Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Dynamic Prompt Optimizing for Text-to-Image Generation (2404.04095v1)

Published 5 Apr 2024 in cs.CV and cs.AI

Abstract: Text-to-image generative models, specifically those based on diffusion models like Imagen and Stable Diffusion, have made substantial advancements. Recently, there has been a surge of interest in the delicate refinement of text prompts. Users assign weights or alter the injection time steps of certain words in the text prompts to improve the quality of generated images. However, the success of fine-control prompts depends on the accuracy of the text prompts and the careful selection of weights and time steps, which requires significant manual intervention. To address this, we introduce the \textbf{P}rompt \textbf{A}uto-\textbf{E}diting (PAE) method. Besides refining the original prompts for image generation, we further employ an online reinforcement learning strategy to explore the weights and injection time steps of each word, leading to the dynamic fine-control prompts. The reward function during training encourages the model to consider aesthetic score, semantic consistency, and user preferences. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method effectively improves the original prompts, generating visually more appealing images while maintaining semantic alignment. Code is available at https://github.com/Mowenyii/PAE.

An Overview of "Dynamic Prompt Optimizing for Text-to-Image Generation"

The paper "Dynamic Prompt Optimizing for Text-to-Image Generation" addresses a crucial challenge in the domain of text-to-image generation: optimizing text prompts to achieve improved image quality and semantic alignment without extensive manual input. This work is a methodical investigation into the automatization of prompt refinement, integrating reinforcement learning within text-to-image models, which have seen significant advancements primarily through diffusion techniques, such as those employed by Stable Diffusion and Imagen.

Research Context and Approach

The challenge tackled is the sensitivity of these generative models to the length and structure of input text prompts, which can lead to varied outcomes even for prompts conveying similar meanings. This sensitivity necessitates a nuanced approach for prompt optimization, a task traditionally reliant on manual methods that are labor-intensive and often inefficient.

The paper introduces a novel methodology termed Prompt Auto-Editing (PAE), which builds on this manual practice through automatized refinement processes. The method comprises an integration of reinforcement learning strategies to dynamically adjust the prompt configurations by exploring variables such as word weights and injection time steps — processes that are traditionally managed via heuristic adjustments by users. The optimization goal is to enhance the aesthetic appeal, semantic consistency, and alignment with user preferences in the generated images.

Methodological Framework

The PAE framework is made up of a two-stage training process, focusing on both static and dynamic aspects of prompt engineering:

  1. Prompt Refinement via Supervised Fine-Tuning: This stage utilizes a fine-tuned LLM, based initially on GPT-2, to enrich user input prompts by appending effective modifiers. A confidence score filters publicly available datasets, ensuring only the highest quality prompt-image pairs are selected for training.
  2. Dynamic Fine-Control via Reinforcement Learning: The second phase employs a dynamic approach by utilizing Reinforcement Learning (RL) to extend the model’s capabilities to dynamically assign importance to specific prompt words and adjust effect time-ranges in the diffusion process. This is supported by a reward function taking into account the aesthetic quality, semantic consistency, and user preferences.

Experimental Evaluation

Experimental evidence in the paper validates the efficiency of the PAE using datasets such as Lexica.art and DiffusionDB. PAE was tested for its ability to outperform existing methods, notably achieving higher aesthetic scores while maintaining strong human preferences, as indicated by PickScore. Furthermore, its application on the COCO dataset demonstrates its robustness and capacity to generalize beyond the trained domains, a key feature for practical adoption.

Implications and Future Work

PAE offers notable implications for both the theoretical understanding and practical applications in AI-driven content generation. Theoretically, it propels our understanding of prompt optimization's impact on generative model outputs, suggesting a shift towards more generalized and adaptable modeling frameworks. Practically, it reduces the reliance on manual prompt engineering, thereby improving user efficiency and broadening the applicability of text-to-image models across diverse industries, from media and entertainment to online content creation.

The findings prompt further exploration into integrating newer LLM architectures and more sophisticated RL frameworks. Future studies could also explore embedding user-specific preference models directly into the generation pipeline, thereby ensuring that outputs not only meet general aesthetic standards but also align with individual user or industry-specific tastes and requirements.

