Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Evaluation and Deployment of LiDAR-based Place Recognition in Dense Forests (2403.14326v2)

Published 21 Mar 2024 in cs.RO

Abstract: Many LiDAR place recognition systems have been developed and tested specifically for urban driving scenarios. Their performance in natural environments such as forests and woodlands have been studied less closely. In this paper, we analyzed the capabilities of four different LiDAR place recognition systems, both handcrafted and learning-based methods, using LiDAR data collected with a handheld device and legged robot within dense forest environments. In particular, we focused on evaluating localization where there is significant translational and orientation difference between corresponding LiDAR scan pairs. This is particularly important for forest survey systems where the sensor or robot does not follow a defined road or path. Extending our analysis we then incorporated the best performing approach, Logg3dNet, into a full 6-DoF pose estimation system -- introducing several verification layers for precise registration. We demonstrated the performance of our methods in three operational modes: online SLAM, offline multi-mission SLAM map merging, and relocalization into a prior map. We evaluated these modes using data captured in forests from three different countries, achieving 80% of correct loop closures candidates with baseline distances up to 5m, and 60% up to 10m. Video at: https://youtu.be/86l-oxjwmjY

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. NetVLAD: CNN Architecture for Weakly Supervised Place Recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 40(6):1437–1451, 2018.
  2. SemanticKITTI: A Dataset for Semantic Scene Understanding of LiDAR Sequences. In IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., 2019.
  3. A method for registration of 3-d shapes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 14(2):239–256, 1992.
  4. SegMap: Segment-based mapping and localization using data-driven descriptors. Int. J. Rob. Res., 2019.
  5. SegMatch: Segment Based Place Recognition in 3D Point Clouds. In IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2017.
  6. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun. ACM, 24(6):381–395, 1981.
  7. Scan Context++: Structural Place Recognition Robust to Rotation and Lateral Variations in Urban Environments. IEEE Trans. Robot., 2021.
  8. G. Kim and A. Kim. Scan context: Egocentric spatial descriptor for place recognition within 3d point cloud map. In IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst., 2018.
  9. MulRan: Multimodal Range Dataset for Urban Place Recognition. In IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2020.
  10. Wild-Places: A Large-Scale Dataset for Lidar Place Recognition in Unstructured Natural Environments. In IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2023.
  11. J. Komorowski. MinkLoc3D: Point Cloud Based Large-Scale Place Recognition. In IEEE Winter Conf. Appl. Comput. Vis., 2021.
  12. Egonn: Egocentric neural network for point cloud based 6dof relocalization at the city scale. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., 7(2):722–729, 2022.
  13. SSC: Semantic scan context for large-scale place recognition. In IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst., 2021.
  14. 1 year, 1000 km: The oxford robotcar dataset. Int. J. Rob. Res., 36(1):3–15, 2017.
  15. Comparing ICP Variants on Real-World Data Sets. Auton. Robot., 34(3):133–148, 2013.
  16. Towards real-time forest inventory using handheld lidar. Robot. Auton. Syst., 157:104240, 2022.
  17. Fine-Tuning CNN Image Retrieval with No Human Annotation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 41(7):1655–1668, 2019.
  18. Learning to see the wood for the trees: Deep laser localization in urban and natural environments on a CPU. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., 4(2):1327–1334, 2019.
  19. Seeing the wood for the trees: Reliable localization in urban and natural environments. In IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst., 2018.
  20. Tartandrive: A large-scale dataset for learning off-road dynamics models. In IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2022.
  21. Locus: Lidar-based place recognition using spatiotemporal higher-order pooling. In IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2021.
  22. Spectral geometric verification: Re-ranking point cloud retrieval for metric localization. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., 8(5):2494–2501, 2023.
  23. LoGG3D-Net: Locally guided global descriptor learning for 3D place recognition. In IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2022.
  24. Intensity scan context: Coding intensity and geometry relations for loop closure detection. In IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2020.
  25. VILENS: Visual, inertial, lidar, and leg odometry for all-terrain legged robots. IEEE Trans. Robot., 39(1):309–326, 2023.
  26. STD: Stable Triangle Descriptor for 3D place recognition. In IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2023.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Haedam Oh (2 papers)
  2. Nived Chebrolu (17 papers)
  3. Matias Mattamala (20 papers)
  4. Leonard Freißmuth (12 papers)
  5. Maurice Fallon (62 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com