allen and A. C. Ottewill, Detection of anisotropies in the gravitational-wave stochastic background, Phys. Rev. D 56, 545 (1997).
  36. Strictly speaking, to enforce “no preferred directions”, we would also have to require that higher moments do not single out any directions.
  37. S. Alisauskas, Coupling coefficients of SO(n) and integrals involving Jacobi and Gegenbauer polynomials, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 35, 7323 (2002).
  38. Nastassia Grimm-Thieme, work in progress, 2024.
  39. D. Agarwal and J. D. Romano, Cosmic variance of the Hellings and Downs correlation for statistically isotropic gravitational-wave backgrounds (2024), unpublished draft.
  40. M. Favata, Post-newtonian corrections to the gravitational-wave memory for quasicircular, inspiralling compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D 80, 024002 (2009).
  41. G. Arfken, H. Weber, and F. Harris, Mathematical Methods for Physicists: A Comprehensive Guide, seventh ed. (Elsevier Science, 2013).
  42. M. Benacquista and J. Romano, Classical Mechanics, Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer International Publishing, 2018).
  43. J. Møller and E. Rubak, Functional summary statistics for point processes on the sphere with an application to determinantal point processes (2016), arXiv:1601.03448 [stat.ME] .
  44. S. R. Taylor and J. R. Gair, Searching for anisotropic gravitational-wave backgrounds using pulsar timing arrays, Phys. Rev. D 88, 084001 (2013).
Citations (9)
View on Semantic Scholar
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Authors (1)

  1. Bruce Allen