In summary, this work contributes an innovative, automated approach to prompt refinement, crucially enhancing the intersection of language processing and image generation within AI systems, and setting a foundation for future advancements in the field.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (45)
  1. All are worth words: A vit backbone for diffusion models. 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 22669–22679, 2023.
  2. Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv, abs/2005.14165, 2020.
  3. Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 24:240:1–240:113, 2023.
  4. VQGAN-CLIP: open domain image generation and editing with natural language guidance. In Computer Vision - ECCV 2022 - 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23-27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XXXVII, pages 88–105. Springer, 2022.
  5. What is in a text-to-image prompt: The potential of stable diffusion in visual arts education. CoRR, abs/2301.01902, 2023.
  6. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT 2019, Minneapolis, MN, USA, June 2-7, 2019, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 4171–4186. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019.
  7. Taming transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 12868–12878, 2020.
  8. David E. Goldberg. Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, 1989.
  9. Optimizing prompts for text-to-image generation. CoRR, abs/2212.09611, 2022.
  10. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, December 4-9, 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA, pages 6626–6637, 2017.
  11. Cascaded diffusion models for high fidelity image generation. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 23:47:1–47:33, 2022.
  12. Rethinking FID: towards a better evaluation metric for image generation. CoRR, abs/2401.09603, 2024.
  13. Pick-a-pic: An open dataset of user preferences for text-to-image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.01569, 2023.
  14. On information and sufficiency. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22(1):79–86, 1951.
  15. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In Computer Vision – ECCV 2014, pages 740–755, Cham, 2014. Springer International Publishing.
  16. Design guidelines for prompt engineering text-to-image generative models. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2022.
  17. Glide: Towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models. In ICML, 2022.
  18. OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv, abs/2303.08774, 2023.
  19. Jonas Oppenlaender. The creativity of text-to-image generation. In 25th International Academic Mindtrek conference, Academic Mindtrek 2022, Tampere, Finland, November 16-18, 2022, pages 192–202, 2022a.
  20. Jonas Oppenlaender. A taxonomy of prompt modifiers for text-to-image generation. arXiv, abs/2204.13988, 2022b.
  21. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. In NeurIPS, 2022.
  22. Best prompts for text-to-image models and how to find them. arXiv, abs/2209.11711, 2022.
  23. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4195–4205, 2023.
  24. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. OpenAI, 2018.
  25. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. 2019.
  26. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2021, 18-24 July 2021, Virtual Event, pages 8748–8763. PMLR, 2021.
  27. Zero-shot text-to-image generation. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2021, 18-24 July 2021, Virtual Event, pages 8821–8831. PMLR, 2021.
  28. Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with CLIP latents. CoRR, abs/2204.06125, 2022a.
  29. Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with clip latents. arXiv, abs/2204.06125, 2022b.
  30. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 10674–10685, 2022.
  31. Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. In NeurIPS, 2022.
  32. Proximal policy optimization algorithms. CoRR, abs/1707.06347, 2017.
  33. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. arXiv, abs/1503.03585, 2015.
  34. Intriguing property and counterfactual explanation of gan for remote sensing image generation, 2023a.
  35. A unified gan framework regarding manifold alignment for remote sensing images generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.19507, 2023b.
  36. Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 2818–2826, 2015.
  37. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. CoRR, abs/2302.13971, 2023.
  38. Artwhisperer: A dataset for characterizing human-ai interactions in artistic creations. CoRR, abs/2306.08141, 2023.
  39. DiffusionDB: A large-scale prompt gallery dataset for text-to-image generative models. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 893–911, Toronto, Canada, 2023. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  40. A learning algorithm for continually running fully recurrent neural networks. Neural Comput., 1(2):270–280, 1989.
  41. A prompt log analysis of text-to-image generation systems. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023, WWW 2023, Austin, TX, USA, 30 April 2023 - 4 May 2023, pages 3892–3902. ACM, 2023.
  42. Imagereward: Learning and evaluating human preferences for text-to-image generation. arXiv, abs/2304.05977, 2023.
  43. Versatile diffusion: Text, images and variations all in one diffusion model. CoRR, abs/2211.08332, 2022.
  44. Unipc: A unified predictor-corrector framework for fast sampling of diffusion models. arXiv, abs/2302.04867, 2023.
  45. Collaborative generative AI: integrating gpt-k for efficient editing in text-to-image generation. CoRR, abs/2305.11317, 2023.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Wenyi Mo (4 papers)
  2. Tianyu Zhang (110 papers)
  3. Yalong Bai (23 papers)
  4. Bing Su (46 papers)
  5. Ji-Rong Wen (299 papers)
  6. Qing Yang (138 papers)
Citations (3)
Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com